Jump to content


Your thoughts about Armored Warfare

aw

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
132 replies to this topic

Heinz234 #121 Posted 02 September 2014 - 08:43 AM

    Sergeant

  • Clan Commander
  • 12176 battles
  • 224
  • [-TWC-] -TWC-
  • Member since:
    12-10-2011

PvP will most likely be a WoT clone indeed.

Gotta love the PVE co-op missions though.

If PvP will have the mission element also I will so love that game!

 

View PostFlapjackbatter, on 31 August 2014 - 11:58 PM, said:

Just as meaningless as calling it beta, and at the same time sell for RL money. Yes, gaijin, I'm looking at you.

 

Guess you weren't here yet when WoT was still in "open beta" and they were selling stuff for real money!

Unfortunately that seems the way to go nowadays.......


Edited by Heinz234, 02 September 2014 - 08:51 AM.


Murphy1up #122 Posted 02 September 2014 - 10:57 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Military Reserve
  • 11249 battles
  • 7,282
  • [-QQ-] -QQ-
  • Member since:
    05-10-2012

View Postmihai_sorin2, on 01 September 2014 - 03:43 PM, said:

 

when topics like this are moved that means something. fear about the competition.

 

 

No, it means this is a forum for World of Tanks and other games are not to be discussed in our main forum section.  I'm not deleting the topic and I specifically left the link in the General Discussion section so anyone following the thread knows where it now is.  I don't care what game you discuss in this section, I'm all for people talking about stuff and sharing their views. I just don't want our General Discussion section which is set up for people specifically to talk about World of Tanks, to be filled with threads about non Wargaming games.

Breitkeil #123 Posted 02 September 2014 - 01:55 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14311 battles
  • 647
  • Member since:
    11-27-2011

View PostSchmeksiman, on 31 August 2014 - 03:21 PM, said:

Disappointing, it's just like WoT only with modern tanks.

It's 90% the same concept, I can't help but to think they are trying to cash in on WoT. HUD looks very much the same, you have Jimbo crosshair there and a few features like reactive armour and AT missiles but the rest is just WoT...

 

I respect WT because they took a different approach and it has some really strong points (however it's much less competitive) but this disappoints me.

 

This being different, for the sake of being different, is one of the reasons why WT Ground Forces failed to become a popular game.

Almost every boy (and girl) on this planet who is interested in tank genre games is already familiar with WoT.  

All those millions of players will immeadiately feel at home in Armored Warfare because it looks so similar.

I gave WT a try when it went open beta. I did not feel at home, got pawned by their fanboys, who knew the game since closed beta, and so I gave it up very soon.

 

Obsidian changed a lot of details though, and I must say I like most of those changes. 

PvE is a huge change, if it works.

My team being blue instead of green is a minor change but it pleases my NATO-heart.  :smile:

 

 

 


Edited by Breitkeil, 02 September 2014 - 01:57 PM.


cricketwes #124 Posted 02 September 2014 - 01:58 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 29093 battles
  • 57
  • [CIRC] CIRC
  • Member since:
    12-08-2012

Like the look of it. Think it's going to be very similar to WoT but you have other types of missions, different upgrades and stuff like that. Can't wait for it!

 

I should be able to take part in the CBT as I signed up to it sometime last year


Edited by cricketwes, 02 September 2014 - 01:58 PM.


SanyaJuutilainen #125 Posted 02 September 2014 - 02:27 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20786 battles
  • 1,876
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011

View PostBortasqu, on 01 September 2014 - 04:03 PM, said:

 

Fixed it.

 

Thanks, re-checked and it's something over 3 years (for EU), yeah. Time sure flies!
 

View PostPalora, on 01 September 2014 - 01:21 PM, said:

From the few minutes that I saw it looks like a WOT clone, but all it has to do is be less retarded then WOT, an easy task,and it might be a better game.

 

WG has been screwing up for years now, shitting on their game and the community constantly, the only thing Obsidian needs to do to win is to not fail, apparently not an easy task as that soviet propaganda "game" (Warthunder ground forces) has demonstrated. 

 

It's an MMO. Every MMO is only as retarded as its players.

CS? If you watch pros it's a great game, tactics, skill. Public CS? Hordes of children calling you names, running all directions and cheating all the time.
The same goes for WoW, WoT, MS, stuff like Runescape, etc., etc. - the more popular the game is, the more retarded the player base, because everybody and their 8 year old nephew plays.

 

So actually a competition, to which part of the player base moves to (because it's the "new cool thing") would only help WoT. Because it would be the most retarded people who would leave first, leaving the interested and skilled people behind.


Edited by Nya_Chan, 02 September 2014 - 02:33 PM.


Shaka_D #126 Posted 02 September 2014 - 07:33 PM

    Colonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 37657 battles
  • 3,761
  • Member since:
    10-18-2010
Honestly??? Looks great doesn't it? Can't wait. Looks like they're taking advantage of WoT's shortcomings. Waiting for the beta with eager anticipation.

mihai_sorin2 #127 Posted 02 September 2014 - 07:38 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 15703 battles
  • 95
  • Member since:
    03-21-2012

View PostEctar, on 02 September 2014 - 11:57 AM, said:

 

No, it means this is a forum for World of Tanks and other games are not to be discussed in our main forum section.  I'm not deleting the topic and I specifically left the link in the General Discussion section so anyone following the thread knows where it now is.  I don't care what game you discuss in this section, I'm all for people talking about stuff and sharing their views. I just don't want our General Discussion section which is set up for people specifically to talk about World of Tanks, to be filled with threads about non Wargaming games.

 

 ok, einstein. you have a tough job indeed, moving threads.

Edited by mihai_sorin2, 02 September 2014 - 08:13 PM.


Woody1999 #128 Posted 02 September 2014 - 08:10 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14144 battles
  • 6,477
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-15-2011

View Postmihai_sorin2, on 02 September 2014 - 07:38 PM, said:

 

ok, ok, einstein.

 

Lol, insulting a Community guy? Get a life. He has a point, leave him be.

 

Woody



mihai_sorin2 #129 Posted 02 September 2014 - 08:16 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 15703 battles
  • 95
  • Member since:
    03-21-2012

View PostWoody1999, on 02 September 2014 - 09:10 PM, said:

 

Lol, insulting a Community guy? Get a life. He has a point, leave him be.

 

Woody

 

are you his lawyer, or his gay lover?

Edited by mihai_sorin2, 02 September 2014 - 08:20 PM.


BodyGuardOfLies #130 Posted 02 September 2014 - 09:04 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 79615 battles
  • 1,132
  • Member since:
    06-07-2011

I enjoy wot and have 45000 battles to prove it so the fact that aw looks similar is not a problem for me.

 

The deciding factor for me will be if they do something about balancing mm by skill.

 

I am so sick of idiot teams that if there were another similar game with better mm I would not hesitate to play it.



SanyaJuutilainen #131 Posted 03 September 2014 - 11:33 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20786 battles
  • 1,876
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011

View PostBodyGuardOfLies, on 02 September 2014 - 10:04 PM, said:

I enjoy wot and have 45000 battles to prove it so the fact that aw looks similar is not a problem for me.

 

The deciding factor for me will be if they do something about balancing mm by skill.

 

I am so sick of idiot teams that if there were another similar game with better mm I would not hesitate to play it.

 

Even (randomly matched by skill) skilled players are idiots. Just play with your clan, it's the only way to make sure somebody listens. Platoons, Teams, CWs, Strongholds... enough options these days.

Outlawz0111 #132 Posted 04 September 2014 - 06:45 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 4351 battles
  • 749
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014
I will be going down the brit line for sure. Game looks great.

Tuench #133 Posted 05 September 2014 - 11:08 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 33114 battles
  • 398
  • [MILAN] MILAN
  • Member since:
    02-18-2012

WTF? already fanboys giving stupid neg -reps? cmon kids, nothing else to do?

 

I hate the red button, here is a guy that asks how i think about it, i say no, i dont like fakes, he gives negreps. where is the point of asking then if u dont accept a non positive anwer?


Edited by Tuench, 05 September 2014 - 11:24 AM.






Also tagged with aw

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users