Search_Warrant, on 10 September 2014 - 10:58 AM, said:
NOOOO that means we need to go through the T49 to get the M41...
I'd leave it at this. The M41 is not OP, it's worthy to be tier 7. It will be competetive against same level scouts atleast.
Search_Warrant, on 10 September 2014 - 10:58 AM, said:
NOOOO that means we need to go through the T49 to get the M41...
I'd leave it at this. The M41 is not OP, it's worthy to be tier 7. It will be competetive against same level scouts atleast.
panzeraustirol, on 10 September 2014 - 01:24 PM, said:
The T49 used the chassis of the Bulldog. Thats why it wasnt Sheridan. + Sheridan only had the derp gun.
And the T-54 Light has an LTTB chassis? And the Ru 251 has an Auf.Panther chassis? It does not matter.
panzeraustirol, on 10 September 2014 - 01:24 PM, said:
On KV-1, everybody uses drainpipe and look how are they doing. Great. Also T49 has red lights, no Bulldog cant handle them.
I used the F-30. I think howitzers are better for mediums, since you can flank and try to actually penetrate something. And we are not making a giant fuzz about lights.
panzeraustirol, on 10 September 2014 - 01:24 PM, said:
I understand that, but everybody will still use Drainpipe (some only look at damage).
That's what I said. I didn't mention the 90 mm yet(?).
panzeraustirol, on 10 September 2014 - 01:24 PM, said:
So? You accelerate at you base or spawn, not where the enemies are (exept if you get detracked).
It gives you the ability to be at useful spots earlier. And acceleration advantages are always a better thing.
panzeraustirol, on 10 September 2014 - 01:24 PM, said:
You are talking about the autoloader instead of the normal gun. So not really great presentation.
Well, if people find this interesting and then think, but I don't want an autoloader, having a single shot gun is only more useful? I'm only saying that one of the guns is already better, and then you have another...
panzeraustirol, on 10 September 2014 - 01:24 PM, said:
So why do you compare these two instead of T49 against RU and T-54 light?
panzeraustirol, on 10 September 2014 - 01:24 PM, said:
So why would I liked Bulldog better? It doesnt have better viewrange then T49...
Not in that specific way, no. But since we already discussed the other advantages, it's also not a sudden reason to make the T49 better.
Note I said: No reason to pick the T49 because it's a better scout. I didn't say: Same viewrange = Bulldog is better.
panzeraustirol, on 10 September 2014 - 01:24 PM, said:
So now even Bulldog isn`t good? Now you are comparing branches, not vehicles.
I'm expressing the fact the T49 is not a great way to continue the line, and you might want to get back to tier 5 to get into the T54E1. I'd suggest to stick to tier 7. Or run 2 lines at a time.
Thanks, Sherlock. That's what I said.
Not to insult you or anything, but I think you should read it well and 2 times before posting.
People who enjoyed VK 28.01 with 10.5 cm derp will LOVE T49.
Man, last night I shot WTF for 1042 dmg knocking out its gun and the loader. You have to love that!
Major_Tankosic, on 26 September 2014 - 04:34 PM, said:
People who enjoyed VK 28.01 with 10.5 cm derp will LOVE T49.
Man, last night I shot WTF for 1042 dmg knocking out its gun and the loader. You have to love that!
sorry vk28 had better accuracy and good dpm, this doesnt have any of them, and few piercing hits on wts doesnt change the fact you are usually sold agaist other lts and mts.
Quick reply to the OP. (I did not read the rest of the thread)
1 reason to keep both: They are both very fun!
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users