Jump to content


M103 and M110


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
156 replies to this topic

ArtyomSTALKER #1 Posted 20 June 2011 - 12:52 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8532 battles
  • 1,337
  • Member since:
    05-04-2011
I just saw 3D models of these 2 tanks and must say its gona be a such refresh from T34 and T30 , not that i dont like T30 - but i only like that gun and to me T29,T34,T30 are preety much the same tank with diferent stats and these replacements (together with T54 and IS7) move this game to "Cold war era"  like evolution of tanks.  B):Smile-izmena:

Valerius #2 Posted 20 June 2011 - 01:15 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 13848 battles
  • 783
  • Member since:
    08-23-2010
and you don't want to share those 3D models with us because.....?

Zieten #3 Posted 20 June 2011 - 01:17 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 12994 battles
  • 2,158
  • Member since:
    08-02-2010

View PostMyonline, on 20 June 2011 - 01:15 AM, said:

and you don't want to share those 3D models with us because.....?

...it will break our hearts when we see how poorly they will perform ingame ;)

ArtyomSTALKER #4 Posted 20 June 2011 - 01:41 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8532 battles
  • 1,337
  • Member since:
    05-04-2011
- here are the images:
  enjoy



- first 3 are M110 and last 2 are M103  :Smile_honoring:

EDIT: pls if u like what u see give me +1 if u want thank u very much  :Smile_honoring:

M1ll4n #5 Posted 20 June 2011 - 01:50 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13377 battles
  • 168
  • Member since:
    05-27-2011
Inb4 machinegun turret on top of M110 is a massive weakspot.

Rutger_NL #6 Posted 20 June 2011 - 01:53 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13393 battles
  • 211
  • Member since:
    03-21-2011

View PostZieten, on 20 June 2011 - 01:17 AM, said:

...it will break our hearts when we see how poorly they will perform ingame ;)
Yeah i fear so too.

Maybe their still brainstorming on how to make the M103 weaker and had to delay it.  :Smile-hiding:

ArtyomSTALKER #7 Posted 20 June 2011 - 02:06 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8532 battles
  • 1,337
  • Member since:
    05-04-2011
- For now i just like the looks of tanks but i heard that M103 indeed was a bad tank in real, even watched a clip on youtube called "Failed Tanks! Chapter 5: The M103 Heavy Tank "

- On 1 point it says it costed a lot of money for taxpayer - LOL i hope repair bill wont be to big to pay after i get pwned by arty  :P

ZabojczyKartofel #8 Posted 20 June 2011 - 06:57 AM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 19782 battles
  • 463
  • [7_FPS] 7_FPS
  • Member since:
    08-03-2010
Tier IX is M103
Tier X is T110   - I hope so that they wiil be good tanks, not like T34(but T30 is now OK).

Semaca #9 Posted 20 June 2011 - 07:10 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 16608 battles
  • 868
  • [JDER] JDER
  • Member since:
    10-19-2010
are these images xerox copies of screen pictures taken by cellphones?
anyway, where are the tracks?

ArtyomSTALKER #10 Posted 20 June 2011 - 07:23 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8532 battles
  • 1,337
  • Member since:
    05-04-2011
I took those images from some russian site i dont remembar now was long ago and since it is big talk about USA new tier 9 and 10 tanks coming i wanted to post some images, and images prolly were made by cell phone.

Intruder313 #11 Posted 20 June 2011 - 02:22 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 8641 battles
  • 950
  • Member since:
    01-10-2011
Yeah those pics have been doing the rounds for ages - they are the real-deal or at least was at the time it was taken.

The M103 was a real tank (they built around 300) while the T110 never made it to service (hence the designation "T"). The T110 is going to be the smallest of the Tier 10s I think.

Merc_Matt #12 Posted 20 June 2011 - 03:21 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 7896 battles
  • 168
  • Member since:
    08-03-2010
A game developer (SerB) stated that they most likely wont do anything about the commanders cupola (weakspot) and that we will have to "hide" it in combat, the usual "We dont give a shit about US tanks"

Zieten #13 Posted 20 June 2011 - 03:56 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 12994 battles
  • 2,158
  • Member since:
    08-02-2010

View PostMtemtko, on 20 June 2011 - 03:21 PM, said:

A game developer (SerB) stated that they most likely wont do anything about the commanders cupola (weakspot) and that we will have to "hide" it in combat, the usual "We dont give a shit about US tanks"

hah! thats awesome :D

Maye35 #14 Posted 20 June 2011 - 03:56 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 11743 battles
  • 79
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011

View PostMtemtko, on 20 June 2011 - 03:21 PM, said:

A game developer (SerB) stated that they most likely wont do anything about the commanders cupola (weakspot) and that we will have to "hide" it in combat, the usual "We dont give a shit about US tanks"

We don't know anything about thoose 2 tanks and you already cry ...


The T30 is already a tank made of paper so you should get used to it.

If the T110 get a good gun with a good rof, a good mobility and a small profile, it will be a nice tank, we can't complain about something witch have not been tested.

ArtyomSTALKER #15 Posted 20 June 2011 - 10:18 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8532 battles
  • 1,337
  • Member since:
    05-04-2011
For now i like the both tanks at least the looks hehe :Smile_honoring:

Redneck #16 Posted 21 June 2011 - 06:59 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 20026 battles
  • 1,331
  • Member since:
    08-17-2010
small profile??? have u seen the turret lol and how in the devil 7 names aer we supposed to hide a commander coppula?? that means hide the whole F(word)ing Tank, thats a joke right? hide the coppule lmao

Third #17 Posted 21 June 2011 - 07:32 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 5931 battles
  • 115
  • Member since:
    10-02-2010
Cant wait.. And got sad once I found out that the m103 might not make it for 6.6  :mellow:

Zieten #18 Posted 21 June 2011 - 11:46 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 12994 battles
  • 2,158
  • Member since:
    08-02-2010

View PostRedneck, on 21 June 2011 - 06:59 AM, said:

small profile??? have u seen the turret lol and how in the devil 7 names aer we supposed to hide a commander coppula?? that means hide the whole F(word)ing Tank, thats a joke right? hide the coppule lmao

maybe with the new physics engine you can flip over your tank so that the cupola is hidden in a small hole in the ground, thus covering this weakspot while exposing the other small little weakspot US tanks got (the hull) a bit more ;)

RoyalBengalTiger #19 Posted 21 June 2011 - 11:29 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6921 battles
  • 576
  • Member since:
    04-19-2011
If that tank ever made it into production, the cupola would have been pretty thick to compensate the lack of slope. The machinegun turret will be just as much a weakness as the one on the M3 Medium- it'll hardly be a problem.

Knowing WoT, the cupola will be made thinner than the rest of the turret side, and it'll be painted in bright red.

bojan #20 Posted 22 June 2011 - 11:54 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 36943 battles
  • 692
  • [L-FEW] L-FEW
  • Member since:
    09-08-2010

View PostRoyalBengalTiger, on 21 June 2011 - 11:29 PM, said:

If that tank ever made it into production, the cupola would have been pretty thick to compensate the lack of slope.
Or not. M60 TC coupola was just 2" and it was produced as such.