Jump to content


Next Campaign


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

GuardianJH #1 Posted 01 December 2014 - 08:23 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 45707 battles
  • 5
  • [VSOP] VSOP
  • Member since:
    11-25-2012
I hope next  time we see campaign Tiers 5,7,9

Monster95alpha19 #2 Posted 01 December 2014 - 04:12 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 35389 battles
  • 4,000
  • [TKEA] TKEA
  • Member since:
    10-28-2011

View PostGuardianJH, on 01 December 2014 - 07:23 AM, said:

I hope next  time we see campaign Tiers 5,7,9

 

just no..

Gharirey #3 Posted 01 December 2014 - 10:12 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 33777 battles
  • 265
  • Member since:
    07-02-2012

Hell no! Tier VI is retarded enough with its pew-pew meta, no need to go even lower.

 

I wouldn't mind seeing tier IX in a campaign, though. In my opinion, tiers 8, 9, 10 would make for a more interesting campaign than than tiers 6, 8,10. But this is unlikely to happen: 6, 8,10 have been established via strongholds, campaigns and 54/7 as the tiers used for organized play. Continuity may be boring but it saves us all a lot of credits (buying back tanks, retraining crews, ...).



Alteisen #4 Posted 02 December 2014 - 12:05 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 16738 battles
  • 1,292
  • Member since:
    10-04-2010

View PostGharirey, on 01 December 2014 - 09:12 PM, said:

Hell no! Tier VI is retarded enough with its pew-pew meta, no need to go even lower.

 

I wouldn't mind seeing tier IX in a campaign, though. In my opinion, tiers 8, 9, 10 would make for a more interesting campaign than than tiers 6, 8,10. But this is unlikely to happen: 6, 8,10 have been established via strongholds, campaigns and 54/7 as the tiers used for organized play. Continuity may be boring but it saves us all a lot of credits (buying back tanks, retraining crews, ...).

First campaign was from 1 to 10. It was horrible. 



Pips #5 Posted 02 December 2014 - 12:18 AM

    Brigadier

  • Beta Tester
  • 63442 battles
  • 4,264
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    09-11-2010
Tier 7 and 9 are great, it would be fun.

moe77 #6 Posted 02 December 2014 - 10:12 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13426 battles
  • 1,732
  • [7-7-7] 7-7-7
  • Member since:
    10-20-2011

Tier 9, yes.

Tier 7 idk...the balance differences are quite big and i guess Tigers+M41 would rule with maybe some T29s for Hulldown stuff.



Ajsich #7 Posted 08 December 2014 - 02:08 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30487 battles
  • 216
  • Member since:
    03-29-2013
GuardianJH, why did you even start this topic without proper OP? :P 
Just one short sentence? Come on, mate. You can do it much better. :)

I agree with guys above. Tier 6 is completely 'tarded, even though the first stage was quite OK for my clan. In tier 6 we were seeing pretty standard setups. LTs - T37. MTs Cromwell. HTs were quite different. There were KV-85s, T-150s, KV-2s and some ARL 44s. More or less ‚‚only" 5 or 6 tanks + FV304 arty. In tier 8 we had every ESL tank (at least 10 as far as I can count) + many arties from almost every single country with SPG (5). I guess tier 10 will be even more fun.

These odd tiers (5,7,9) are far from balanced. Tier 9 would see only 4-5 tanks: ST-1, E75, T-54, T54E1 and only one arty which would be the American one which is quite frequently used in tier 10 battles.

Dr_Zap #8 Posted 11 December 2014 - 05:58 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 57010 battles
  • 1,539
  • [HE-JA] HE-JA
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
And tier 7 would be flooded by Bulldogs....

7LV #9 Posted 15 December 2014 - 09:38 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18241 battles
  • 1,646
  • Member since:
    05-05-2012

View PostPanzerZap, on 11 December 2014 - 04:58 PM, said:

And tier 7 would be flooded by Bulldogs....

 

and what's wrong with that? WG working as intended. Campaign IV  roll on ...... like the pipe piper.

j/k course I know what's wrong, same as the arrogant replies in this forum from players thinking their GOD.



Dr__Kiwi #10 Posted 16 December 2014 - 05:10 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 32829 battles
  • 173
  • Member since:
    11-07-2012
So much butthurt going on!

dacorny #11 Posted 17 December 2014 - 02:44 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 42347 battles
  • 578
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    07-16-2011
Anyone who remembers the first campaign where every tier was played, will curse you.

kariverson #12 Posted 19 December 2014 - 12:37 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 37722 battles
  • 441
  • [NOS] NOS
  • Member since:
    10-10-2012
I liked the first campaign with all the tiers, don't hate :ohmy:

Meista #13 Posted 19 December 2014 - 01:15 AM

    Corporal

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 80681 battles
  • 164
  • [EX-4A] EX-4A
  • Member since:
    03-04-2012

next campaign:01.01.2016



Dongfeng_division #14 Posted 20 December 2014 - 11:57 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 44384 battles
  • 2,291
  • Member since:
    07-20-2011

View Postkariverson, on 19 December 2014 - 12:37 AM, said:

I liked the first campaign with all the tiers, don't hate :ohmy:

 

Because it was fun and refreshing. But most people just like playing same 3 tanks and same 3 tiers over and over.

Edited by Dongfeng_division, 20 December 2014 - 12:03 PM.


maroar #15 Posted 20 December 2014 - 02:48 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29488 battles
  • 2,462
  • [G__G] G__G
  • Member since:
    10-02-2012

View PostAjsich, on 08 December 2014 - 02:08 PM, said:

Tier 9 would see only 4-5 tanks: ST-1, E75, T-54, T54E1 and only one arty which would be the American one which is quite frequently used in tier 10 battles.

 

+ AMX50120

And some maps: VK4502B, M103, WZ-111-1-4, WZ-120, Lorraine 40t, T30, Obj 704

Maybe even E50 and M46 patton (thanks to their amazing DPM for T9)

 

I would love to see T9 in a campaign.

 

T7 I liked in the first campaign.

The HTs were mostly IS/IS2 and T29, but with the buff on the Tiger 1 it would be a more interesting mix I think, all sorts of TDs were used.

Right now I think that the T7 meds and lights will all be replaced with M41s (which in the first campaign were 1375s/T71s + T20/T-34-1/T-43), so that would be a bit of a shame for me.

 


Edited by maroar, 20 December 2014 - 02:56 PM.


Gandd #16 Posted 23 December 2014 - 12:51 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28959 battles
  • 279
  • Member since:
    02-12-2011

Well every Campaign should be based on the Tier of the reward tank you get.

So if the reward tank is a Tier8 you play Campaign with T8 if the reward tank is Tier10 play Campaign with T10. and so on.

 



babuuni #17 Posted 02 January 2015 - 05:16 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13143 battles
  • 997
  • Member since:
    01-13-2013
There should be a whole minicampaign just for tier 9.

Horrible_Player #18 Posted 04 January 2015 - 01:48 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 29443 battles
  • 502
  • Member since:
    01-27-2011

View Postkariverson, on 19 December 2014 - 12:37 AM, said:

I liked the first campaign with all the tiers, don't hate :ohmy:

 

Oh good lord, meeting an entire team of 15 PZ I C's with my lonely Pz II J and watching them panic  because they can't hurt me....Best.Battle.Ever

Tarantula_xD #19 Posted 05 January 2015 - 08:24 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 19323 battles
  • 1,060
  • [MSGA] MSGA
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

View Postbabuuni, on 02 January 2015 - 04:16 PM, said:

There should be a whole minicampaign just for tier 9.

 

Good idea.

 

I wouldnt mind seeing 15x E50 



babuuni #20 Posted 05 January 2015 - 08:40 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13143 battles
  • 997
  • Member since:
    01-13-2013

View PostTarantula, on 05 January 2015 - 09:24 AM, said:

 

Good idea.

 

I wouldnt mind seeing 15x E50 

 

Me neither.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users