Jump to content


matchmaker


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

Poll: matchmaker (8 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

do you think matchmaker should be remaked?

  1. yes (7 votes [87.50%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 87.50%

  2. no (1 vote [12.50%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

why?

  1. too strong oponents (2 votes [20.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  2. too bad teammates (5 votes [50.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  3. for simular teams (3 votes [30.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 30.00%

Vote Hide poll

rxnos8 #1 Posted 08 December 2014 - 04:40 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11216 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011

i think that mm should be remade because:

1) we need simular teams

2) that most of team doesnt have much beter or much worst stats

3) just want normal playing with non noob and non pros in team.

 

i want all to vote for this. 

 



KptStrzyga #2 Posted 08 December 2014 - 05:31 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33333 battles
  • 15,649
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-19-2011

Biased poll is biased. I don`t like any of answers in second part so I can`t vote. 

 



_Antipathy #3 Posted 08 December 2014 - 07:38 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 651 battles
  • 6,921
  • Member since:
    10-29-2013
My internet is going really slow, I'll make a thread about it.

KyndaT58 #4 Posted 08 December 2014 - 07:52 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 20860 battles
  • 117
  • [YATTA] YATTA
  • Member since:
    04-22-2014

View Post_Antipathy, on 08 December 2014 - 08:38 PM, said:

My internet is going really slow, I'll make a thread about it.

 

Good idea.

I'll make one too a day, or two later cause I have the same problem.



LeMoron #5 Posted 08 December 2014 - 07:53 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 2460 battles
  • 636
  • Member since:
    06-13-2012
Pretty much all of the three reasons you listed are the same thing.

Schmeksiman #6 Posted 08 December 2014 - 10:11 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 16280 battles
  • 6,601
  • [INC] INC
  • Member since:
    03-10-2012
If I had a Euro for each post about matchmaking I'd be sitting in SerB's place right now...

_Antipathy #7 Posted 08 December 2014 - 10:15 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 651 battles
  • 6,921
  • Member since:
    10-29-2013

View PostSchmeksiman, on 08 December 2014 - 09:11 PM, said:

If I had half a cent for each post about matchmaking I'd be sitting in SerB's place right now...

 

Better.



Olina102 #8 Posted 09 December 2014 - 11:59 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 53878 battles
  • 11
  • Member since:
    05-02-2012

WG ist zu dumm um ein gescheiten MM zu erstellen weil das in Ihren Augen kein Geld bringt. Wenn das Team aussieht wie Dreck dann schieben Sie es einfach auf ein "Sonderfall".

Gerade zwei Beispiele innerhalb von 30 min. 4 gegen 7 Tier 10 im anderen Spiel 6 gegen 8. Btw am liebsten sind mir die Spiele wo es auf einer Seite keine Scouts oder Meds gibt.

Ein Tip wie immer an WG: Bitte mehr solcher Rekritierungsprogramme-fühle mich gleich besser wenn ich weiß dass Ihr nur von der Anzahle der Accounts lebt egal ob inaktiv oder botverseucht. Hm...vllt läßt sich so das Unternehmen besser verkaufen-Facebook macht es ja vor.

 

MfG

 

 



John_Preston #9 Posted 09 December 2014 - 12:12 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 17436 battles
  • 6,373
  • Member since:
    10-13-2012
This is not an off-topic thread though. OP should start a new one in the general discussion. :P




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users