Jump to content


3rd Campaign cheating or?!


  • Please log in to reply
53 replies to this topic

The007thDreeson #1 Posted 15 December 2014 - 08:32 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39214 battles
  • 914
  • [METOO] METOO
  • Member since:
    02-17-2012
I noticed something on 3rd Campaign map,for 2nd day now..clans from same community makeing encounters so i think we r not stup** so that can't be delay chips..
I can see big number of good clans heaving  struggle to win few tanks more so if this clans fixing battles,in my opinion it is not cool from them..



Still dont know should i send this to support to 
investigate,or not...

Edited by bobox13, 15 December 2014 - 08:34 PM.


SirMustache #2 Posted 15 December 2014 - 09:22 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 39974 battles
  • 308
  • [TRIGG] TRIGG
  • Member since:
    10-01-2011
lol stronku

K0bra #3 Posted 15 December 2014 - 09:44 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 20526 battles
  • 127
  • Member since:
    08-10-2010

Looks ....

Unbelieveable.

I hope Wargaming looks over it and check this.Cant image PZK make bad stuff.


Edited by K0bra, 15 December 2014 - 10:04 PM.


Dzwonowo #4 Posted 15 December 2014 - 10:07 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Clan Commander
  • 32555 battles
  • 64
  • [AAP] AAP
  • Member since:
    07-02-2011

It is very easy to check those clans on your own, just analyze page like this - http://eu.wargaming....917/famepoints/ (it is my own clan, so no naming&shaming). If they have points from the battles OP mentioned, sth smells here suspiciously.

 

But - generally speaking - clans, that cooperate on map, might also exchange encounters between each other just to cover themselves and maybe decide after prime time who will fight on which province, giving appropriate technical victory depending on that decision.



The007thDreeson #5 Posted 15 December 2014 - 10:12 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39214 battles
  • 914
  • [METOO] METOO
  • Member since:
    02-17-2012

View PostDzwonowo, on 15 December 2014 - 10:07 PM, said:

It is very easy to check those clans on your own, just analyze page like this - http://eu.wargaming....917/famepoints/ (it is my own clan, so no naming&shaming). If they have points from the battles OP mentioned, sth smells here suspiciously.

 

But - generally speaking - clans, that cooperate on map, might also exchange encounters between each other just to cover themselves and maybe decide after prime time who will fight on which province, giving appropriate technical victory depending on that decision.

 

didn't know for that,but still yesterday 1 guy took 4k points in that encounter and today 600...that means they still played against their own clan

[EDIT] but i find out that they played against each other on Western Tombouctou  province (Today at 21:39) PZK took 140k points and PZK-X took 20k points

Edited by bobox13, 15 December 2014 - 10:20 PM.


Time_To_BurN #6 Posted 15 December 2014 - 10:30 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 28783 battles
  • 183
  • Member since:
    06-01-2013

View Postbobox13, on 15 December 2014 - 10:12 PM, said:

 

didn't know for that,but still yesterday 1 guy took 4k points in that encounter and today 600...that means they still played against their own clan

[EDIT] but i find out that they played against each other on Western Tombouctou  province (Today at 21:39) PZK took 140k points and PZK-X took 20k points

 

Well at least they fought. :trollface:

Edited by Div1nus, 15 December 2014 - 10:31 PM.


The007thDreeson #7 Posted 15 December 2014 - 10:35 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39214 battles
  • 914
  • [METOO] METOO
  • Member since:
    02-17-2012

View PostDiv1nus, on 15 December 2014 - 10:30 PM, said:

 

20K points for the weaker clan...

 

PZK-X is stronger by stats,and had more provinces,and has more players in tenk,+ all that players are above 100k points...i'm still not saying that they are cheating,just that it is little weird to me

PZK-A today played on riot at PZK-X province Southeastern Tombouctou and tok 142k points against them..

Edited by bobox13, 15 December 2014 - 10:35 PM.


maroar #8 Posted 15 December 2014 - 11:19 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29488 battles
  • 2,462
  • [G__G] G__G
  • Member since:
    10-02-2012

They did these battles in previous campaigns as well, WG didnt see anything wrong with it apparently.

Just like there was nothing wrong with what got leaked from a famous clan and it's sister clan this campaign, nothing was wrong there either.



The007thDreeson #9 Posted 15 December 2014 - 11:44 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39214 battles
  • 914
  • [METOO] METOO
  • Member since:
    02-17-2012
i still can't say that they are fixing battles,maybe they have proof that they didn't do that...like replays,i would rly like to get that 2 replays from that 2 battles...don't know what else to say..

[EDIT] even if they are playing real battles against their community,i think that is not cool...

Edited by bobox13, 15 December 2014 - 11:50 PM.


Sekundenkleber #10 Posted 15 December 2014 - 11:48 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 50327 battles
  • 170
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    07-01-2011
PZK cheating again wuuuut? Kappa

Paozx #11 Posted 15 December 2014 - 11:48 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11513 battles
  • 637
  • Member since:
    02-14-2013

View Postmaroar, on 15 December 2014 - 11:19 PM, said:

They did these battles in previous campaigns as well,

 

I call them out for that in every random where i meet them but still they dont give a [edited].

 

As i said in another thread the sanctions and investigations regarding campaign and rigged battles are P A T H E T I C.

 



KABINE10 #12 Posted 16 December 2014 - 04:01 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 46571 battles
  • 734
  • [RSOP] RSOP
  • Member since:
    11-13-2011
nothing wrong with that, they are not top clan so WG intrested is close to zero. OR maybe they fought good battle but team X went to TS and said stop shooting.. nothing wronk in that either.
the reality is WG is and always be a business. they care about money .. more happy customers more money.. and those happy customers comes mainly for "not so good clans" cos they are unable to farm gold in global map.. (our team is happy customer clan aswell)

Xensation #13 Posted 16 December 2014 - 05:23 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Clan Commander
  • 15736 battles
  • 7,712
  • Member since:
    06-08-2012
I don't think it's a problem to agree on fights with subclans or allies as long as they're legit fights and the winner is not negotiated beforehand. We agreed on legit fights with F15 the other day, because both parties needed the fights, but did not want a full-scale war (yet).

OlFson #14 Posted 16 December 2014 - 08:32 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28634 battles
  • 829
  • [SRSLY] SRSLY
  • Member since:
    06-24-2011

Looking at the map, the intention of the op becomes questionable since he is fighting in the same area.....

 



The007thDreeson #15 Posted 16 December 2014 - 10:27 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39214 battles
  • 914
  • [METOO] METOO
  • Member since:
    02-17-2012

View PostXensation, on 16 December 2014 - 05:23 AM, said:

I don't think it's a problem to agree on fights with subclans or allies as long as they're legit fights and the winner is not negotiated beforehand. We agreed on legit fights with F15 the other day, because both parties needed the fights, but did not want a full-scale war (yet).


In my opinion that is ok if u r not fixing battles and don't have anyone else to attack around u,but they had enough place to attack around,and still puted chips on their own community...
We had TES-F next to us (our friendly clan) and we didn't have any battle on same province with them...and we still had enough to attack at least 3-4 provinces



maroar #16 Posted 16 December 2014 - 12:37 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29488 battles
  • 2,462
  • [G__G] G__G
  • Member since:
    10-02-2012

View PostOlFson, on 16 December 2014 - 08:32 AM, said:

Looking at the map, the intention of the op becomes questionable since he is fighting in the same area.....

 

 

Dont you remember the stronk replay of the PZK clans in the previous campaign?

It was on mountain pass and somehow the strategy for both teams was to drive into the middle valley with MAUSes ;D



Yozzman #17 Posted 16 December 2014 - 12:42 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 20461 battles
  • 309
  • Member since:
    09-30-2010

View Postbobox13, on 15 December 2014 - 08:32 PM, said:

I noticed something on 3rd Campaign map,for 2nd day now..clans from same community makeing encounters so i think we r not stup** so that can't be delay chips..
I can see big number of good clans heaving  struggle to win few tanks more so if this clans fixing battles,in my opinion it is not cool from them..



Still dont know should i send this to support to 
investigate,or not...

 

We should have YARLY and ORLY next to us...

Fake battles FTW! :girl:



The007thDreeson #18 Posted 16 December 2014 - 01:48 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39214 battles
  • 914
  • [METOO] METOO
  • Member since:
    02-17-2012

View PostYozzman, on 16 December 2014 - 12:42 PM, said:

 

We should have YARLY and ORLY next to us...

Fake battles FTW! :girl:

 

PATO would win most tanks than..

[EDIT] I see that guys from PZK are reading this topic,so i hope that they will post at least that 2 replays PZK vs PZK-X and PZK-X vs PZK-A (from yesterday),and prove that i'm possibly wrong or i ll probably send this to WG support today...

Edited by bobox13, 16 December 2014 - 01:58 PM.


frenchy79 #19 Posted 16 December 2014 - 02:49 PM

    Private

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 19725 battles
  • 39
  • Member since:
    08-23-2011

View Postmaroar, on 16 December 2014 - 11:37 AM, said:

 

Dont you remember the stronk replay of the PZK clans in the previous campaign?

It was on mountain pass and somehow the strategy for both teams was to drive into the middle valley with MAUSes ;D

 

Except it wasn't PZK. It was another clan as seen in the image below!

 

Topic can be found here: http://forum.worldof...st__460#topmost

 

 


Edited by frenchy79, 16 December 2014 - 02:49 PM.


suppenschlund #20 Posted 16 December 2014 - 02:51 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 48088 battles
  • 504
  • [PZK] PZK
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012

Cool down guys....like any other tactical move, delays, nap etc that bring advantages battles against Community Clans are legitimized by the rules. So it never can be cheating or anything like that. Just maximizing the FP is not allowed. That we PZK-X try to help our community is daily routine and many clans do it in different ways. Any delay any nap etc is an advantage other clans maybe dont use but thats not my problem like it isn´t yours. As long as u handle in the context of the rules there is nothing wrong. WG showed that they observe what happens on the wm but we never had any problems cause we do nothin illegal.

Block Quote

 It was on mountain pass and somehow the strategy for both teams was to drive into the middle valley with MAUSes ;D

 

:facepalm: SBP vs K-K get banned for that?!

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users