Jump to content


AMX-30 1st Prototype


  • Please log in to reply
90 replies to this topic

armholeeio #41 Posted 14 March 2015 - 04:35 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17902 battles
  • 519
  • Member since:
    09-30-2012

at work so ha e I gor sommView PostCurseOfDeath, on 14 March 2015 - 01:47 PM, said:

Patch 9.7 is now live, can someone who downloaded it already post the xp cost of Amx 30 Prototype researched from Amx 13 90 ?

Test server or full thing? just at work, have I something to look forward to post 12hrs of shite

 



TacPenguin #42 Posted 14 March 2015 - 05:02 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 45627 battles
  • 1,639
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011

View PostCurseOfDeath, on 14 March 2015 - 01:47 PM, said:

Patch 9.7 is now live, can someone who downloaded it already post the xp cost of Amx 30 Prototype researched from Amx 13 90 ?

 

Amx 30 proto is 197,300 exp.   3,550,000 purchase price.  

 



tonce #43 Posted 14 March 2015 - 09:07 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 42801 battles
  • 626
  • Member since:
    02-02-2011
I play couple games whit this tank and he remind me on fast version of Japan Type 61,whil little beter relode time & little worst travers speed and better armor 

Edited by tonce, 14 March 2015 - 09:08 PM.


Judqment8 #44 Posted 14 March 2015 - 09:18 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 23824 battles
  • 3,988
  • Member since:
    09-21-2011

What happened to this turret that I was looking forward seeing:

 

I would have rather had this version as the elite AMX 30 PT. It's lame that it gets the same elite turret as on the B version minus the "baskets". 


Also the traverse on the AMX 30 PT is pretty horrible. Doesn't really get the agile breeze I get with mah PTA.



Lil_Nas_X #45 Posted 14 March 2015 - 09:48 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33177 battles
  • 4,203
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013

I'm sorry but I prefer the current turret. As a bit of difference it's nice but I think that turret is kinda ugly.

 

View PostJudqment8, on 14 March 2015 - 08:18 PM, said:

Also the traverse on the AMX 30 PT is pretty horrible. Doesn't really get the agile breeze I get with mah PTA.

 

I noticed that as well, it's not exactly as nimble as the Leopards.


Edited by Loekie5500, 14 March 2015 - 09:49 PM.


Maauru #46 Posted 15 March 2015 - 09:35 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22354 battles
  • 823
  • Member since:
    03-29-2014

View PostJudqment8, on 08 March 2015 - 07:39 PM, said:

 

Well that sounds completely ****** up. The F3 has no place on a tier 9 medium tank. Not that any tier 9 medium is good at stock, but that 90mm would be plain ridiculous. WG will be like "but you can always use some gold and convert experience, right?".

 

I checked on test and 90mm F3 is really stock gun for T9.

However, there is upgrade option before top gun and that is 100mm SA47, 300DMG and 232PEN which is same gun that Lorr and AMX 50 100 use.

So, if somebody have AMX 50 100 or Lorr already researched he will not have to use 90mm F3.

Bad here is that 100mm gun require tracks upgrade before it can be mounted so that is 24k XP for tracks before upgrading gun.



Judqment8 #47 Posted 15 March 2015 - 10:23 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 23824 battles
  • 3,988
  • Member since:
    09-21-2011

View PostMaauru, on 15 March 2015 - 10:35 AM, said:

 

I checked on test and 90mm F3 is really stock gun for T9.

However, there is upgrade option before top gun and that is 100mm SA47, 300DMG and 232PEN which is same gun that Lorr and AMX 50 100 use.

So, if somebody have AMX 50 100 or Lorr already researched he will not have to use 90mm F3.

Bad here is that 100mm gun require tracks upgrade before it can be mounted so that is 24k XP for tracks before upgrading gun.

 

Like me. I don't have AMX 100 or Lorraine 40t. WG is really needing the money it seems. Forcing another really crappy stock grind in hopes for people converting free EXP. That's just disgusting.



Lil_Nas_X #48 Posted 15 March 2015 - 11:42 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33177 battles
  • 4,203
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013

View PostJudqment8, on 15 March 2015 - 09:23 AM, said:

 

Like me. I don't have AMX 100 or Lorraine 40t. WG is really needing the money it seems. Forcing another really crappy stock grind in hopes for people converting free EXP. That's just disgusting.

 

As if nerfing every tier 10 TD and MT pen values wasn't disgusting enough. 

Judqment8 #49 Posted 15 March 2015 - 03:03 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 23824 battles
  • 3,988
  • Member since:
    09-21-2011

View PostLoekie5500, on 15 March 2015 - 12:42 PM, said:

 

As if nerfing every tier 10 TD and MT pen values wasn't disgusting enough. 

 

That's a real joke. Nerfing the normal ammo and not touching the real problem, the gold shells at all. Then claim that they will nerf those too. Why not then nerf them both at the same time? And really, I'm so sick of the Russian meds starting from tier 8 to have access to the 330 HEAT PEN. That's Russian bias at its finest. The tanks with lowest normal penetration get more gold pen than the AMX-30 which currently has the highest medium penetration.

storm4710 #50 Posted 15 March 2015 - 03:14 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19175 battles
  • 739
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    12-21-2012

my first look at the new tier 9 and 10


Edited by storm4710, 16 March 2015 - 07:38 AM.


CN1994 #51 Posted 15 March 2015 - 04:52 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26760 battles
  • 1,812
  • Member since:
    05-07-2011

View PostJudqment8, on 08 March 2015 - 08:39 PM, said:

Well that sounds completely ****** up. The F3 has no place on a tier 9 medium tank. Not that any tier 9 medium is good at stock, but that 90mm would be plain ridiculous. WG will be like "but you can always use some gold and convert experience, right?".

Lorraine says hello.

 

View PostJudqment8, on 15 March 2015 - 10:23 AM, said:

 

Like me. I don't have AMX 100 or Lorraine 40t. WG is really needing the money it seems. Forcing another really crappy stock grind in hopes for people converting free EXP. That's just disgusting.

Had the Lorraine first and it was painful. Bought it with some free XP after that.



storm4710 #52 Posted 16 March 2015 - 07:39 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19175 battles
  • 739
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    12-21-2012

View Poststorm4710, on 15 March 2015 - 03:14 PM, said:

my first look at the new tier 9 and 10

 

updated the video higher sound

Lil_Nas_X #53 Posted 16 March 2015 - 06:36 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33177 battles
  • 4,203
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013

View PostCN1994, on 15 March 2015 - 03:52 PM, said:

Lorraine says hello.

 

Had the Lorraine first and it was painful. Bought it with some free XP after that.

 

In the Lorraine it's an autoloader. 13 90 with same gun is sorta capable in high tier matchups.

MrBiceps93 #54 Posted 17 March 2015 - 11:05 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 17408 battles
  • 6
  • [PR_PH] PR_PH
  • Member since:
    10-23-2012
[edited]

Edited by EilaAurora, 17 March 2015 - 07:05 PM.
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content. An official notification has also been sent. ~EilaAurora


TaHko3d #55 Posted 17 March 2015 - 11:45 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22751 battles
  • 1,004
  • Member since:
    02-25-2014
amx30 1st prot is just awesome (at least for now), I think it's a much better alternative to M46 Patton.

Exozen #56 Posted 10 May 2015 - 10:20 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31671 battles
  • 1,079
  • Member since:
    08-16-2011

Traverse sucks yeah , but the damage taken from the ground in jumps and what not really boggles me , seriously made a 1 meters jump and lost 350 , next i speed on at 65 and i hit a super " break bump " and looses 200 hp. 

 

And then i go into the batchat , E-50m , Obj 140 , and i dive from cliffs without taking any damage at all , [edited][edited]..



DeathByDribbling #57 Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:13 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28806 battles
  • 1,504
  • Member since:
    09-06-2011

How much of an upgrade is the second turret?  Yes you get a slight dpm buff, and 100hp, however you gain an easy to hit hatch on top and loose 1 degree of turret depression.  With stock turret I have had a lot of success hull down - shooting enemy hatches while they don't shoot me (I suspect there's not enough sticking up to shoot).  Do I really want to loose depression and gain a hatch?



Exozen #58 Posted 11 May 2015 - 09:20 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31671 battles
  • 1,079
  • Member since:
    08-16-2011

View PostDeathByDribbling, on 11 May 2015 - 02:13 PM, said:

How much of an upgrade is the second turret?  Yes you get a slight dpm buff, and 100hp, however you gain an easy to hit hatch on top and loose 1 degree of turret depression.  With stock turret I have had a lot of success hull down - shooting enemy hatches while they don't shoot me (I suspect there's not enough sticking up to shoot).  Do I really want to loose depression and gain a hatch?

 

Doesnt mather , your turret gets overmatched by any gun and will only bounce very lucky shots straight to the mantlet , besides , you are not fighting at close distances with this tank anyways. 3rd line sniper.

KillSlim #59 Posted 13 May 2015 - 05:52 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 15436 battles
  • 414
  • Member since:
    03-25-2011
I've now unlocked every module apart from the top radio on my 1er, and I'm enjoying playing in it but I am always punished by horrendous RNG. Fully aimed stationary shots with the enemy tank being covered by most of the aiming reticule will just miss. A clanmate of mine is experiencing the same thing with the 1er. Is anyone else seeing this too?

p33l0x #60 Posted 14 May 2015 - 02:36 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 25041 battles
  • 207
  • Member since:
    01-18-2012

I've been playing AMX30 proto for some time now, I'm certainly enjoying it more than leopard PTA. It is not as nimble as the leopard, but aim time seems to be better and the gun depression rocks. ROF is quite a lot better, in PTA i remember it being over 11s without rammer! Also, the turret is surprisingly bouncy especially against low tier noob guns.

 

I suggest mounting the additional springs to ease the grind. I free xp'd the turret and the top gun, and then ground the tracks. Even without free xp the additional springs enable you to mount the lorry gun with the stock suspension.

The top engine seems almost 100% [edited]upgrade. 32kXP for 700kg less engine weight, which works out as roughly 2% improvement in HP/tons. No thanks. Maybe I'll research it once I have AMX30B open, If the proto ends up being "keeper" quality.

 

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users