Jump to content


Strongholds: Airstrike and Artillery Strike


  • Please log in to reply
67 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 09 February 2015 - 03:13 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 25,030
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Read now to learn all about the two new Reserves coming to the Strongholds game mode!

Full news text


wsatnutter #2 Posted 09 February 2015 - 03:42 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 24234 battles
  • 7,194
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010
this will be interesting to say the least

JonSnow_ #3 Posted 09 February 2015 - 03:44 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 23042 battles
  • 96
  • Member since:
    02-06-2011
TOTAL FAIL

WeekendWarrior #4 Posted 09 February 2015 - 03:51 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 2357 battles
  • 122
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    03-20-2013
Neilloss46 delete all comments

Edited by RespectYourEnemy, 09 February 2015 - 04:27 PM.
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content. Neilloss46


Executi0neR #5 Posted 09 February 2015 - 03:54 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 17478 battles
  • 130
  • Member since:
    03-20-2012
How about introduce another building which provides you nuke support to blow whole map up?

Edited by Executi0neR, 09 February 2015 - 03:58 PM.


BigFatty #6 Posted 09 February 2015 - 04:05 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 37857 battles
  • 13
  • [OPFS] OPFS
  • Member since:
    06-14-2013
Who wants this in the game?

Salsify #7 Posted 09 February 2015 - 04:08 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9480 battles
  • 575
  • Member since:
    12-05-2013

Part of the airstrike table doesn't make sense "Radius of destruction (metres2)"

 

How can a radius be measured in square metres?



OdensSpear #8 Posted 09 February 2015 - 04:26 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 16557 battles
  • 39
  • [WU_PA] WU_PA
  • Member since:
    05-15-2011

I dont think this will be something anyone will enjoy... I play this game becuse I like driving and fighting with tanks. Now with this off map feature, will this make my gameplay more fun? I will get nuked by something I cant shoot back at. This mean I will waste a lot of gametime looking at my burning knocked out tank from a totally pointless feature, run by AI. Please focus time and resources on creating fun and interesting gameplay for us as tankdrivers, not AI off map features made to ruin our fun and the game.

 

 

 



_EnJoYkA_ #9 Posted 09 February 2015 - 05:18 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 31237 battles
  • 881
  • Member since:
    02-18-2012

View PostSalsify, on 09 February 2015 - 04:08 PM, said:

Part of the airstrike table doesn't make sense "Radius of destruction (metres2)"

 

How can a radius be measured in square metres?

 



chakmarin #10 Posted 09 February 2015 - 05:47 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 27976 battles
  • 260
  • Member since:
    12-15-2012
This is [edited]!

GTRaPToR #11 Posted 09 February 2015 - 05:52 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 20143 battles
  • 2,401
  • [UEA] UEA
  • Member since:
    03-03-2012

View PostOdensSpear, on 09 February 2015 - 05:26 PM, said:

I dont think this will be something anyone will enjoy... I play this game becuse I like driving and fighting with tanks. Now with this off map feature, will this make my gameplay more fun? I will get nuked by something I cant shoot back at. This mean I will waste a lot of gametime looking at my burning knocked out tank from a totally pointless feature, run by AI. Please focus time and resources on creating fun and interesting gameplay for us as tankdrivers, not AI off map features made to ruin our fun and the game.

 

 

 

Noone asks you to play Stronghold mode.



Tarantula_xD #12 Posted 09 February 2015 - 06:47 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 19323 battles
  • 1,060
  • [MSGA] MSGA
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011
Outside of wrecking campers on mountain pass i see very little use of this

Vonslap #13 Posted 09 February 2015 - 06:52 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 28575 battles
  • 82
  • [96ERS] 96ERS
  • Member since:
    08-16-2010
So why bother with tanks at all? Just sit around targeting the squares that everyone knows contain TDs, or advancing tanks, going 'KABOOM', like playing 'Battleships'? Surely the game is based on the skill and ingenuity of the players, and not off map 'barrages', nor aircraft that cant be engaged and shot down? 

ArmyDogtag #14 Posted 09 February 2015 - 08:56 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 16459 battles
  • 14
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011

View PostSalsify, on 09 February 2015 - 03:08 PM, said:

Part of the airstrike table doesn't make sense "Radius of destruction (metres2)"

 

How can a radius be measured in square metres?

 

Meanwhile in Soviet Russia, the radius is being measured in m²... LeL. On a more serious note, I though about it, but couldn‘t figure out what they meant by that :/...



maxim131 #15 Posted 09 February 2015 - 09:12 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3374 battles
  • 376
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013
No please, even if i never played strongholds, those things Going to be even more Worse than annoying arttilery one-shoting you while you are at full hp and you are about to kill some one.

Alteisen #16 Posted 09 February 2015 - 09:44 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 16738 battles
  • 1,292
  • Member since:
    10-04-2010
Well, this takes skirmish raids to a whole new level.

Oh, in case you missed it, WG is basically allowing weaker clans to upgrade their strongholds to higher levels by letting the defender bombard the enemy to kingdom come. (For reference, google what the British did for a week at the Battle of the Somme)

lnfernaI #17 Posted 09 February 2015 - 10:15 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 27888 battles
  • 3,193
  • [ALLGE] ALLGE
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

#WG

You could not think of something cleverer?

Maybe an Ion Cannon?

Maybe a Black Hole?

(Ironizing about your dumb ideas.)



Trakais #18 Posted 09 February 2015 - 11:53 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34129 battles
  • 1,035
  • Member since:
    03-17-2011
Michael Bay would be proud...

CroPanzer #19 Posted 09 February 2015 - 11:55 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 19667 battles
  • 991
  • [CARAS] CARAS
  • Member since:
    07-01-2010
Can't wait to see it raining bombs :trollface:

H311fi5h #20 Posted 10 February 2015 - 12:11 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 41315 battles
  • 1,053
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

Block Quote

 After the Commander's tank is destroyed in battle, no Reserves can be deployed.

 

Why would you do this...

I am usually commanding battles driving a heavy tank, leading the charge quite often myself. This is just major bs.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users