Jump to content


T-34-3 POST 9.6

T-34-3 POST 9.6 T-34-3 9.6 Worth it

  • Please log in to reply
58 replies to this topic

eMDB #1 Posted 12 February 2015 - 05:05 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 2700 battles
  • 111
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    08-14-2014

Yes, the T-34-3 is finally competitive!

Spoiler

Since the patch the gun is more accurate while sniping but less reliable with snapshotting from range and within close range. What do you guys think? I think she is worth her money now.

 

Pro's

Big gun with 390 alpha which overmatches a lot by 122mm.

Since 9.6 you can snipe reasonably with it.

Fast and nimble platform with really good camo value.

Good viewrange with 380 meters.

Crew training and good money maker + easy to get a pretty good WN8 with it.

Semi-Unique.

Strong and sloped turret armor.

 

Cons

Weak hull sides which gets overmatched

Vulnerable to module and crew damage and especially the engine with fire.

Gun, no brawler and no sniper because of low dpm, bad accuracy and soft stats(the gun is a paradox).

Worst gun depression possible, I think it is -3.

 

When to buy? If you are a players who knows how the spotting systems works, loves a challenge and is able to handle the gun depression. The fun of this vehicle is in the challenge and the 390 alpha combined with very good camo. This way you can attack guerrilla style. The thank becomes effective when you have a 3 skill crew and use the following modules; Vertical stabilizer, Vents and Optics. Vents and Optics are optional and can be changed for Rammer and/or GLD.

 

I'm running my T-34-3 with VS, Vents and Optics and I changed my Fire Extinguisher for Rations. I am doing this because I don't have Rammer and still want to have an okay DPM. 

 

 


Edited by eMDB, 12 February 2015 - 05:37 PM.


Fluffy_The_Destroyer #2 Posted 14 February 2015 - 04:54 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 53 battles
  • 4,402
  • Member since:
    12-07-2014

Look at Tank Compare site and compare Type59 to this tank. then sit back and be amazed at how much the Type 59 is better in every single aspect. hope you enjoy your terrible Type59 copy cuz i sure as hell dont. the guns the main problem with its terrible gun handling. the guns nothing more than a curse on a good hull/turret combo which is still worse than Type 59. (100mm hull armor and 200mm turret armor and much more side armor because WG reasons).

 

The tanks a chore to play, not fun. its a good tank with a bad gun....and it looks sexy...


Edited by Fluffy_The_Destroyer, 14 February 2015 - 04:56 AM.


eMDB #3 Posted 14 February 2015 - 03:32 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 2700 battles
  • 111
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    08-14-2014

It isn't as bad as you say. Since patch 9.6 I'm running at 3800 WN8 and have a 2000 dpg.

 

The T-34-3 is better because it is better at peek-a-booing with its massive alpha. Now stop comparing them because you cant! If you want a brawler you take the type, if you want a ambusher and run and gun tank you take the T-34-3.  Its only weakness is its penetration value and therefore it would be a bad buy if you want it as a credit farmer. This tank may cost money if you want good games!



Fluffy_The_Destroyer #4 Posted 15 February 2015 - 01:36 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 53 battles
  • 4,402
  • Member since:
    12-07-2014
The alpha is not the problem, its the horrific aimtime coupled with crippling -3 gundep and terrible pen that makes it bad.

eMDB #5 Posted 15 February 2015 - 12:49 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 2700 battles
  • 111
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    08-14-2014
It is the same as the IS-6 and 112 but on a more mobile platform which is able to flank.

Fluffy_The_Destroyer #6 Posted 16 February 2015 - 01:19 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 53 battles
  • 4,402
  • Member since:
    12-07-2014
IS-6 and 112 are heavy tanks with armor/more HP they can angle to bounce shots and take there time to aim that way. T-34-3 cannot take a hit even with its tiny increase of armor over T-34-2. not to mention its chinese so most frontal hits will set you on fire with the first shot.

eMDB #7 Posted 16 February 2015 - 10:17 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 2700 battles
  • 111
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    08-14-2014
You are talking nonsense. Low penetration is okay on a heavy tank because it is has the time to aim? But it can't penetrate an IS-6 or IS-3 reliable...

Signal11th #8 Posted 16 February 2015 - 12:31 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 40099 battles
  • 6,213
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    07-14-2011
You can't polish sh*t is the saying that springs to mind.

Fluffy_The_Destroyer #9 Posted 16 February 2015 - 12:42 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 53 battles
  • 4,402
  • Member since:
    12-07-2014

View Postsignal11th, on 16 February 2015 - 12:31 PM, said:

You can't polish sh*t is the saying that springs to mind.

 

basically this lol....

 

@eMDB IS-6 gold ammo is APCR which is much better than the crappy HEAT T-34-3 gets, that alone makes it better.


Edited by Fluffy_The_Destroyer, 16 February 2015 - 12:44 PM.


eMDB #10 Posted 16 February 2015 - 03:08 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 2700 battles
  • 111
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    08-14-2014

View PostFluffy_The_Destroyer, on 16 February 2015 - 12:42 PM, said:

 

basically this lol....

 

@eMDB IS-6 gold ammo is APCR which is much better than the crappy HEAT T-34-3 gets, that alone makes it better.

 

Yeah, thats a good point. But still has crap aim-time and accuracy.

Fluffy_The_Destroyer #11 Posted 16 February 2015 - 03:24 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 53 battles
  • 4,402
  • Member since:
    12-07-2014

View PosteMDB, on 16 February 2015 - 03:08 PM, said:

 

Yeah, thats a good point. But still has crap aim-time and accuracy.

 

I love beating the snot out of T-34-3 and IS-6 users in my Spershing.. i love Spershing for the fact it forces 122mm users to aim for weak spots.. and fail all the time ahahaha.

eMDB #12 Posted 16 February 2015 - 03:58 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 2700 battles
  • 111
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    08-14-2014

View PostFluffy_The_Destroyer, on 16 February 2015 - 03:24 PM, said:

 

I love beating the snot out of T-34-3 and IS-6 users in my Spershing.. i love Spershing for the fact it forces 122mm users to aim for weak spots.. and fail all the time ahahaha.

 

Most over angle and I over match their side armor. Or just ignore them. I'm picking fights on my rules or else I will lose.

Cpt_Radkow #13 Posted 18 February 2015 - 07:21 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 13471 battles
  • 14
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012
T-34-3 is fun tank, but after 9.6 new 8 tier meds is badly overpriced. I want 3500g back from WG.

eMDB #14 Posted 19 February 2015 - 12:09 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 2700 battles
  • 111
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    08-14-2014
? Why ?

ChaosAeternus #15 Posted 19 February 2015 - 12:16 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13666 battles
  • 399
  • [XMR] XMR
  • Member since:
    01-16-2012
Because its not in any aspect better than CDC or STA-2 to justify 11k gold cost vs 7500g

Fluffy_The_Destroyer #16 Posted 19 February 2015 - 06:11 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 53 battles
  • 4,402
  • Member since:
    12-07-2014
I find it funny they reduced the price of panther88 over complaints but wont do the same to this tank that people have been complaining about since its release, yet they wont reduce its price still. The T-34-3 is a good tank with a poor handling gun with bad gold shells. just a poor mans type 59 in every aspect. but you can still have decent games in it when RNGesus is with you.

eMDB #17 Posted 19 February 2015 - 09:34 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 2700 battles
  • 111
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    08-14-2014

View PostFluffy_The_Destroyer, on 19 February 2015 - 06:11 AM, said:

I find it funny they reduced the price of panther88 over complaints but wont do the same to this tank that people have been complaining about since its release, yet they wont reduce its price still. The T-34-3 is a good tank with a poor handling gun with bad gold shells. just a poor mans type 59 in every aspect. but you can still have decent games in it when RNGesus is with you.

 

I think it is because of the good players who play this tank. I tried to get the MoE and that one is around 2.5k average damage, if it isn't higher! This tank is a deadly one if you want to use the premium shells.

Fluffy_The_Destroyer #18 Posted 19 February 2015 - 09:55 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 53 battles
  • 4,402
  • Member since:
    12-07-2014
I find AP more reliable. HEAT is just plain terrible.

eMDB #19 Posted 19 February 2015 - 11:51 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 2700 battles
  • 111
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    08-14-2014
Not against a IS-6 or IS-3 from the front or tier 9 heavy tanks.

Fluffy_The_Destroyer #20 Posted 19 February 2015 - 12:59 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 53 battles
  • 4,402
  • Member since:
    12-07-2014
I still dont trust HEAT.. not with this things gun handling.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users