Jump to content


Silentstalker's closing statement. When will WG realise?


  • Please log in to reply
97 replies to this topic

Dr_LoVe69_makesWoTgreat #21 Posted 06 March 2015 - 06:45 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Clan Commander
  • 55809 battles
  • 3,301
  • Member since:
    12-24-2010

View PostGrimdorf, on 06 March 2015 - 06:41 PM, said:

Nearly every single post I have seen of Edger2020's in the last few days has been insulting to SS and FTR, 

 

Where did I insulted him?

 

View PostGrimdorf, on 06 March 2015 - 06:41 PM, said:

No idea why he is on such a vendetta (hall of shame?)

 

I never been on HoS.

 

View PostGrimdorf, on 06 March 2015 - 06:42 PM, said:

You are getting boring

 

If you do not like than do not read, its that simple.



jabster #22 Posted 06 March 2015 - 06:52 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12771 battles
  • 26,279
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View Postedger2020, on 06 March 2015 - 05:45 PM, said:

 

Where did I insulted him?

 

*coughs* "Agreed, unlike him Rita does not have personal issues so she does not have to make blog a place for her vendetta."

Dr_LoVe69_makesWoTgreat #23 Posted 06 March 2015 - 07:02 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Clan Commander
  • 55809 battles
  • 3,301
  • Member since:
    12-24-2010

View Postjabster, on 06 March 2015 - 06:52 PM, said:

 

*coughs* "Agreed, unlike him Rita does not have personal issues so she does not have to make blog a place for her vendetta."

 

Language barrier. I wanted to say his issues as player with some other members of this community, not him as real person (I do not know him personally neither I am psychologist).

 

PS

this topic is about good Obsidan vs evil WG



Homer_J #24 Posted 06 March 2015 - 07:07 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Moderator
  • 32930 battles
  • 36,133
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postjabster, on 06 March 2015 - 05:52 PM, said:

 

*coughs* "Agreed, unlike him Rita does not have personal issues so she does not have to make blog a place for her vendetta."

 

That looks like a statement of fact rather than an insult.

 

SS had personal issues with EG:EU, he never made any secret of it.



jabster #25 Posted 06 March 2015 - 07:09 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12771 battles
  • 26,279
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View Postedger2020, on 06 March 2015 - 06:02 PM, said:

 

Language barrier. I wanted to say his issues as player with some other members of this community, not him as real person (I do not know him personally neither I am psychologist).

 

PS

this topic is about good Obsidan vs evil WG

 

Yes off course it was just the same as.

 

"So that's why you didn't have time to make one separate post on ftr to thank all those who make donations and supported you through patreon."

 

"Aren't you busy handling bans on AW forum to people who troll speak truth abut their new racist employee?"

 

"Some strange moral compass."

 

"Which strangely co-relates with him jumping into Gaijin payroll."

 

"So what did WG "lost" and Gaijin My.com gained?

Person who is:

  • Openly homphobic
  • Leaks personal information
  • Responsible for spreading cheats
  • Hates good players"

 



Lol_N00b #26 Posted 06 March 2015 - 07:09 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 8561 battles
  • 3,077
  • [BL33T] BL33T
  • Member since:
    09-03-2014

Which of those players should WG listen?

 

The arty lovers or the arty haters?

The skill-based MM lovers or the skill-based MM haters?

The XVM lovers of the XVM haters?

The RNG lovers or the RNG haters?

The gold ammo lovers or the gold ammo haters?

 

The player base is so divided that whatever part of the players WG would want to listen would just make the changes as unappealing to the other part. 

 



Dr_LoVe69_makesWoTgreat #27 Posted 06 March 2015 - 07:13 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Clan Commander
  • 55809 battles
  • 3,301
  • Member since:
    12-24-2010

View Postjabster, on 06 March 2015 - 07:09 PM, said:

"So that's why you didn't have time to make one separate post on ftr to thank all those who make donations and supported you through patreon."

 

"Aren't you busy handling bans on AW forum to people who troll speak truth abut their new racist employee?"

 

"Some strange moral compass."

 

"Which strangely co-relates with him jumping into Gaijin payroll."

 

"So what did WG "lost" and Gaijin My.com gained?

Person who is:

  • Openly homphobic
  • Leaks personal information
  • Responsible for spreading cheats
  • Hates good players"

 

 

Which one there is an insult?

 

View PostLol_N00b, on 06 March 2015 - 07:09 PM, said:

Which of those players should WG listen?

The player base is so divided that whatever part of the players WG would want to listen would just make the changes as unappealing to the other part. 

 

True. 



tomatoRNGmaster #28 Posted 06 March 2015 - 07:13 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 38769 battles
  • 12,522
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View PostCommander_Chris, on 06 March 2015 - 05:13 PM, said:

"Armored Warfare developers have a vision, that doesn’t consist entirely of selling you more and more stuff – and they listen to the players. An example: it took me two years to convince Wargaming to put Czechoslovak tanks into the game. It took me three minutes to do that with Obsidian."

 

Obsidian is doing what every developer does when they're working on a new game and need to attract players. WG is doing what every developer does when they already have a game with an established playerbase. When will people realise this? Probably never because pattern recognition and critical, logical thought are hard.

I want AW to do well because WG could use a kick in the butt, but the way some people seem to think of Obsidian as some kind of messiah that will save us all and will never make any unpopular decisions is laughable.


Edited by Vonnis, 06 March 2015 - 07:15 PM.


BelizariusCZ #29 Posted 06 March 2015 - 07:14 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 135 battles
  • 546
  • Member since:
    09-08-2014
Please donate to SilentStalker if you want him to come back :P

Dr_LoVe69_makesWoTgreat #30 Posted 06 March 2015 - 07:18 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Clan Commander
  • 55809 battles
  • 3,301
  • Member since:
    12-24-2010

View PostVonnis, on 06 March 2015 - 07:13 PM, said:

Obsidian is doing what every developer does when they're working on a new game and need to attract players. 

 

WG did the same in beta.

 

View PostVonnis, on 06 March 2015 - 07:13 PM, said:

 When will people realise this? 

 

Once that other game comes out.



JPKERR #31 Posted 06 March 2015 - 07:19 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 19703 battles
  • 1,307
  • [CELL] CELL
  • Member since:
    08-17-2010

 

 "Armored Warfare developers have a vision, that doesn’t consist entirely of selling you more and more stuff – and they listen to the players. An example: it took me two years to convince Wargaming to put Czechoslovak tanks into the game. It took me three minutes to do that with Obsidian."

 

More like AW is better at serving lies :teethhappy:

Go ahead, try and find Czech tank fitting AW timeframe that IS NOT T-55, T-72 etc with Czech emblem and some more crap on it. Stalker's motto should be "Copytanks are bad unless they are Czech!"

You guys take SS as a god of some sort which is funny. Sure he was fairly reliable source of translations but majority of other content was rubbish (except stricte historical articles). How to convince a fanatical Czechtank lover to sign the contract? You should know the answer.

 

 

 Thank you Silentstalker for you contribution, have a great time working for Obsidian.

 

He wont work for Obsidian. He will work for whatever the Russian company name is. Obsidian is just hired to create the game as told to. What can be said about their Russian employers? They're pushing out cheap knock off pay2win games for both mobile and PC. Quantity over quality in their case. Have you ever heard about one of their games like their MMORPG? No? Maybe because they are all crap.:D

 


Edited by JPKERR, 06 March 2015 - 07:20 PM.


Slyspy #32 Posted 06 March 2015 - 08:05 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 14711 battles
  • 17,479
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View PostVonnis, on 06 March 2015 - 07:13 PM, said:

 

Obsidian is doing what every developer does when they're working on a new game and need to attract players. WG is doing what every developer does when they already have a game with an established playerbase. When will people realise this? Probably never because pattern recognition and critical, logical thought are hard.

I want AW to do well because WG could use a kick in the butt, but the way some people seem to think of Obsidian as some kind of messiah that will save us all and will never make any unpopular decisions is laughable.

 

Absolutely. Obsidian's plan seems to be "lets make the same game but with modern tanks and then promise to change all the bits which people grumble about". This cynical observer sees an equally cynical cash grab which will either result in a superior game or, more likely, a game with a different set of issues.

Mr_Thursday #33 Posted 06 March 2015 - 08:10 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22092 battles
  • 650
  • Member since:
    08-25-2011
When the paymasters who put up the developmentcash come calling, AW will be monetised to hell in a hand cart.

Grimdorf #34 Posted 06 March 2015 - 08:11 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11658 battles
  • 1,919
  • Member since:
    11-26-2012

View PostBelizariusCZ, on 06 March 2015 - 06:14 PM, said:

Please donate to SilentStalker if you want him to come back :P

 

Just :trollface:

Captain_Karpov #35 Posted 06 March 2015 - 08:41 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32015 battles
  • 452
  • [-VIC-] -VIC-
  • Member since:
    01-19-2012

View PostHomer_J, on 06 March 2015 - 05:01 PM, said:

 

Really?

 

If they had done that we would have tank horns and tanks driving underwater and other stupid ideas.

 

Luckily they know that players don't really know what makes a good game.

 

Tanks can be equipped or modded to drive under water in RL. 

 

Where as giving a tank crew some "tea and pudding" or some "coca cola" will of course make them better crewmen! (can we have some carrots for extended viewrange?)



Jigabachi #36 Posted 06 March 2015 - 09:02 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 21,021
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostLol_N00b, on 06 March 2015 - 07:09 PM, said:

Which of those players should WG listen?

It's quite simple: To the relevant players. That can be either the playerbase as a whole, certain groups of people or even single players. It all depends on the quality of the feedback.

And that can be either a forum swamped with artythreads, or a single experienced player offering elaborate feedback.

 


Edited by Jigabachi, 06 March 2015 - 09:45 PM.


Slyspy #37 Posted 06 March 2015 - 09:22 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 14711 battles
  • 17,479
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View PostCaptain_Karpov, on 06 March 2015 - 08:41 PM, said:

 

Tanks can be equipped or modded to drive under water in RL. 

 

Where as giving a tank crew some "tea and pudding" or some "coca cola" will of course make them better crewmen! (can we have some carrots for extended viewrange?)

 

Tank crews work better when fed!

 

View PostJigabachi, on 06 March 2015 - 09:02 PM, said:

It's quite simply: To the relevant players. That can be either the playerbase as a whole, certain groups of people or even single players. It all depends on the quality of the feedback.

And that can be either a forum swamped with artythreads, or a single experienced player offering elaborate feedback.

 

 

Simple my backside! Besides which when people ask someone to  "listen to feedback" they mean "act on feedback", two very different things.



kaneAAA #38 Posted 06 March 2015 - 09:31 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 43164 battles
  • 1,880
  • [SKRAP] SKRAP
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012

View PostGrimdorf, on 06 March 2015 - 05:42 PM, said:

 

Give it a rest will you.

Saying or implying crap.

Then denying it.

You are getting boring

 

Some people think that whatever WG does is great......they are always great...no matter what..... *monotonous zombie voice*

charns #39 Posted 06 March 2015 - 09:32 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 16607 battles
  • 873
  • Member since:
    07-12-2012
I find it hard to believe Obsidian will really put Czechoslovak tanks. http://www.globalfir...ies-listing.asp . There are more relevant warfare countries than Cz even though I totally respect fellow Eu citizens. Most relevant tank producers are in Top warfare countries. Others are mostly users, customers.

Dr_LoVe69_makesWoTgreat #40 Posted 06 March 2015 - 09:42 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Clan Commander
  • 55809 battles
  • 3,301
  • Member since:
    12-24-2010

View Postcharns, on 06 March 2015 - 09:32 PM, said:

 

In that list Singapore pwns CZ, Bulgaria, Mexico and Spain.

Sorry but NO.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users