Jump to content


Clan performance compared to skill/stats


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

Athanati_Este #1 Posted 03 May 2015 - 07:49 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 40456 battles
  • 717
  • [K4E] K4E
  • Member since:
    04-13-2012

Which clan/s do you think are overachieving/underachieving the most compared to their actual stats?

 

CW/SH/Past campaigns included.

 

For underachievers I'd go for BABA, they seem to have solid amount of players with good stats but they can't seem to be up there with other top clans similar to their stats.

Not sure about over overachievers, maybe O-S-C.



Man_in_TD #2 Posted 03 May 2015 - 08:10 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19129 battles
  • 268
  • [EFE-X] EFE-X
  • Member since:
    06-05-2012

Stats don't matter quite as much in coordinated teamplay.You can be good in randoms and not so good in CW player-wise and even vice-versa.

Also,good FC's are definitly needed.with bad FC's you can have quite competent players and struggle to enter Africa.



_SgtBomber_ #3 Posted 03 May 2015 - 08:10 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Clan Commander
  • 18664 battles
  • 1,334
  • [CRYPT] CRYPT
  • Member since:
    10-11-2012

Not sure about the purpose of this topic Dark'.

 

But ye, easy to name one that will knock socks off any1 out in the teamplay, RED_S. Regarding the fact they rolling with 2.1k avg, clan that I used to not like at all but after several battles with em I have to say I am a big fan of them. Other good clans in teamplay are definately CALM_, TSOP, BIA and JCKAL.

 

Under achievers, well why go and naming and shaming here.


Edited by 5uperBomBer, 03 May 2015 - 08:11 PM.


Blue_Badger #4 Posted 03 May 2015 - 08:13 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 14504 battles
  • 2,440
  • [3VS27] 3VS27
  • Member since:
    09-25-2012
ANGER have always done really well. 

Jeffers0nAirplane #5 Posted 03 May 2015 - 08:32 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 68474 battles
  • 1,080
  • [JUN] JUN
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
baba noob clan

Athanati_Este #6 Posted 03 May 2015 - 08:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 40456 battles
  • 717
  • [K4E] K4E
  • Member since:
    04-13-2012

View Post5uperBomBer, on 03 May 2015 - 07:10 PM, said:

Not sure about the purpose of this topic Dark'.

 

But ye, easy to name one that will knock socks off any1 out in the teamplay, RED_S. Regarding the fact they rolling with 2.1k avg, clan that I used to not like at all but after several battles with em I have to say I am a big fan of them. Other good clans in teamplay are definately CALM_, TSOP, BIA and JCKAL.

 

Under achievers, well why go and naming and shaming here.

 

Just out of curiousty.

 

And its not really naming and shaming, it could go under "guys you can do way better than you are doing". :)

 

Edit: And yeah, RED_S started off as a spin-off from O-S-C. ^_^


Edited by darkomsq, 03 May 2015 - 08:44 PM.


Athanati_Este #7 Posted 03 May 2015 - 08:42 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 40456 battles
  • 717
  • [K4E] K4E
  • Member since:
    04-13-2012

View PostMan_in_TD, on 03 May 2015 - 07:10 PM, said:

Stats don't matter quite as much in coordinated teamplay.You can be good in randoms and not so good in CW player-wise and even vice-versa.

Also,good FC's are definitly needed.with bad FC's you can have quite competent players and struggle to enter Africa.

 

I am aware of that, good FC with not so good stats wise team makes up for overachievers. :)


Edit: And yeah, stats for random games usually represent free will positioning, choice of targets, whereas the thing that transfers from pub stats are mechanical skills, which do influence performance in CW's quite a lot. So stats from pub games are quite related to CW performance, not all the way but big part is.


Edited by darkomsq, 03 May 2015 - 08:48 PM.


KorelG #8 Posted 03 May 2015 - 09:27 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34768 battles
  • 1,633
  • Member since:
    03-26-2012
Well for overachiever my vote is for ARCAN cuz they r on the europe since they r built with avg  1.7k wn8. And for underachieving TESLA is not the same old TESLA.

Athanati_Este #9 Posted 03 May 2015 - 09:58 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 40456 battles
  • 717
  • [K4E] K4E
  • Member since:
    04-13-2012
Well Tesla has no alliance or NAP's, they do pretty good at SH fights and they did also good last campaign. Maybe underachieving on global map, but that is partly due no NAP policy.

_RollingThunder_ #10 Posted 03 May 2015 - 11:28 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 21048 battles
  • 2,176
  • Member since:
    01-12-2014
underachiever: excess. they are really good at mountain pass




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users