Jump to content


Public Test of Changes in the Penetration Mechanics


  • Please log in to reply
503 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:03 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 26,321
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Public test server is now open.

Full news text


DanMan96 #2 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:13 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 278 battles
  • 202
  • Member since:
    05-10-2012

*
POPULAR

Necessity to increase the role of armor? Hilarious!

Necessity to increase your profit!

First you nerf the accuracy, so that people miss more of their goldshells,

now you nerf the penetration, so that people buy more goldshells!

More goldshells = more people lose credits = more people buy premium account or premium tanks  = higher profit for WG

GG.

 


Edited by DanMan96, 18 June 2015 - 07:52 PM.


Monster95alpha19 #3 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:14 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 35389 battles
  • 4,000
  • [TKEA] TKEA
  • Member since:
    10-28-2011

*
POPULAR

So, Gold shots are gonna be spammed even more..great..

Gloris #4 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:16 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 19748 battles
  • 1,691
  • Member since:
    08-14-2011

*
POPULAR

Thanks

 

I always wanted to lose 30mm pen on my Hightier Meds.

Now every Tomato in an Is-7 is completely immune to me unless is fire HEAT.

 

Thanks WG

 

T10 is now Fire prem of die.

 

(Yes i know, It's just the testserver they will change it blahblahblah. Remember people said the same thing about for example the WT E-100)

 

 

You know what will "fix" T10 Wargaming?

Nerf Prem rounds, DO NOT TAKE 30MM PEN OF TANKS NORMAL ROUNDS.

 

If this change comes live and every Med i have will be "Heat or die" i will never again spend a single cent on this game or any other of your products WG.


Edited by Gloris, 18 June 2015 - 05:21 PM.


LoveAmiga #5 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:18 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 31051 battles
  • 239
  • Member since:
    05-15-2011

*
POPULAR

This is the most obvious money greed from a company I've seen in a long time. We are not stupid WG, so don't treat us like we are.

Edited by LoveAmiga, 20 June 2015 - 02:20 PM.


JohnTheNoob #6 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:19 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 16553 battles
  • 38
  • Member since:
    04-02-2013
so now it will be necessary to fire gold rounds to be competitive. what a great idea i hope it will make armor more important since instead of shells with pen 260 now we will be shooting shells with pen 300

PoIestar #7 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:19 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 31894 battles
  • 4,115
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013

Only nerfing gold rounds = balance

Nerfing all = still gold firing like [edited], same things but now ruined all tanks.



CoolDannyO #8 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:20 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 27908 battles
  • 39
  • Member since:
    02-08-2014

WG keep wrecking is own game. They need more money to keep building their huge new tower, so they need players to buy more of their very cheap bundles of €100 with gold and credits.

 

GOOD thing Armored Warfare is here. Wanna bet how many players will start moving away to this new better game? :) 50%? 60%?

 

I would like to see community contributors to have a say on the latest WOT updates. If you don't stand up for your viewers, soon you won't have many considering that they will mostly leave WOT :)

 

 


Edited by CoolDannyO, 19 June 2015 - 12:30 AM.


dodgerman20001 #9 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:20 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Clan Commander
  • 20729 battles
  • 368
  • [KICKS] KICKS
  • Member since:
    03-18-2011

Are you just stupid at WOT HQ or trying to kill the game off???

Shed loads of players have left WOT thanks to the STUPID idea of gold shell

where any UNSKILL noob can point and kill. When this game first came out

it was based on the players skill to do damage, now all you see is one hit

wonders using gold in every game just to higher they're stats.

If your going to NERF the crap out of the tanks YET AGAIN, then remove

the gold shells before you have no game left!!!!!!!



xidex #10 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:21 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 31890 battles
  • 80
  • Member since:
    02-18-2012

Entire "gold ammo" system is broken. Gold ammo should be reworked to the normal ammo with differences berween HEAT and kinetic penetrators and people would have to think what to load. It's that simple.

This change will only promote more gold spam gameplay....its so obvious, but WG always went for "more money for (vodka) us" concept instead of "more skill to the game".

 



PoIestar #11 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:22 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 31894 battles
  • 4,115
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013

Besides, 232 mm for Object 140? That's way more than F.I. Leopard 1 that went from 268 (4 more) to 243 (11 more).

 

This is stupid. Hope you realise ASAP. And the gold nerfs are too minimum, nerf it to like max 300 mm for everything and it's good. If you can't pen crap with 265 mm pen you shouldn't be driving tier 10 vehicles.



insanEEE_ #12 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:23 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 33022 battles
  • 567
  • [TRTL5] TRTL5
  • Member since:
    02-17-2012

*
POPULAR

Making mediums so they suppose to flank on those [edited] maps of yours :teethhappy:

Edited by Neilloss46, 24 June 2015 - 06:17 PM.
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content. Neilloss46


Candarian #13 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:23 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35321 battles
  • 639
  • [PAFLO] PAFLO
  • Member since:
    10-06-2011
  • Penetration of the M318A1 shell for the 90 mm Gun Type 61 reduced from 218.7 to 218 mm.

realy?

 

by the way 

 

why did the gold ammo need the buff in the first place?


Edited by Candarian, 18 June 2015 - 05:31 PM.


Eminent_Pigeon #14 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:24 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 4734 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    07-03-2013

Well done WG profit increase you will see then :)

 



Nikos021 #15 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:26 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 50063 battles
  • 70
  • [GBOA] GBOA
  • Member since:
    12-31-2013
[edited]
 
 
 
 

Edited by Neilloss46, 24 June 2015 - 06:19 PM.
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content. Neilloss46


Xaramas #16 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:27 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16739 battles
  • 109
  • Member since:
    11-29-2011

So you want to increase the importance of armor by forcing everybody to shoot premium ammo on tier X to stay competitive. Stronk logic.

 

It's amazing how you keep refusing to balance premium ammo by nerfing the dmg.



Eminent_Pigeon #17 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:29 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 4734 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    07-03-2013
Why touch the pen of the 105mm gun in British line on the centurion7/1 it was the gem of the tank and the line. Makes me very sad:(  

Panzerschreck1985 #18 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:30 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 11153 battles
  • 221
  • Member since:
    06-27-2011
That can only be the first step towards reducing the damage of gold ammo. If not - the next try from wg to make players buy more credit packages for gold ammo spam.

TurkishBomber187 #19 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:30 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 10989 battles
  • 77
  • Member since:
    01-14-2015
dude i cant wait till armored warfare releases their game out , ill be deleting this game in a blink of an eye.WG go nerf ur a$$, its grown from eating all the fatning dollar bills of ours.

Gloris #20 Posted 18 June 2015 - 05:31 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 19748 battles
  • 1,691
  • Member since:
    08-14-2011

So now guys, what do you think is the case here.

 

A.) WG wants to force people to shoot prem at T10 so they spend more Money on Prem ammo/accounts/tanks

B.) WG are complete incompetent muppets not playing their own game who really think this will make it somehow better

C.) This is a late april fools joke.

 

A B or C.

 

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users