Jump to content


4.06 Ban wave collective topic-RESOLVED TY WG-looks like not for all


  • Please log in to reply
1742 replies to this topic

luciffer #1 Posted 26 June 2015 - 10:50 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 49743 battles
  • 1,016
  • [DBWS] DBWS
  • Member since:
    12-27-2011

*
POPULAR

After all they played fair admitted their mistake and compensated players.
I just want to say thank you for all people that supporter us and trolls for keeping topic at the top.
Now just one thing get me back to negative rep count :trollface:  
Spoiler

4.06. Using bots, clickers, macros, keyboard and mouse recorders, or any other similar methods to accumulate credits and experience without the participation or with passive participation of the player within the battle.

Me bot? Rly?


Edited by luciffer, 30 June 2015 - 10:46 PM.


OMGDean #2 Posted 26 June 2015 - 10:57 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 27826 battles
  • 383
  • [R-U] R-U
  • Member since:
    03-20-2015

View Postluciffer, on 26 June 2015 - 10:50 AM, said:

Spoiler

4.06. Using bots, clickers, macros, keyboard and mouse recorders, or any other similar methods to accumulate credits and experience without the participation or with passive participation of the player within the battle.

Me bot? Rly?

 

A bot with 62% recent win rate, whats the secret?

luciffer #3 Posted 26 June 2015 - 10:59 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 49743 battles
  • 1,016
  • [DBWS] DBWS
  • Member since:
    12-27-2011

View PostQ2daFace, on 26 June 2015 - 10:57 AM, said:

 

A bot with 62% recent win rate, whats the secret?

 

I am the new improved form of AI capable of playing games at level better then usual humans.

Writing forum topics also :trollface:



Mr_Thursday #4 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:04 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22092 battles
  • 650
  • Member since:
    08-25-2011
So will WG also ban all the cretins who camp out the battle and die with zero damage done? Given that 'passive participation' is against the rules?

Ulicum #5 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:10 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39597 battles
  • 1,961
  • Member since:
    07-09-2011

View Postluciffer, on 26 June 2015 - 09:59 AM, said:

 

I am the new improved form of AI capable of playing games at level better then usual humans.

Writing forum topics also :trollface:

 

Proof that youre indeed a bot, or alien is in noobmeter charts: http://www.noobmeter...iffer/502011308

Just humanly not possibull bro!

teekoo_kookoo #6 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:18 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 163 battles
  • 20
  • Member since:
    08-15-2014
But rest assured you was received justice "Please note that our decision is based on a very thorough investigation and cannot be overturned."

Sergeant_Antaro_Chronus #7 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:20 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14425 battles
  • 634
  • [EL-G] EL-G
  • Member since:
    06-24-2013
Are you the Skynet AI ?!:trollface:

OMGDean #8 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:21 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 27826 battles
  • 383
  • [R-U] R-U
  • Member since:
    03-20-2015

View Postluciffer, on 26 June 2015 - 10:59 AM, said:

 

I am the new improved form of AI capable of playing games at level better then usual humans.

Writing forum topics also :trollface:

 

Less stet padding and kemping bush might make tomatos not report you... I'm a bad player so I can't say too much. :)

TheDrownedApe #9 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:21 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 47537 battles
  • 6,050
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013
man i can't wait to see the answer to your ticket (i assume you've submitted one?)

Kampfpazifist #10 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:22 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21604 battles
  • 237
  • [PZR4] PZR4
  • Member since:
    01-18-2015

It is nice to see that they actually do seem to care about the bot issues.

Makes me getting a little warmer with WG EU. 


Edited by Kampfpazifist, 26 June 2015 - 11:23 AM.


fREDDY2 #11 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:22 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18484 battles
  • 511
  • Member since:
    07-23-2011
Thorough investigation....................................................................:trollface::trollface:

Steiner011 #12 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:25 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 41435 battles
  • 1,489
  • [SCRUB] SCRUB
  • Member since:
    10-09-2012

I like the part where automated e-mail says he`s sorry :trollface:

 



Arty_Loves_You #13 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:26 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 33869 battles
  • 3,565
  • Member since:
    05-10-2013

I WANT YOUR BOT PROGRAMME !!!!!!!

 

Honestly, WG are such bunch of shortcut, less cash out option, dickheads....



Signal11th #14 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:26 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 41559 battles
  • 6,308
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    07-14-2011
lol who was it investigated by Stevie Wonder?

Catastrophe #15 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:28 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10279 battles
  • 335
  • Member since:
    05-24-2011

The "very thorough investigation" part is pretty disturbing

 

it takes merely a few seconds to establish player is above average and improving (with a 4+ year old, 30k+ account no less)

Surely this is a mistake?



Kampfpazifist #16 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:30 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21604 battles
  • 237
  • [PZR4] PZR4
  • Member since:
    01-18-2015

I do not judge if he is guilty or not. I honestly do not know.

But you guys act as if his WR was actually proof of his being clean of the charge,

when, seen from a strictly rational point of view, this is no proof at all.



Ceeb #17 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:31 AM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 31801 battles
  • 5,747
  • [BULL] BULL
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011
There's two fish in a tank, and one says "How do you drive this thing?"

luciffer #18 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:34 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 49743 battles
  • 1,016
  • [DBWS] DBWS
  • Member since:
    12-27-2011

View PostQ2daFace, on 26 June 2015 - 11:21 AM, said:

 

Less stet padding and kemping bush might make tomatos not report you... I'm a bad player so I can't say too much. :)

My survival rate of 26.56% tells you how much i kemp bush i play very aggressive... 

 

View Postbrownape, on 26 June 2015 - 11:21 AM, said:

man i can't wait to see the answer to your ticket (i assume you've submitted one?)

Yea ticket submitted now is waiting game. 



OMGDean #19 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:34 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 27826 battles
  • 383
  • [R-U] R-U
  • Member since:
    03-20-2015

View PostKampfpazifist, on 26 June 2015 - 11:30 AM, said:

I do not judge if he is guilty or not. I honestly do not know.

But you guys act as if his WR was actually proof of his being clean of the charge,

when, seen from a strictly rational point of view, this is no proof at all.

 

The proof is certainly not concrete but a bot program sophisticated enough to be among the better players on the server? Does such wonders exist?

 

Surely it's a case of common sense prevailing... Trouble with sense is it's anything but common.


Edited by Q2daFace, 26 June 2015 - 11:36 AM.


Obsessive_Compulsive #20 Posted 26 June 2015 - 11:34 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 28743 battles
  • 8,481
  • Member since:
    09-09-2014

View Postluciffer, on 26 June 2015 - 10:50 AM, said:

Spoiler

4.06. Using bots, clickers, macros, keyboard and mouse recorders, or any other similar methods to accumulate credits and experience without the participation or with passive participation of the player within the battle.

Me bot? Rly?

 

auto fire extinguisher mod?




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users