Jump to content


New Spähpanzer SP 1.C. Thoughts?


  • Please log in to reply
102 replies to this topic

Hyina #101 Posted 23 December 2016 - 08:20 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 53935 battles
  • 190
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013
Not sure what to make of the negativity surrounding this tank. It's a better version of 13 90 at t7 because the times when you actually unload the entire magazine is rare, the 240 alpha is much more substantial than the pop gun on the bulldog. The slow velocity of the shell isn't a problem if you're giving correct lead and skilled in doing so.
 
If I was to complain about it I'd say the sluggish power/weight ratio, but apart from that this has been easily one of my if not the most comfortable tank to play in, but I shall retire it from service now :)
 

Edited by Hyina, 23 December 2016 - 08:21 AM.


SlayerOfScrubs #102 Posted 24 December 2016 - 07:37 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 26836 battles
  • 311
  • [REBLS] REBLS
  • Member since:
    02-25-2013
A fun little tank is all I can say. Had some trouble with it at first due to the sluggishness in light tank terms. But if you manage to empty that autoloader you can actually grab plenty of damage in a short time. Nice little tank.

73north #103 Posted 31 December 2016 - 12:27 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39784 battles
  • 733
  • Member since:
    10-19-2012

I have finally finished the grind on this little tank destroyer - and unlocked both tanks that come next in technical tree -

and my thoughts are that it its a superb little scout and can be an emergency tank destroyer for re-setting cap's - and saving your game

I only carried 3 HEAT shells ( the penetration is superb with them ) - for emergency purposes

I loved every game in it , and its gun is far , far better than the AMX 13 90 at range ( I'm a sniper at heart )

the auto-loader reloads fast - and you don't wait as long as the 13 90 reload

I seemed to be better in the SP1c ( 55% win rate ) than the AMX 13 90 ( 48% win rate ) -

though the failing in the 13 90 was more down to my failings than the machine I suppose -

but others have found the 13 90 less than stellar






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users