Jump to content


Official E-100 impressions


  • Please log in to reply
3268 replies to this topic

Poll: Official E-100 impressions (3220 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

E-100 poll

  1. Excellent (447 votes [13.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.88%

  2. Good (605 votes [18.79%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.79%

  3. Above average (273 votes [8.48%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.48%

  4. Average (467 votes [14.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.50%

  5. Below average (733 votes [22.76%])

    Percentage of vote: 22.76%

  6. Poor (695 votes [21.58%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.58%

Vote Hide poll

Laughter #1 Posted 11 August 2011 - 05:48 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 16826 battles
  • 968
  • [PTS] PTS
  • Member since:
    02-15-2011

*
POPULAR

What do you think of the E-100?

MyPrinciple #2 Posted 11 August 2011 - 06:38 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 8685 battles
  • 2
  • [ATLAS] ATLAS
  • Member since:
    02-25-2011

*
POPULAR

Im kinda disappointed with the E-100. It simply doesnt feel like a Tier 10 tank because..

* - can be penetrated from all sides
* - is really huge
* - the mixture of bad gun accuracy + low penetration => how to hit the weakspots?

I rather play E 75

Since WG is balancing the Tanks with our win/loss rate, whats your rate?

Ive got 31 battles, 43% win rate... its so damn hard to get good results with this tank. The IS7s are so hard to kill.. cause the E100 is slow, and hitting the front weaksspots is kina difficult *g*

Dr_Nooooo #3 Posted 11 August 2011 - 06:49 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 13211 battles
  • 1,415
  • Member since:
    07-19-2010
Give us the Mausturm you promised us - but took away again - and it might be fine.

Paaranoja #4 Posted 11 August 2011 - 06:50 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 31993 battles
  • 2,215
  • [DAVAI] DAVAI
  • Member since:
    11-03-2010

View PostDr_Nooooo, on 11 August 2011 - 06:49 PM, said:

Give us the Mausturm you promised us - but took away again - and it might be fine.


agreed, mausturm is a must

marko4231 #5 Posted 11 August 2011 - 06:58 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 16357 battles
  • 560
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

*
POPULAR

Adler turm is a must, Henschel turm is a must, Maus turm is a- last straw of hope- compromise, but not to improve E100, but to ever feel that we have a word in this game.
At the end we are the customers, the players, you should do all you can to make us happy, right?? :blink:

Laughter #6 Posted 11 August 2011 - 07:02 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 16826 battles
  • 968
  • [PTS] PTS
  • Member since:
    02-15-2011

View PostMyPrinciple, on 11 August 2011 - 06:38 PM, said:

Im kinda disappointed with the E-100. It simply doesnt feel like a Tier 10 tank because..

* - can be penetrated from all sides
* - is really huge
* - the mixture of bad gun accuracy + low penetration => how to hit the weakspots?

I rather play E 75

Since WG is balancing the Tanks with our win/loss rate, whats your rate?

Ive got 31 battles, 43% win rate... its so damn hard to get good results with this tank. The IS7s are so hard to kill.. cause the E100 is slow, and hitting the front weaksspots is kina difficult *g*

WG doesn't balance with win rate it takes every stat into account especially exp per battle and damage per battle. Mine are: 26 battles, 21 wins, 3 loss and 2 draws ~3k damage per battle.

MyPrinciple #7 Posted 11 August 2011 - 07:07 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 8685 battles
  • 2
  • [ATLAS] ATLAS
  • Member since:
    02-25-2011
Ahhhh thx Laughter, didnt know that.

Seems like im doing it WROOONG :)

Orlund #8 Posted 11 August 2011 - 07:09 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 8573 battles
  • 891
  • Member since:
    09-30-2010
I only had like 10 matches in testing but since you still haven't buffed the AP penetration i doubt it will be worth it over maus.

Dr_Nooooo #9 Posted 11 August 2011 - 07:10 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 13211 battles
  • 1,415
  • Member since:
    07-19-2010

View PostLaughter, on 11 August 2011 - 07:02 PM, said:

WG doesn't balance with win rate it takes every stat into account especially exp per battle and damage per battle. Mine are: 26 battles, 21 wins, 3 loss and 2 draws ~3k damage per battle.

And all those stats are not depended on the Tank but on the Players. And that is why noob droven tanks like IS-4 and T-54 are still too good althought the playerstats indicate they are subpar to the germans.

FilipMinee #10 Posted 11 August 2011 - 07:21 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 17616 battles
  • 1,443
  • [BE_NL] BE_NL
  • Member since:
    07-15-2010
Big majority of the tanks played atm are Germans its safe to assume  at this point that noob % is equally distributed at this point between E50 T54 IS4 E75 drivers.

Motions #11 Posted 11 August 2011 - 07:52 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6063 battles
  • 824
  • Member since:
    04-20-2011
If you take an IS-7 for example. It has the best speed of all tier 10 tanks, but isn't that good at 'just sit still and shoot other tier 10's'. Almost every IS-7 player plays the tank like a heavy, when it's more of a hybrid medium-heavy. They don't take advantage of it's speed. That's why it has worse stats than the Maus/T30, but it's a lot better tank.

FrankK2 #12 Posted 11 August 2011 - 07:54 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Veteran
  • 9893 battles
  • 332
  • [-LUP-] -LUP-
  • Member since:
    07-20-2010

*
POPULAR

Laughter is using premium ammo, hello! lol

Metalman #13 Posted 11 August 2011 - 08:59 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 20627 battles
  • 104
  • [SNAKE] SNAKE
  • Member since:
    07-09-2010
Front lower plate. It's really a disaster. Big, easy to hit and penetrate. No matter how you angle your tank. Everybody hits this part and 90% of hits guarantee less/more damage. Success hit from Tier7/Tier8 = 99% of times engine/driver dead and/or fire. In my opinion lower plate is most important to fix ASAP :)

150mm gun. Damage maybe ok but penetration make a lots of troubles... It can be still better.

E-100 = is more 9.5 then tier 10.

Charcharo #14 Posted 11 August 2011 - 09:38 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 30132 battles
  • 1,414
  • [INC] INC
  • Member since:
    09-16-2010
Tweaks I think would be nice for all T10 tanks:

E-100:
-Slight buffs to lower hull armor (very slight)
-240 penetration form 15cm gun
-Nerf damage of 12.8 to 480 but buff RoF to match the same DPM and maybe give the 128mm some 252 mm of penetration.
-2450 HP
-Set gearbox at the back
Maus:
-Nerf damage of 12.8 to 480 but buff RoF to match the same DPM and maybe give the 128mm some 252 mm of penetration.
-Activate the 75mm gun
-After that set HP at 3000
T30:
-Keep it as it is until it goes TD
-2250 HP
IS-7:
-Set a lower aim time for its gun. 2.7 secs would be right + 2200 HP.


Bobbydancer #15 Posted 11 August 2011 - 09:55 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 42733 battles
  • 852
  • [GGG] GGG
  • Member since:
    04-05-2011
If this tank gets the maus turret i stop using it. Turret now is better, maybe not the best of the turrets earlier mention , but far better then maus.

Charcharo #16 Posted 11 August 2011 - 09:58 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 30132 battles
  • 1,414
  • [INC] INC
  • Member since:
    09-16-2010

View PostBobbydancer, on 11 August 2011 - 09:55 PM, said:

If this tank gets the maus turret i stop using it. Turret now is better, maybe not the best of the turrets earlier mention , but far better then maus.
How about both? 2 > 1...

klesk #17 Posted 11 August 2011 - 11:54 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 28883 battles
  • 1,747
  • Member since:
    09-09-2010

View PostDr_Nooooo, on 11 August 2011 - 07:10 PM, said:

And all those stats are not depended on the Tank but on the Players. And that is why noob droven tanks like IS-4 and T-54 are still too good althought the playerstats indicate they are subpar to the germans.

Any perticular reason as to why russian tanks have n00b drivers, and german dont?

Snortsch #18 Posted 11 August 2011 - 11:55 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17701 battles
  • 1,254
  • [PRO_X] PRO_X
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011

View PostLaughter, on 11 August 2011 - 07:02 PM, said:

WG doesn't balance with win rate it takes every stat into account especially exp per battle and damage per battle. Mine are: 26 battles, 21 wins, 3 loss and 2 draws ~3k damage per battle.

You're either a very lucky man when it comes to random matchmaking, or your using gold ammo in random battles while playing in
a platoon with other t10 tanks that also use gold ammo.


And after all, the win ratio doesn't mean anyhing! Its like saying, I won the battle alone, god I'm good^^

Nothing against you, half of the people post their win ration instead posting their average XP per battle.

Snortsch #19 Posted 11 August 2011 - 11:57 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17701 battles
  • 1,254
  • [PRO_X] PRO_X
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011

View PostBobbydancer, on 11 August 2011 - 09:55 PM, said:

If this tank gets the maus turret i stop using it. Turret now is better, maybe not the best of the turrets earlier mention , but far better then maus.

Its not about taking the krupp turret away at all, its just about giving it the maus turret as

an alternative like it was in the first version of patch 6.6.

You can keep your precious krupp turret ;)

dagann #20 Posted 12 August 2011 - 12:05 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 8369 battles
  • 2,078
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011
I do not own a E-100 but i can pierce them like butter in the lower plate without any bounce, with the 128 of my E-75 (no ammo gold).
Whereas i can bounce on is4, is7,vk45...
Someting is wrong wth the E-100. <_<

I m a bit apprehensive when i get it.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users