Jump to content


Level 6 SH gets steam-rolled by level 10 SH guys

stronghold op tanks unfair

  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

duo_lat #1 Posted 10 July 2015 - 11:31 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 17231 battles
  • 3
  • [EAB2] EAB2
  • Member since:
    02-03-2013
In the past few weeks my clan was attacked by multiple top clans who have their buildings at tier 10 level. Basically, we had no chance to stand against them. I wonder if WG plans to introduce any limitations on attacking clans with lower building levels? I think making it like in random battles would be fine.

sandfacer #2 Posted 10 July 2015 - 08:13 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 32099 battles
  • 174
  • [_GNR_] _GNR_
  • Member since:
    10-16-2011

we getting attacked by red_s cowards cant attack good clans pick on the weak ones so a clan with a tier 10 stronghold can attack a tier 5 one wtf they are getting called pu***S the whole game

 


Edited by sandfacer, 10 July 2015 - 08:20 PM.


Vahakn #3 Posted 28 July 2015 - 12:49 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Clan Commander
  • 7343 battles
  • 1,078
  • [DIIN] DIIN
  • Member since:
    12-30-2012
Another reason why many clans have decided not to go beyond level 5. i understand your frustration.

Moondiver #4 Posted 26 August 2015 - 09:50 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 18329 battles
  • 12
  • [35RI] 35RI
  • Member since:
    07-10-2011

We stopped just before 5. We use resource to get bonuses. We would love to play higher but in it will cost too much for us casual players. We lost so many player the last few month because they found the game unfair for small clans.

 

 

Wargaming has to start some limitation to protect small clan. Same in battle: what's the point to have a team of players having 4000 (personal rate) against a team of 8000.

 

They should use XVM for the MM.


Edited by Moondiver, 26 August 2015 - 09:55 AM.


NakedPassenger #5 Posted 26 January 2016 - 08:09 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 32129 battles
  • 578
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-29-2013

It's not worthwhile to attack those low clans at all in my opinion.

Plus you have air and arty strikes to def and the attackers don't. Use those and you have more than a chance.



maroar #6 Posted 27 January 2016 - 01:25 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29488 battles
  • 2,462
  • [G__G] G__G
  • Member since:
    10-02-2012

View PostNakedPassenger, on 26 January 2016 - 08:09 PM, said:

It's not worthwhile to attack those low clans at all in my opinion.

Plus you have air and arty strikes to def and the attackers don't. Use those and you have more than a chance.

 

Would require those clans to have those buildings though.

 

 

Anyways, I think it would be nice if level 5 would give the SH attacks/defences against others that only have a T5 SH.

Then a T6 defending against max T8 (maybe T9) SH.

And T7 defending against max T10 SH.

 

This would give a nice build up for those people and I don't think it would really hurt this way.

It would get the people stcuk on T4 a chance to try out against same minded clans on the T5 SH and if they like it get a slight more challenging time on the higher tier SHs.



NakedPassenger #7 Posted 27 January 2016 - 04:26 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 32129 battles
  • 578
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-29-2013

That is a good solution in my opinion.

But on the other hand I really like that revenge-sh-attacks for flames/arty/lulz because of random battles or skirmish flames :o

 

(how often we get attacked bcause we flame too much in skirms...)



maroar #8 Posted 28 January 2016 - 04:06 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29488 battles
  • 2,462
  • [G__G] G__G
  • Member since:
    10-02-2012

View PostNakedPassenger, on 27 January 2016 - 04:26 PM, said:

That is a good solution in my opinion.

But on the other hand I really like that revenge-sh-attacks for flames/arty/lulz because of random battles or skirmish flames :o

 

(how often we get attacked bcause we flame too much in skirms...)

 

There could ofcourse be some tweaking in my idea.

But it is mainly to pull the T4 skirmish players up, in this way they can try the competiveness on a lower level and then choose if they like it.

I would opt for a version where the T6 SH also can not get attacked by Tier 10 SHs as I would like to see it as a step to almost full competitiveness.


 

As I said, this could be tweaked, but I think this will draw more clans into SHs (also higher strongholds) and to the fun of the SH attack and defense.



DrStronklove #9 Posted 07 May 2016 - 05:27 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 33907 battles
  • 134
  • Member since:
    10-05-2013
Better to base it on clans Elo-rating instead, otherwise you are still just limiting weaker clans from having a high tier stronghold.

jjgjosh123 #10 Posted 19 May 2016 - 01:12 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7665 battles
  • 484
  • [TAC] TAC
  • Member since:
    02-25-2012

View PostMoondiver, on 26 August 2015 - 08:50 AM, said:

 

They should use XVM for the MM.

 

 

Completely agreed , XVM should definitely be used for the MM of strongholds , maybe even for normal MM in randoms as well.

 

:facepalm: /s



Venitus #11 Posted 25 May 2016 - 12:34 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 38877 battles
  • 1,295
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    01-05-2011

 







Also tagged with stronghold, op, tanks, unfair

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users