Jump to content


List of Top250 EU-Clans by WN8&Co

Cor Leontis Top Clans List WN8 wot-life.com

  • Please log in to reply
69 replies to this topic

HuntTiger #1 Posted 13 July 2015 - 06:26 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 27112 battles
  • 516
  • [LEOHQ] LEOHQ
  • Member since:
    04-06-2012

*
POPULAR

Hey there clan tankers,

 

long time ago there was a clanlist at noobmeter, where you could see the Top50 Clans. Nowadays you cant trust in noobmeter.

Then some guys started to published monthly lists by looking up some clans and compare their values. The problem was, that often they didnt checked out all important clans or just filled in the wrong numbers. So these lists were incorrect and not instantly updated.

 

Now I try to start a better solution. I pick the Top250 Clans of WGs Clanrating and take them into one list. Then I import the datas of the clanmembers of these clans from wot-life.com. (I will not explaine every step between now, because I dont want to bore you.) Finally I add up all the datas to clanvalues and publish this list.

 

You can watch it right here:

https://docs.google....l?gid=570771105

(Trust me, the link is a safe Google Sheets Published Link.)

Preview:

Spoiler

 

If you are interested in more detailed informations just open the Spoiler down below. If you want to ask something, primarily open the spoiler and try to find the answere inside.

If you are not interested in details and you have no more questions: Have fun with the list.

 

Spoiler

 

 

Finally I hope for success of this list and for help and support from your side.

Im sorry, if my english was a bit "creative" at some points, i hope you understood everything. If not, dont be afraid to ask.

And last but not least a big THANK YOU to wot-life.com (click to visit wot-life.com)! Without this website it would not have been so easy to create the list.


Edited by HuntTiger, 05 November 2015 - 08:06 PM.


HuntTiger #2 Posted 13 July 2015 - 06:28 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 27112 battles
  • 516
  • [LEOHQ] LEOHQ
  • Member since:
    04-06-2012

I will be ready to support today and tomorrow, but then I will take a trip to Rome for a week. So dont be angry if I cant answere then.



Time_To_BurN #3 Posted 13 July 2015 - 08:33 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 29189 battles
  • 185
  • Member since:
    06-01-2013

Thank you for your list.

Clan works, http://eu.wargaming....lans/500065431/ working as intended are in 3th place with 38 members. No provinces. But above omni for example?

:o 



Toffer1337 #4 Posted 13 July 2015 - 08:45 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28374 battles
  • 934
  • Member since:
    11-29-2012

View PostDiv1nus, on 13 July 2015 - 07:33 AM, said:

Thank you for your list.

Clan works, http://eu.wargaming....lans/500065431/ working as intended are in 3th place with 38 members. No provinces. But above omni for example?

:o

 

The Standard System is sorting by recent WN8. The clan WORKS is a newly formed clan by german players to give a german representation in the top clan section. In Special as there is no real clan with german members which can hold against the top clans. And the last campaign showed that our best clans like OM and F4CE need more practice when it comes to face stronger clans, also the reputation was heavily damaged as Goldene Garde went to buy FAME players to play for them in the campaign resulting in "best german clan" while they just have around 1.500 WN8 average and no real clues about tactics. I am glad that there are german players willing to bring back attention and skill to the german clan reputation.

 

Greetings Toffer



panzertiger556 #5 Posted 13 July 2015 - 09:02 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17688 battles
  • 296
  • Member since:
    10-07-2012

View PostToffer1337, on 13 July 2015 - 08:45 AM, said:

 

The Standard System is sorting by recent WN8. The clan WORKS is a newly formed clan by german players to give a german representation in the top clan section. In Special as there is no real clan with german members which can hold against the top clans. And the last campaign showed that our best clans like OM and F4CE need more practice when it comes to face stronger clans, also the reputation was heavily damaged as Goldene Garde went to buy FAME players to play for them in the campaign resulting in "best german clan" while they just have around 1.500 WN8 average and no real clues about tactics. I am glad that there are german players willing to bring back attention and skill to the german clan reputation.

 

Greetings Toffer

What a joke sorry but playing tier 8 or playing t10 is a big diffrence neither OMNI nor OM has played alot of T8.



Time_To_BurN #6 Posted 13 July 2015 - 09:59 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 29189 battles
  • 185
  • Member since:
    06-01-2013

View PostToffer1337, on 13 July 2015 - 08:45 AM, said:

 

The Standard System is sorting by recent WN8. The clan WORKS is a newly formed clan by german players to give a german representation in the top clan section. In Special as there is no real clan with german members which can hold against the top clans. And the last campaign showed that our best clans like OM and F4CE need more practice when it comes to face stronger clans, also the reputation was heavily damaged as Goldene Garde went to buy FAME players to play for them in the campaign resulting in "best german clan" while they just have around 1.500 WN8 average and no real clues about tactics. I am glad that there are german players willing to bring back attention and skill to the german clan reputation.

 

Greetings Toffer

 

Sounds like a solid idea. All the best to them.

But recent WN8 as a measuring tool for the list seems like a great way to get the wrong view on the strenght of a clan. 



Anzezaf #7 Posted 13 July 2015 - 11:58 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21059 battles
  • 1,280
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011

I think it makes more sense to sort by overall WN8, activity and WG rating. Throw it all together with a simple formula that gives different weights to the three parameters, sum them all up, and voila.



Toffer1337 #8 Posted 13 July 2015 - 12:11 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28374 battles
  • 934
  • Member since:
    11-29-2012

View Postpanzertiger556, on 13 July 2015 - 08:02 AM, said:

What a joke sorry but playing tier 8 or playing t10 is a big diffrence neither OMNI nor OM has played alot of T8.

 

I really dont get your point panzertiger, what I wrote is no joke. OM went to get to place 112 so they didnt do good in this campaign. And you also wrote that OM didnt play a lot of T8 - and I wrote that OM and F4CE need more practice to fight stronger Clans. So I didnt write any jokes and you went to confirm as member of the Odem Mortis community here that there was training missing in both of the clans while it was possible for you to play teambattles and T8 strongholds to train skills in T8.

Parisija #9 Posted 13 July 2015 - 12:42 PM

  • Guest

I think there should be some sort of minimum to be on the list, clans with 18 people where only 4 of them are active in my opinion have no place in this list of top clans. There should be some sort of 'minimun 40 members to be on the list'.

 

Also, ranking only by recent wn8 maybe isn't the smartest. Do some kind of formula just like Anzezaf said or something like that...

 

On the other note, great job, +1...



Sylvansight #10 Posted 13 July 2015 - 01:27 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 29432 battles
  • 507
  • Member since:
    01-01-2013

non-WN8 version:

 

http://wotclans.net/eu/showclansrating



panzertiger556 #11 Posted 13 July 2015 - 01:36 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17688 battles
  • 296
  • Member since:
    10-07-2012

View PostToffer1337, on 13 July 2015 - 12:11 PM, said:

 

I really dont get your point panzertiger, what I wrote is no joke. OM went to get to place 112 so they didnt do good in this campaign. And you also wrote that OM didnt play a lot of T8 - and I wrote that OM and F4CE need more practice to fight stronger Clans. So I didnt write any jokes and you went to confirm as member of the Odem Mortis community here that there was training missing in both of the clans while it was possible for you to play teambattles and T8 strongholds to train skills in T8.

 

You clearly dont get the point. The campaign was crap the only reason why so many clans were infront of us were cause of the bonus points and shity rules, to say that OM or OMNI isnt any good cause of 1 short shity campaign is [edited]since we preform pretty good on the old and new clan wars map.

Henriques #12 Posted 13 July 2015 - 03:18 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 45186 battles
  • 517
  • [-LYNX] -LYNX
  • Member since:
    10-06-2010
kazna with 2650 recent is not doing very good latetly. 

moe77 #13 Posted 13 July 2015 - 04:36 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13426 battles
  • 1,732
  • [7-7-7] 7-7-7
  • Member since:
    10-20-2011

 

Jackpot Reroll Suspect: 0

Hunt, you might want to change this as i am now officially a third or fourth Account...

 

 

Nice List though, always nice to be able to quickly compare the e-pen of clans without opening 20+ tabs in the browser :)


Edited by moe77, 13 July 2015 - 04:37 PM.


HuntTiger #14 Posted 13 July 2015 - 05:48 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 27112 battles
  • 516
  • [LEOHQ] LEOHQ
  • Member since:
    04-06-2012

In fact there will be no number, no WN8, WN9 or Clanrating that is out of mistakes. I cant take all aspects of clan strength into one value.

But I think a limit for aktivity is something I should think of. Whats about more then 85 members, 50 aktive ?

 

View PostAnzezaf, on 13 July 2015 - 11:58 AM, said:

I think it makes more sense to sort by overall WN8, activity and WG rating. Throw it all together with a simple formula that gives different weights to the three parameters, sum them all up, and voila.

 

How could that formula look like? I would create a completely new Rating to rank the clans, it will be very difficult to do it well.

Lujan #15 Posted 13 July 2015 - 06:31 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 24099 battles
  • 1,072
  • [7-7-7] 7-7-7
  • Member since:
    08-21-2010

View PostHuntTiger, on 13 July 2015 - 04:48 PM, said:

In fact there will be no number, no WN8, WN9 or Clanrating that is out of mistakes. I cant take all aspects of clan strength into one value.

But I think a limit for aktivity is something I should think of. Whats about more then 85 members, 50 aktive ?

 

 

How could that formula look like? I would create a completely new Rating to rank the clans, it will be very difficult to do it well.

 

Why would you have 35 inactives as kind of a condition? With CW 2.0 a lot of Clans will get rid of their tokens. So just use the activity border. 50 active people is a pretty good cut.

Tarantula_xD #16 Posted 13 July 2015 - 06:52 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 19323 battles
  • 1,060
  • [MSGA] MSGA
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

Would be nice if you made some kind of clan description of what the clans are focusing on, previous accomplishments, monthly member traffic ect

 

WN8 aint everything :)

 


Edited by Tarantula_xD, 13 July 2015 - 06:59 PM.


Lujan #17 Posted 13 July 2015 - 07:10 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 24099 battles
  • 1,072
  • [7-7-7] 7-7-7
  • Member since:
    08-21-2010

View PostTarantula_xD, on 13 July 2015 - 05:52 PM, said:

Would be nice if you made some kind of clan description of what the clans are focusing on, previous accomplishments, monthly member traffic ect

 

WN8 aint everything :)

 

 

The member traffic would be kind of a good idea. Previous accomplishments would be a massive load of work for Hunti

HuntTiger #18 Posted 13 July 2015 - 07:32 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 27112 battles
  • 516
  • [LEOHQ] LEOHQ
  • Member since:
    04-06-2012

Member traffic is something I can realize.

Targets of the clan like clanwars, SHs or platoons is to mutch. I would have to look up in every clan description and change it, if any clan change it for themselfe. Maybe it is possible to show the level of Stronghold and the number of fighted skirmishes, maybe with winrate. I have to look for it.

Previous accomplishments is not practible for me, I think.



Anzezaf #19 Posted 13 July 2015 - 08:18 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21059 battles
  • 1,280
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011

View PostHuntTiger, on 13 July 2015 - 05:48 PM, said:

In fact there will be no number, no WN8, WN9 or Clanrating that is out of mistakes. I cant take all aspects of clan strength into one value.

But I think a limit for aktivity is something I should think of. Whats about more then 85 members, 50 aktive ?

 

 

How could that formula look like? I would create a completely new Rating to rank the clans, it will be very difficult to do it well.

 

Come to think of it, WG rating itself already takes activity into consideration, so no need to do it again in your rating.



Tarantula_xD #20 Posted 13 July 2015 - 10:19 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 19323 battles
  • 1,060
  • [MSGA] MSGA
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

View PostHuntTiger, on 13 July 2015 - 06:32 PM, said:

Member traffic is something I can realize.

Targets of the clan like clanwars, SHs or platoons is to mutch. I would have to look up in every clan description and change it, if any clan change it for themselfe. Maybe it is possible to show the level of Stronghold and the number of fighted skirmishes, maybe with winrate. I have to look for it.

Previous accomplishments is not practible for me, I think.

 

Clans that wish to add a description could pm you :)




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users