Jump to content


SP 1 C - After release feedback for future buffs


  • Please log in to reply
112 replies to this topic

Maauru #101 Posted 02 September 2015 - 10:23 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21422 battles
  • 809
  • Member since:
    03-29-2014

I think SPIC is quite good tank for it's tier. I do not have lot of LT experience and I only grinded French LT line (and that was only because I wanted BC25t) but I find SPIC better than AMX 13 75. Main reason is gun which is really good gun for T7 light IMHO.

 

I only have 2 complaints about SPIC. Not that they make it bad tank but that I would like them to be better:

 

- acceleration. I would it to accelerate better than it is since it is LT

- shell velocity. It is really quite awful almost like it is some derp gun. Do not really see reason why they give it so low shell velocity

 

But in general - it is nice tank although I will not keep it once I research RU251. I do not have spare German LT crew and I want this one (which is quite good one) in RU251.



jwu #102 Posted 02 September 2015 - 10:46 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 24829 battles
  • 3,231
  • Member since:
    02-06-2011

View PostMaauru, on 02 September 2015 - 10:23 AM, said:

 

- shell velocity. It is really quite awful almost like it is some derp gun. Do not really see reason why they give it so low shell velocity

 

It comes with an advantage though. The arced trajectory improves the impact angle on many sloped armor surfaces. A few degrees can make a big difference.



TacPenguin #103 Posted 08 September 2015 - 01:18 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44835 battles
  • 1,615
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011

The last gun is the auto loader i just noticed that i still have the rammer fitted from the non auto loader gun? 

 

Does the auto loader get any benifit from it??

 

Could do with fitting a stab in stead of it.

 

The Wiki states  "Rammers are NOT available for vehicles equipped with Autoloader guns. "

http://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Equipment

 

Odd as i have 1 fitted  :sceptic:

 

Thx

 

TacP


Edited by TacPenguin, 08 September 2015 - 01:20 PM.


Eila_Juutilainen #104 Posted 08 September 2015 - 02:20 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 21383 battles
  • 3,883
  • [102ND] 102ND
  • Member since:
    11-04-2012
Autoloader works just fine. The description is misleading and outdated. 59-16, AT 7 (stock gun) and Chi-Ri also can fit Gun Rammers.

TacPenguin #105 Posted 08 September 2015 - 03:08 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44835 battles
  • 1,615
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011

Thx for fast reply.

 

So i actually do get the faster reload with a rammer on this auto loader ?

 

If so the question is?

 

Rammer or

Stab

 

TacP



Eila_Juutilainen #106 Posted 08 September 2015 - 03:20 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 21383 battles
  • 3,883
  • [102ND] 102ND
  • Member since:
    11-04-2012
Yes and no. It will speed up the reload of your magazine, but it will not improve the time between shells, which remains fixed at 3 seconds no matter what.

TacPenguin #107 Posted 08 September 2015 - 04:08 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44835 battles
  • 1,615
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011

Cool thanks for clearing that up.  :honoring:

 

Ill swap rammer for stab to miss less.:trollface:

 

I do like this little tank.  As i saw earlier Tazilon  maybe?? called it a Cerebral tank.

 

You can't charge to normal spot points and you can't charge and yolo other light tanks. You really have to think and take your shot and move on.

 

TacP

 

 



jwu #108 Posted 09 September 2015 - 10:15 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 24829 battles
  • 3,231
  • Member since:
    02-06-2011
Yeah, the excellent gun depression enables it to sneak up on the enemy from really unusual positions. I like it a lot.

MartinRimas #109 Posted 18 September 2015 - 08:43 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 39363 battles
  • 53
  • Member since:
    04-15-2012
Just another WG crap. Ewerithing is just to slow for that kinde of tank. But it has better range view then all AMX lite tanks. That is all. Ingoi of quick deth Guys.

ZecvonZecstein #110 Posted 18 September 2015 - 09:21 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 111061 battles
  • 377
  • [FSKN] FSKN
  • Member since:
    10-30-2011
Needs higher shell velocity

Naglfarr #111 Posted 20 September 2015 - 01:55 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18531 battles
  • 476
  • [__SAU] __SAU
  • Member since:
    12-14-2012

I seriously don't get your issues with the SP1C. I'm a cssual 1k WN8 player and I score an average damage of 920 in this tank, resulting in 36 Fire for Effect awards out of 65 games. This tank is awesome! It's so small, it fits in every bush so you can do some serious passive scouting. Shell velocity is not that good, but you can always adust your aim, can't you? 

 

Himmelsdorf is a problem, especially in a tier X match of course. But i like the SP much more than i.e. The M41 because it's way smaller. With ~750 damage in 4-5 seconds you can do some serious damage if you choose the right targets. 

 

It's just a great tank.



Falc0ne #112 Posted 25 September 2015 - 05:02 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29349 battles
  • 1,265
  • [AVIR] AVIR
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

Correct Naglfarr

 

https://drive.google...sTkk/view?pli=1

 

https://drive.google...xSUU/view?pli=1

 

4,4k dmg on X tiers. Lost because BC 155-55 didnt shoot even once to help me with Leo.

 

 



wetdogsmells #113 Posted 20 December 2015 - 06:11 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 14847 battles
  • 43
  • Member since:
    08-16-2011

an actually preferred the "awful" panther over the sp 1c..and i was for some time mainly a light driver. you have to shoot gold at almost everything you see in mm, its slow off the mark, the auto is pretty inaccurate and the shell velocity is slow as if your shooting melons. 

 

most tanks you see in the mm will 1/2 shot you easy, and the french lights can clip you relatively easy if caught out. 

 

i had 3 choices of tanks unlocked the panther 2, t34-2 and the sp 1c..i made a huge mistake.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users