Jump to content


World Of Warplanes Tech tree


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
98 replies to this topic

DonR #41 Posted 15 August 2011 - 03:35 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 14965 battles
  • 51
  • [C9] C9
  • Member since:
    03-16-2011

View PostRustyGalloway, on 15 August 2011 - 02:00 PM, said:

This "russian bias" thing is getting ridiculously old. If you have nothing better to contribute with, please refrain from posting. If it even was funny in the first place (Which I personally think it wasn't), it certainly isn't funny anymore.

Just leave our community if you really hate Wargaming and their balancing so bad. You are not obliged to play, you know.

good one...

Where i sayd something about "russian bias"?  Just look at mause, then t30 and then on is7? For me its funny how those 2 looks old to futuritic is7. I play german tanks and i dont think in any way that rusian are op, they just have own role in game and when i see is-4 i only think about good challenge for my vk45, nothing more. And if you dont have anything better to contribute, only just to say that "russian bias" is old and something isn't funny refrain from posting...

View PostSpaceSoviet, on 15 August 2011 - 02:58 PM, said:

DonR posts: 2

don't feed the little troll ;)

so what? you have from beginnig over 100 posts? you must start somehow  :rolleyes:

Aigars #42 Posted 15 August 2011 - 04:43 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 25556 battles
  • 140
  • [BAOR] BAOR
  • Member since:
    08-24-2010
YES SAW HO-229 that plane for me will be MUST get :) now were are beta key?

power4 #43 Posted 15 August 2011 - 04:56 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10346 battles
  • 255
  • Member since:
    03-06-2011
why they never make an 4th tech tree like japanese? the official screenshot have a zero to the left side!

kalligrapher #44 Posted 15 August 2011 - 05:04 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 4637 battles
  • 9
  • Member since:
    07-13-2011
Unlike tanks, there is little justification for missing out the British (or Japanese) aircraft tech trees from WoW.  The ability to fly the Zero or the Hurricane would be a far bigger enticement to join up for myself at least.  There is one question that I do have about WoW that is off-topic though .. since there is no need for terrain and all the workload that entails for the CPU - does that mean there could be more than 15 per side?

Sotahullu #45 Posted 15 August 2011 - 05:53 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 15540 battles
  • 684
  • Member since:
    10-15-2010
Well if i did understand correctly than German tree got 5 diffrent models of legendary Bf109.  :P

Dont_Stop #46 Posted 15 August 2011 - 06:52 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 30500 battles
  • 514
  • Member since:
    02-16-2011

View Postslaydo, on 14 August 2011 - 08:40 AM, said:

page is in russian. can´t understand a bloody thing. Is there a English version?

Use Chrome browser for that purpose.

Hellbanan #47 Posted 15 August 2011 - 06:56 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 29842 battles
  • 544
  • Member since:
    01-27-2011
I wonder how much realism there's gonna be in that game. Hopefully they don't make the controls to much arcade (I hate the games where you can fly maneuvers like an outside loop in early WW2 planes).

Btw why not some different BF109. Maybe the BF109A as low level entry plane with just two MGs, then the BF109C or D with it's additional two wing MGs, hte BF109E with canons instead of the wing MGs and the BF109G as the Top BF109 model. Better some real planes than to many fictional warbirds.

H4RT_of_STEAL #48 Posted 15 August 2011 - 08:13 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44182 battles
  • 1,376
  • Member since:
    03-25-2011
i have my doubts that the game will be balanced in any way... i know the pilot makes the difference but sometimes even the pilot isnt able to cope with that...

it will be especially difficult to balnce the game if they add a module techtree like in wot...im already seeing bf109e fighting spitfires with griffon engines or mustangs

swedewolf #49 Posted 15 August 2011 - 10:46 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6333 battles
  • 13
  • Member since:
    07-17-2011
I dont read kyril but thanx anyway

PltSgtMac #50 Posted 15 August 2011 - 11:41 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 771 battles
  • 19
  • Member since:
    04-12-2011
I just hope the beta comes out soon.http://cdn-frm-eu.wa.../Smile_harp.gif

SchlachterSUN #51 Posted 16 August 2011 - 10:02 AM

    Private

  • Beta Tester
  • 3861 battles
  • 9
  • Member since:
    03-17-2010
Again, they claim to be a global company and russians are getting way more info ahead of the rest, people can even apply to alpha test...

Thats how you treat the rest of your customers?

Elianto75 #52 Posted 16 August 2011 - 10:11 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10932 battles
  • 223
  • Member since:
    05-26-2011
There are so many games on WW2 planes and IL2 is freely playable online. I really think that they had to make the game about WWI biplanes, more enjoyable.

H4RT_of_STEAL #53 Posted 16 August 2011 - 10:19 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44182 battles
  • 1,376
  • Member since:
    03-25-2011

View PostElianto75, on 16 August 2011 - 10:11 AM, said:

There are so many games on WW2 planes and IL2 is freely playable online. I really think that they had to make the game about WWI biplanes, more enjoyable.
there is one^^ called "rise of flight" and its made by russians too and its fantastic!

del500780009 #54 Posted 16 August 2011 - 10:42 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 1 battle
  • 950
  • Member since:
    06-05-2011

View PostDonR, on 15 August 2011 - 03:35 PM, said:

good one...

Where i sayd something about "russian bias"?

In your post. That post was saying one, and one thing only: "The Russian planes will be OP". You didn't contribute with anything else than this.

Let me refresh your memory: You posted "suggestions" for the three tier 10 fighter planes:

USA tier 10: Corsair from the 1940's
Germany tier 10: Messerschmitt from late 1930's - early 1940's
USSR tier 10: MiG or Sukhoi from the 1980's

Please explain to me how this can be interpreted as anything else than the old "Russian OP, Russian bias"-trolling?

LoveAmiga #55 Posted 17 August 2011 - 08:25 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32232 battles
  • 239
  • Member since:
    05-15-2011
Why the hell even have a Russian tree? Their planes sucked. No English or Japanese? Just too stupid.

Nikola_Bathory #56 Posted 17 August 2011 - 10:22 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Translator
  • 22170 battles
  • 564
  • [HWBG] HWBG
  • Member since:
    07-27-2010
Bomben auf England!

Dr_Nooooo #57 Posted 17 August 2011 - 04:29 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 13211 battles
  • 1,415
  • Member since:
    07-19-2010

View PostLoveAmiga, on 17 August 2011 - 08:25 AM, said:

Why the hell even have a Russian tree? Their planes sucked. No English or Japanese? Just too stupid.

It is logical as the former soviet union and east europe is the main market of wargaming.

Kifli #58 Posted 17 August 2011 - 05:32 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 8622 battles
  • 719
  • Member since:
    07-08-2010

View PostLoveAmiga, on 17 August 2011 - 08:25 AM, said:

Why the hell even have a Russian tree? Their planes sucked. No English or Japanese? Just too stupid.
you are just stupid and ignorant . during war russians have same quality planes or even better that germans . Russian tech tree are superior to german and have more advanced planes just like in wot . But USA looks even better .

Mechbull #59 Posted 19 August 2011 - 06:40 PM

    Private

  • Beta Tester
  • 3686 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    11-22-2010

View Postslaydo, on 14 August 2011 - 08:40 AM, said:

page is in russian. can´t understand a bloody thing. Is there a English version?

Rus -> Eng

I guess that works for now..

Sar1n #60 Posted 19 August 2011 - 07:37 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3607 battles
  • 278
  • Member since:
    06-06-2011
@Kifli: USSR air force was always more about quantity than quality. One on one, Soviets managed to catch up with US designs only around Korean war (conveniently just where the WoWP tech trees end...btw, I really think including jets is a screwup, they should be separated from piston engined planes).

Well, looking at the trees...I gotta say, WTF. Where's F7F, P-61? What about B-25, gunship variants would be soooo apreciated...

BTW, looking forward to seeing all those rageposts about AR-234 pilots being thrown into dogfights...




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users