Jump to content


Update 9.10: Release on Wednesday 02 September


  • Please log in to reply
160 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 01 September 2015 - 02:42 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 24,487
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Our new update will bring a branch of Japanese heavy tanks, the new Rampage event, additional vehicles reworked for HD quality, significant changes to Team Battles as well as map distribution by vehicle Tier, and much more…

Full news text


Tahdon_kutitella_sua_XD #2 Posted 01 September 2015 - 02:49 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 43703 battles
  • 391
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    11-13-2012

Ready for Type5? :)



BatelGeuce #3 Posted 01 September 2015 - 02:51 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 27126 battles
  • 2,193
  • [CSA-2] CSA-2
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011
The "Updates" section link contains information about changes between 9.8 and 9.9 ... At least for me ...

Eaglax #4 Posted 01 September 2015 - 02:58 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18973 battles
  • 3,481
  • Member since:
    01-12-2012

wow an announcement before the actual "event" hits us? :great: would be nice if that would become the standard

 

edit

View PostBatelGeuce, on 01 September 2015 - 03:51 PM, said:

The "Updates" section link contains information about changes between 9.8 and 9.9 ... At least for me ...

 

switch to english, than you have the 9.10 changes, in german it is also 9.8 to9.9

 

edit 2 nvm, you only get the vehicle changes from 9.10(e.g. new jap heavys), everything else is still 9.8 to 9.9. I wonder how WG-EU manged to do that XD


Edited by DocPurple, 01 September 2015 - 03:04 PM.


Wumbolo #5 Posted 01 September 2015 - 03:00 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7426 battles
  • 41
  • [CROAT] CROAT
  • Member since:
    10-30-2013

I will not play 9.10 just because the map distribution changes. I am not new to the game and I have seen all the maps in the game plenty of times :facepalm: (except Stalingrad and Overlord). I am hyped for the Japanese heavies but I can grind them whenever I feel it.

And also, I will never again play low tiers until they revert these changes. I am not happy with not removing Mittengard but don't care about Province.

 

Question, are Province, Hidden Village and Pearl River removed from the Training Room? If yes, that's too bad.

 

View PostDocPurple, on 01 September 2015 - 01:58 PM, said:

wow an announcement before the actual "event" hits us? :great: would be nice if that would become the standard

Yes that would be useful.


Edited by Martinjk83, 01 September 2015 - 03:02 PM.


Jim_Kirk #6 Posted 01 September 2015 - 03:03 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 44750 battles
  • 11
  • [PA_HU] PA_HU
  • Member since:
    03-06-2011
WOW we get info a WHOLE DAY before patch. Why not a day after?

Dvi_rankis #7 Posted 01 September 2015 - 03:05 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 30512 battles
  • 38
  • Member since:
    07-31-2012
Something to look forward for tomorrow. Yet, I feel that those big sluggish Japanese Heavies will have a hard time to find a place vs other colossus tanks. It might be just another uni-cums toy in a garage? :child:

laserad #8 Posted 01 September 2015 - 03:21 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 32949 battles
  • 625
  • Member since:
    06-15-2012
its a nice content patch without a doubt, I would still like to hear some new info on the motion physics update...

leggasiini #9 Posted 01 September 2015 - 03:21 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 9661 battles
  • 5,814
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

The exact reaction of Tier 3s when they face 100 ton monstrosity which is about as big as Maus, can oneshot every single tier 3 in the game and can ram everything into death, O-I Experimental.



KRUPP__STEEL #10 Posted 01 September 2015 - 03:29 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 4716 battles
  • 197
  • [13KIL] 13KIL
  • Member since:
    10-31-2014
more fantasy, I would like the starship enterprise on wot next eh lol

lord_chipmonk #11 Posted 01 September 2015 - 03:32 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 32183 battles
  • 10,166
  • [-HOW-] -HOW-
  • Member since:
    12-23-2012

View PostKRUPP__STEEL, on 01 September 2015 - 03:29 PM, said:

more fantasy, I would like the starship enterprise on wot next eh lol

 

You think people complain about arty and TDs now? Wait 'til they take a photon torpedo to the face. 

Vedrano #12 Posted 01 September 2015 - 03:43 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 37254 battles
  • 309
  • Member since:
    08-21-2011

I have 9 tier X tanks, total of 34, but i only play T3-5 tanks basicly, so i'm screwd now with just a few maps :/ 

 

 



_Banana_Republic_ #13 Posted 01 September 2015 - 03:44 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 41547 battles
  • 1,080
  • Member since:
    03-22-2015
finnaly an update when we are sleeping...

Zhu_Bajie #14 Posted 01 September 2015 - 03:55 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 16949 battles
  • 70
  • Member since:
    03-24-2013
In all honesty, i think this change to the map distribution for lower tier is horrible.

I enjoy all tiers, high, mid and low tier games - I really do enjoy some of the machines on tier 1-4 now and then, especially if it is a good fight for both teams (especially since the implementation of the beginner protection mm), but this just makes it more frustrating and boring.

Especially annoying and disappointing for players like me, who have bought tier 2 and 3 premium tanks (from cheap to expensive), and now they cut off so much content. i will really have fun playing low tier premiums now...
I honestly don't believe that new players will learn the game better or enjoy the game more by taking away maps either.
 

Why on earth WG would think this was a good idea I simply cannot fathom.

Just think how boring it will be for new players and more experienced players alike to play hundreds of games on the same 2-3 maps - and yes new players might play tier 1-4 for many hundreds of games.

 

Then they come up with this plan...

As for the limited number of maps that tier 4-6 will play on (7 maps), it makes even less sense.



It is basically not new content in this patch, but less content. :teethhappy:

Hero_of_Tython #15 Posted 01 September 2015 - 04:08 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22730 battles
  • 786
  • [UP-EM] UP-EM
  • Member since:
    04-19-2014

This is good news, as the new Jap Heavies will be just the thing to help with the WZ grind mission, especially as I have enough free xp in the bank to go straight to a fully upgraded tier VI.

 



DA_ZOHAN #16 Posted 01 September 2015 - 04:43 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53102 battles
  • 1,536
  • Member since:
    07-28-2013

View PostInverse_IV, on 01 September 2015 - 05:08 PM, said:

This is good news, as the new Jap Heavies will be just the thing to help with the WZ grind mission, especially as I have enough free xp in the bank to go straight to a fully upgraded tier VI.

 

 

U didnt obtain it last time?

DA_ZOHAN #17 Posted 01 September 2015 - 04:47 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53102 battles
  • 1,536
  • Member since:
    07-28-2013

View PostZhu_Bajie, on 01 September 2015 - 04:55 PM, said:

In all honesty, i think this change to the map distribution for lower tier is horrible.

I enjoy all tiers, high, mid and low tier games - I really do enjoy some of the machines on tier 1-4 now and then, especially if it is a good fight for both teams (especially since the implementation of the beginner protection mm), but this just makes it more frustrating and boring.

Especially annoying and disappointing for players like me, who have bought tier 2 and 3 premium tanks (from cheap to expensive), and now they cut off so much content. i will really have fun playing low tier premiums now...
I honestly don't believe that new players will learn the game better or enjoy the game more by taking away maps either.
 

Why on earth WG would think this was a good idea I simply cannot fathom.

Just think how boring it will be for new players and more experienced players alike to play hundreds of games on the same 2-3 maps - and yes new players might play tier 1-4 for many hundreds of games.

 

Then they come up with this plan...

As for the limited number of maps that tier 4-6 will play on (7 maps), it makes even less sense.



It is basically not new content in this patch, but less content. :teethhappy:

 

Experienced players with multi perk crews are one of the main reasons why newbies quit the game. [edited]

I think that WG would be better off putting newbies into 7 vs 7 matches if there are not enough newbies on rather then throw them into the deep end and face off the pedobears.

I enjoy a low tier game as much as the next guy, but it really is unfair for the newbies with the 75% or 50% crews that dont know they should retrain thier tier 1 crews or for that matter probably dont have the credits to do so.

I think of all the mistakes I did in my 1st 4-5k games and :facepalm:.

 

This colour red text is reserved for wg staff only.


Edited by Neilloss46, 03 September 2015 - 01:15 PM.
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content. Neilloss46


_b_ #18 Posted 01 September 2015 - 05:23 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 54009 battles
  • 3,742
  • Member since:
    04-06-2011

Have played the jap heavies on test...from tier six and up (to long queues on lower)...and must admit that even if I like "underdog" tanks not even sure I'll be bothered to grind up this tree... 

 

Now, me being me I'll most likely end up playing my way up anyway...but I'll not spend any free exp on these exp-pinjatas!

 

This line will be gruelling to play (at least with the amount of premium ammo flying around even on regular server)



Pansenmann #19 Posted 01 September 2015 - 06:12 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33273 battles
  • 12,043
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

Wait, Company battles being removed?

That's bad. :(



Shaka_D #20 Posted 01 September 2015 - 06:24 PM

    Colonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 37654 battles
  • 3,761
  • Member since:
    10-18-2010

What do they mean by this: Fixed the issues with conditions and descriptions of some personal missions.

 

What issues with conditions are they referring to?






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users