Jump to content


List of missing tank names


  • Please log in to reply
273 replies to this topic

kallyd #261 Posted 01 January 2016 - 07:54 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 52463 battles
  • 3
  • [BGTED] BGTED
  • Member since:
    05-24-2013
Put Daimler Lynx Scout Car or just Lynx Scout Car

josemendes111 #262 Posted 01 January 2016 - 11:17 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 41826 battles
  • 5
  • [ELCC] ELCC
  • Member since:
    06-11-2013

M 578 ARv

 



z4r4z4 #263 Posted 04 January 2016 - 11:21 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Member
  • 82380 battles
  • 64
  • [PUNKS] PUNKS
  • Member since:
    02-15-2011

Type 93 / sumida type 2593

sumidatype2593.png

 



z4r4z4 #264 Posted 06 January 2016 - 02:10 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Member
  • 82380 battles
  • 64
  • [PUNKS] PUNKS
  • Member since:
    02-15-2011
Type 93 / sumida type 2593 - second image

Attached Files

  • Attached File   sumidatype2593_2.png   337.11K


z4r4z4 #265 Posted 06 January 2016 - 02:27 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Member
  • 82380 battles
  • 64
  • [PUNKS] PUNKS
  • Member since:
    02-15-2011

Matilda Baron 

 

Attached Files

  • Attached File   matilda_baron.png   319.68K

Edited by z4r4z4, 06 January 2016 - 02:28 PM.


Kupsztas #266 Posted 03 February 2016 - 12:36 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18989 battles
  • 1,309
  • [PUNKS] PUNKS
  • Member since:
    02-02-2014

so, the panzer 58 mutz was added to WoT, and it seems it appears in hidden archives now, too. 

unfortunately, someone forgot to put the name on the list at the same time.

 

the closest we have is panzer 61, but the one on photo above is clearly different from a panzer 61. I'm gonna check if marking it as panzer 61 will be correct or not.

 

solved - very early version of panzer 61


Edited by Kupsztas, 03 February 2016 - 08:47 AM.


Pantserbeest #267 Posted 03 February 2016 - 04:47 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 13714 battles
  • 43
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

View PostKupsztas, on 03 February 2016 - 12:36 AM, said:

so, the panzer 58 mutz was added to WoT, and it seems it appears in hidden archives now, too. 

unfortunately, someone forgot to put the name on the list at the same time.

 

the closest we have is panzer 61, but the one on photo above is clearly different from a panzer 61. I'm gonna check if marking it as panzer 61 will be correct or not.

 

Actually that does look more like a Panzer 61 to me. Compare the gun mantlets.

Kupsztas #268 Posted 03 February 2016 - 08:46 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18989 battles
  • 1,309
  • [PUNKS] PUNKS
  • Member since:
    02-02-2014

View PostPantserbeest, on 03 February 2016 - 04:47 AM, said:

 

Actually that does look more like a Panzer 61 to me. Compare the gun mantlets.

 

all panzers 61 I found had this horizontally placed piece of metal on upper front plate, while 58 has a clean front. (btw what is this piece of metal for? it looks like roof snow holder, but I really don't know what is it for on a tank).

but I must agree that the gun looks more like panzer 61 - there is this barrel in the middle, while 58 has a clean gun.

I'm confused, I decided this is not 61 looking at the hull.

 

okay, I found this photo on weaponsystems.net:

it is marked as panzer 61 and has hull identical with panzer 58. probably the photo from hidden archives is a very early version of 61.

you are damn right, Pantserbeest.

 

edit: this is funny, I found the same photo, but in colour on rita status report:

http://ftr.wot-news....and-the-others/

 

 

 

so... sorry for bringing up some spam in thread


Edited by Kupsztas, 03 February 2016 - 08:51 AM.


_DynamicGameplay_ #269 Posted 07 February 2016 - 10:37 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39744 battles
  • 1,304
  • [FEED] FEED
  • Member since:
    08-02-2011

2 months and there is still no Trackless tank T-13 Hornet B put as option to name a tank.

How funny...



Pantserbeest #270 Posted 08 February 2016 - 03:15 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 13714 battles
  • 43
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

View Post__Napoleon__, on 07 February 2016 - 10:37 PM, said:

2 months and there is still no Trackless tank T-13 Hornet B put as option to name a tank.

How funny...

 

No end of round 2, no  addition of new pictures for more than a month, no new names added to the list, no communication from staff, nothing, nada, nichts. Unfortunately I get the feeling that WG and Bovington don't really care about this project.

Edited by Pantserbeest, 08 February 2016 - 03:15 AM.


Kupsztas #271 Posted 08 February 2016 - 09:00 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18989 battles
  • 1,309
  • [PUNKS] PUNKS
  • Member since:
    02-02-2014

I feel that they just gave it to one person, but as an addition to his previous work, not as a full time job. so he just doesn't have time for that.

or he is just a student and works after hours on this. 

so I'm not sure who and how blame for the lack of work on hidden archives. the only thing i'm sure is that this game needs more attention from people moderating it.



_DynamicGameplay_ #272 Posted 08 February 2016 - 10:13 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39744 battles
  • 1,304
  • [FEED] FEED
  • Member since:
    08-02-2011
Regardless, I think it would be a nice and appreciated gesture that people who actually contributed to this project (naming tanks that are missing, pointing out to various bugs etc.) also receive some small token of gratitude which, in the end, won't cost WG a dime and would be a nice incentive for people to keep helping.

Idahou #273 Posted 08 February 2016 - 11:34 AM

    General

  • Veteran
  • 32611 battles
  • 8,000
  • [IDDQD] IDDQD
  • Member since:
    12-04-2010

Well, its logical that Bovington dont have staff just for this and i would say that they collected more data than what can they handle. After all, its not exactly game, but way how to help and sort photos whats looks like game. So in that point im tottally ok with no progress and delays...

 

but...

 

Fact that nobody tell us where is problem and when it will be fixed, moved on, thats just fail and backstab. I didnt play for golds (but yes, its nice to get some reward ) but to help bovington and WG cant even spare 3 minutes of theirs time to just inform us? To appolohize?

 

Thats just sick and definetly not how should such a company act...



emiltavroh #274 Posted 03 December 2016 - 08:20 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    12-03-2016
emil horvat 007 james bont




3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users