Jump to content


Best clan EU?


  • Please log in to reply
36 replies to this topic

Inspired_ #1 Posted 21 October 2015 - 05:36 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 21839 battles
  • 70
  • Member since:
    05-24-2013

 

They obviously realize that this is going to annoy people or they wouldn't be covering their stronghold.

Anyone from G__G have anything to say? :)

 



Azusa_right_in_the_pusah #2 Posted 21 October 2015 - 05:55 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23617 battles
  • 771
  • Member since:
    02-08-2012
Tier 2 rigged game with T10's so they get massive WN8 boost, i don't see why they would be any danger .. they look good but play like greens

Inspired_ #3 Posted 21 October 2015 - 05:59 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 21839 battles
  • 70
  • Member since:
    05-24-2013
yeah of course they're not any danger, I was just wondering what the reason for the wn8 padding is.

B4NTER #4 Posted 21 October 2015 - 06:55 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38821 battles
  • 970
  • [ROIDS] ROIDS
  • Member since:
    07-11-2013

View PostAzusa_, on 21 October 2015 - 04:55 PM, said:

Tier 2 rigged game with T10's so they get massive WN8 boost, i don't see why they would be any danger .. they look good but play like greens

 

they rigged it in a clan war, same with this acc

http://wot-life.com/...NAUTl-529297704

but you can see this acc plays a lot of SH and TB



arturo112 #5 Posted 21 October 2015 - 08:00 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9034 battles
  • 578
  • Member since:
    06-02-2013

View PostB4NTER, on 21 October 2015 - 06:55 PM, said:

 

they rigged it in a clan war, same with this acc

http://wot-life.com/...NAUTl-529297704

but you can see this acc plays a lot of SH and TB

 

I think those accounts were actually done in tank companies, but same principle.

Atrevir #6 Posted 21 October 2015 - 08:23 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 18480 battles
  • 971
  • [PTS-D] PTS-D
  • Member since:
    09-05-2010
Everyone knows all those garde clans are huge shits

Paris_Hilton #7 Posted 22 October 2015 - 01:08 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 32820 battles
  • 4,223
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    10-10-2011

View PostAtrevir, on 21 October 2015 - 08:23 PM, said:

Everyone knows all those garde clans are huge shits

 

if not played by daddy clanu "insert name" :trollface:

B4NTER #8 Posted 22 October 2015 - 10:20 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38821 battles
  • 970
  • [ROIDS] ROIDS
  • Member since:
    07-11-2013

View Postarturo112, on 21 October 2015 - 07:00 PM, said:

 

I think those accounts were actually done in tank companies, but same principle.

 

no if you check his stats it says hes played one clan war

Raffy5 #9 Posted 22 October 2015 - 10:52 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26711 battles
  • 1,977
  • Member since:
    07-09-2012

View PostParis_Hilton, on 22 October 2015 - 02:08 AM, said:

 

if not played by daddy clanu "insert name" :trollface:

 

Any one with a famous name? :trollface:

arturo112 #10 Posted 22 October 2015 - 11:14 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9034 battles
  • 578
  • Member since:
    06-02-2013

View PostB4NTER, on 22 October 2015 - 10:20 AM, said:

 

no if you check his stats it says hes played one clan war

 

One has played 2/2 in TCs: 

The other has played 3/4 in TCs:



creator__ #11 Posted 22 October 2015 - 11:22 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28605 battles
  • 420
  • [ROIDS] ROIDS
  • Member since:
    08-03-2012
Never keeps removing them, but then they just remove and recruit the guy again to show up in the top 10 clans on EU. its pretty retarded

FIoris #12 Posted 22 October 2015 - 08:57 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 29988 battles
  • 648
  • Member since:
    06-27-2012
Maybe he should remove the clan from the rankings :P

arturo112 #13 Posted 22 October 2015 - 11:51 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9034 battles
  • 578
  • Member since:
    06-02-2013

View PostFIoris, on 22 October 2015 - 08:57 PM, said:

Maybe he should remove the clan from the rankings :P

 

I think a better way to do it might to be to average the whole clan as if it was one player, that is sum (WN8 * battles) then divide by the total number of battles of all players in the clan. Would be interesting to see at the very least.

Inspired_ #14 Posted 23 October 2015 - 12:49 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 21839 battles
  • 70
  • Member since:
    05-24-2013

The worst part isn't even keeping this guy in their clan, its that they've covered their stronghold because they know they'll get bad publicity from it :teethhappy:


Edited by Inspired_, 23 October 2015 - 12:49 AM.


NikLemos #15 Posted 23 October 2015 - 09:45 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 53062 battles
  • 697
  • Member since:
    07-17-2011

 I decided to join the most powerful clan in Europe, according to wn8.I went to the site http://wotlabs.net and saw that it was a clan [CR_], filled application and here I am.

 

Of course they are not so strong like my russian cybersport team, but very good.


Edited by NikLemos, 23 October 2015 - 09:49 AM.


knightM #16 Posted 23 October 2015 - 10:27 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 46340 battles
  • 1,670
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    02-20-2012

Some people just take WN8 way too seriously...

 

it's an indicator, not absolute measure.

 

For it to be exactly comparable you'd need to play same tanks for same number of battles.

And that number would have to be high on each of the tanks (150ish)... and you'd need to play them at same time (tanks get nerf/buffed a lot). Also WN8 gets less accurate the higher you get, values over 3000 are especially inaccurate due to different tank scaling which is not taken into account. Lots of people can get over 10k WN8 in a battle on M41 or BC, almost nobody ever did that in BC arty.  Maybe WN9 will fix that a bit if it starts to get used.

 

@NikLemos, you know if you just use the WN8 clan indicator value on wotlabs you get that CR_ is second best clan in the world.  

 


Edited by knightM, 23 October 2015 - 10:29 AM.


Axarn #17 Posted 23 October 2015 - 12:50 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26769 battles
  • 915
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    03-29-2013
You can have an average WN8 of 2977, 54.11% WR. But the question remains.
Can you draw a fish in MSPaint?

B4NTER #18 Posted 23 October 2015 - 01:07 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38821 battles
  • 970
  • [ROIDS] ROIDS
  • Member since:
    07-11-2013

View Postarturo112, on 22 October 2015 - 10:14 AM, said:

 

One has played 2/2 in TCs: 

The other has played 3/4 in TCs:

 

im talking about the guy from CR_

FIoris #19 Posted 23 October 2015 - 02:56 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 29988 battles
  • 648
  • Member since:
    06-27-2012

View Postarturo112, on 22 October 2015 - 11:51 PM, said:

 

I think a better way to do it might to be to average the whole clan as if it was one player, that is sum (WN8 * battles) then divide by the total number of battles of all players in the clan. Would be interesting to see at the very least.

 

Its actually kinda bad that it doesnt do this. Rerolls with high WN8 and low battle count skew the ratings. I always thought it was weighted average, maybe its time wotlabs implements that. Not that I ever look at those ratings but still... it would make em more legit.

joyuesp #20 Posted 23 October 2015 - 03:33 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 52174 battles
  • 7,698
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    01-22-2012
that could be reported as clan wars/companies(or whatever was it) rigging?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users