Jump to content


Campaings only for big clans

campaigns clanwars notforeverybody

  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

tdradrian #1 Posted 25 October 2015 - 07:50 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 64234 battles
  • 35
  • [HIDRO] HIDRO
  • Member since:
    12-09-2012

I have started this topic because i am very disappointed about the direction of WOT.

First of all on the rules of this campaigns are only  in favor of big clans; Why?

I personally don t understand why,   because they earn 50 to 100 k gold monthly they never spent a dime on premium acc or tanks, we do . You, dear Wot, do not offer nothing to us, not even the chance to win  a shitty  tank, therefor I announce you that I am never going to spend 1 $ on your game.

According to your rules if the clan is in the first 70 they get 100 tanks so they are able to give to the players that have minimum 5 battles so what happened is that they have exchanged acc in order to play for those who could not come . This is how people who didn t care about the campaign have the tank in there garage ,and others who was present every night didn't .

Why didn t you stay to the first rules when first 10000 got the tank that was normal, they earmn gold they sell gold they don t give you any money and you give them presents gg WOT you will remain only with those in a future.

Once again if think of your pockets, think of us we pay you salkaries not them.

tdradrian

 



YouPuB #2 Posted 25 October 2015 - 08:05 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16667 battles
  • 284
  • Member since:
    01-20-2013

they drop to tier 8 format. They added quests so that you might still make nice points with 1 line up by farming main missions.

They cleared my a favor to smaller clans.

Cant see what's wrong with this.

And if you dont want to cash out money in the game. It's fine as you dont have to pay for a free to play :B



Toffer1337 #3 Posted 25 October 2015 - 08:07 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28374 battles
  • 934
  • Member since:
    11-29-2012
Santi made place 7 with only 50 active members (We also have second accounts / inactives) - so there is no reason at all in your Topic.

arturo112 #4 Posted 25 October 2015 - 08:34 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9034 battles
  • 578
  • Member since:
    06-02-2013

I agree with the OP, I think that all rewards should be given out to random players rather than there being any competition, because competition triggers me and this tank game should be a safe space for me since I play for fun.

 

Or something like that.



storm4710 #5 Posted 25 October 2015 - 09:41 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18515 battles
  • 729
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    12-21-2012

View Posttdradrian, on 25 October 2015 - 07:50 PM, said:

I have started this topic because i am very disappointed about the direction of WOT.

First of all on the rules of this campaigns are only  in favor of big clans; Why?

I personally don t understand why,   because they earn 50 to 100 k gold monthly they never spent a dime on premium acc or tanks, we do . You, dear Wot, do not offer nothing to us, not even the chance to win  a shitty  tank, therefor I announce you that I am never going to spend 1 $ on your game.

According to your rules if the clan is in the first 70 they get 100 tanks so they are able to give to the players that have minimum 5 battles so what happened is that they have exchanged acc in order to play for those who could not come . This is how people who didn t care about the campaign have the tank in there garage ,and others who was present every night didn't .

Why didn t you stay to the first rules when first 10000 got the tank that was normal, they earmn gold they sell gold they don t give you any money and you give them presents gg WOT you will remain only with those in a future.

Once again if think of your pockets, think of us we pay you salkaries not them.

tdradrian

 

sry dude

but your clan only had 2112 famepoints in total 
how many people played 

we had between 31-40 being ready and playing 4 hours every day(in total 61 players got to play the safari mission)
in our best day we made more famepoints then your clan has in total(for the whole Safari operation)

because i made a list of the guys that were on low games we got 56 out 92 players to get the tank(without my list that would have been more like 48)
nobody in our clan let other people play each others account(that is imo the most shitty way to get a tank) 
sry dude i feel for u
but 10v10 means u just need 20 to 30 active players,



Otto_von_HEATmarck #6 Posted 25 October 2015 - 10:37 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 37853 battles
  • 4,501
  • Member since:
    09-19-2012
Yep, money for nothing and the chicks for free

Le_bon_Roy_Henri_FR #7 Posted 25 October 2015 - 10:45 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 56181 battles
  • 281
  • Member since:
    12-08-2012
Participating is more important than winning. :trollface:

HeRR_Baguette_PL #8 Posted 26 October 2015 - 01:32 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39459 battles
  • 1,981
  • [EGO-] EGO-
  • Member since:
    04-30-2011
ask sirvasy "FEEL bob" he got the answer 

Uanubis #9 Posted 26 October 2015 - 12:06 PM

    Streamer

  • Player
  • 54600 battles
  • 2,083
  • [HALUS] HALUS
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011
Seriously? With my clan, we pushed 13 people on tank (regularly and with wildcards, pretty much everyone that played regularly) and we are WAY worse then your clan. Plus this was our first time ever playing on T8...

SteveGER #10 Posted 26 October 2015 - 02:15 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23360 battles
  • 875
  • [ROIDS] ROIDS
  • Member since:
    11-10-2012

View Posttdradrian, on 25 October 2015 - 07:50 PM, said:

I have started this topic because i am very disappointed about the direction of WOT.

First of all on the rules of this campaigns are only  in favor of big clans; Why?

I personally don t understand why,   because they earn 50 to 100 k gold monthly they never spent a dime on premium acc or tanks, we do . You, dear Wot, do not offer nothing to us, not even the chance to win  a shitty  tank, therefor I announce you that I am never going to spend 1 $ on your game.

According to your rules if the clan is in the first 70 they get 100 tanks so they are able to give to the players that have minimum 5 battles so what happened is that they have exchanged acc in order to play for those who could not come . This is how people who didn t care about the campaign have the tank in there garage ,and others who was present every night didn't .

Why didn t you stay to the first rules when first 10000 got the tank that was normal, they earmn gold they sell gold they don t give you any money and you give them presents gg WOT you will remain only with those in a future.

Once again if think of your pockets, think of us we pay you salkaries not them.

tdradrian

 

 

 Feeling Good™



Olch #11 Posted 26 October 2015 - 03:44 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 47627 battles
  • 5,316
  • [TRVST] TRVST
  • Member since:
    07-25-2012
At the next Olympics in Rio next year the should also give Gold-medals to everyone. So everyone will be happy, right? :facepalm:

VirtualRJ #12 Posted 26 October 2015 - 03:53 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 19435 battles
  • 8
  • [LOTI] LOTI
  • Member since:
    03-02-2014
Our very young (just a month old) and active clan has 25 members and 9 of us got the reward tank just by individual points. The rest either couldn't make the time or couldn't care less, but they still chipped in to help the ones that wanted it. It shows clan size is not the most important qualifier for earning rewards.

H4NI #13 Posted 26 October 2015 - 04:38 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 41987 battles
  • 2,531
  • [O-S-C] O-S-C
  • Member since:
    10-30-2012

View Posttdradrian, on 25 October 2015 - 08:50 PM, said:

mi mi mi

 

The clan size was never the issue with these rants. It's the skill. Those with the lack of it whine about the "big ones" getting all the free stuff. Well that's how it goes in sports, winners get the rewards. Read this and remember the harsh truth: you will never win anything in clan related stuff until you get better. 



FooWayTheTacoMaster #14 Posted 26 October 2015 - 06:46 PM

    Captain

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 32734 battles
  • 2,425
  • Member since:
    02-16-2013

The only reason to create a competition is that the winner is at least any good (that failed this time :trollface:).

 

So far this is the best event I have ever played. You don't have to fight against your own clan members to get the tank when your target is to win the event. In the past to do the best for the clan may not give you tanks for all your players.

And still you have like 3k 4k free tanks for those who are not top70. Just playing a lot you have the chance to get it. But come on, at least you need to win a few battles. 

 

If you want free tanks just get the 260.



Statpadderer #15 Posted 27 October 2015 - 09:40 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 24901 battles
  • 425
  • [QSF-C] QSF-C
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013


Dr_Zap #16 Posted 28 October 2015 - 08:28 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 57054 battles
  • 1,539
  • [HE-JA] HE-JA
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
I agree with OP. There is clearly something wrong if a clan that only started 4 weeks ago, a clan that had only 7 players interested in trying to get the tank/gold, a clan that played only 8 battles during campaign, still gets 5 tanks. How about making these campaigns a bit more competitive WG, this is a joke. A good joke though since 7K gold for 8 battles is not bad...

Dr__Kiwi #17 Posted 28 October 2015 - 11:24 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 33203 battles
  • 173
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    11-07-2012

View Posttdradrian, on 25 October 2015 - 06:50 PM, said:

Blabla bla, mimimi

tdradrian

 

 

You have 77 players in your clan, we have 21, most of which didn't play in the campaign and didn't care. We played 8 battles in the campaign got -10% for not showing up and still got tanks for most guys that wanted it. What is your excuse other than blaming WG? Git gud and stop blaming haX0rs, WG and what not.



Dr_Zap #18 Posted 28 October 2015 - 11:25 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 57054 battles
  • 1,539
  • [HE-JA] HE-JA
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
Dont forget to tell him we played 5 out of 8 battles with only 8 or 9 players on the team kiwi....

Raffy5 #19 Posted 28 October 2015 - 03:31 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26711 battles
  • 1,977
  • Member since:
    07-09-2012

Well zapper when you threat people with democracy you get the tank no matter what.

GG to the wabbits.

 

LE: and OP is crying but his one of the 3 people in his clan that got the tank. REALLY????


Edited by pussinbootsraffy, 28 October 2015 - 03:34 PM.


JohnnyMaverik #20 Posted 28 October 2015 - 04:11 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 16903 battles
  • 704
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013
Less players got a tonk than in Armageddon, but Armageddon was unusual for the number of players getting a reward. A lot more than just players from the top 70 clans got a reward however, hell I am one of them, we free fell from position 30 something to 110 over the second week, but I turned up a lot, as did some other players and hey, look what we have in our garage. Like TBH they could probably make the rewards harder to get if anything, at the moment if you are at all dedicated to trying to get the tank and your clan is capable of playing a lot and winning a few games, you will get the tank.





Also tagged with campaigns, clanwars, notforeverybody

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users