Jump to content


Tank Customisation


  • Please log in to reply
488 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:07 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 25,000
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
The upcoming update will bring some very interesting changes to ways your tanks can be customised.

Full news text

CoolDannyO #2 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:10 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 27846 battles
  • 39
  • Member since:
    02-08-2014

*
POPULAR

worst. idea. ever.

 

try wasting your time with the damn mm.


Edited by CoolDannyO, 26 October 2015 - 05:10 PM.


ToodlePips #3 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:12 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 55161 battles
  • 389
  • Member since:
    07-11-2012

*
POPULAR

I don't know how other people feel about this, but I am not happy with it. It feels like I am now forced to plaster my tanks - of which I have a lot - with inscriptions to remain competetive, which means that I will have to spend a lot of gold just to preserve the status quo. Wish they hadn't gone through with this.

 

QB's video linked below sums it up pretty nicely, and I completely agree with his criticism.

 

 


Edited by ToodleWrath, 26 October 2015 - 07:12 PM.


McNussBomber #4 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:12 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Clan Commander
  • 53586 battles
  • 3,301
  • [R4INC] R4INC
  • Member since:
    12-24-2010
It would be better if you gave players option to choose which emblem/inscription give which bonus - that would be interesting way, this is more forced way. 

SanyaJuutilainen #5 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:12 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20682 battles
  • 1,875
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011

Nevermind me, just waiting for the inevitable: "I have spent gold on making the tank nice, now I need to spend more gold on making it useful by few percent, sue WG," posts~

 

*noms on popcorn*


Edited by SanyaJuutilainen, 26 October 2015 - 05:12 PM.


Technocrat_Prime #6 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:13 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 30773 battles
  • 3,427
  • [-TCC-] -TCC-
  • Member since:
    11-22-2010
You still don't understand the MM after 15k battles? I would say, l2p, but that would be wasted on one such as you...

GuzganuRozaliu #7 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:14 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32772 battles
  • 1,546
  • Member since:
    07-17-2013

*
POPULAR

Whoa, Whoa! Wait!

Does this mean we're gonna have less coridor maps, less one-sided battles and less frustration due to arty? :ohmy:

 

Or this just some silly way to milk more money out of your customers? :)



they_dinged_us #8 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:14 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15651 battles
  • 5
  • [BPROS] BPROS
  • Member since:
    06-29-2013

*
POPULAR

This game is really becoming pay to win,there is no way  player without premium account can afford all this stuff.Bad move wg very bad

otolino #9 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:16 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11357 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    01-21-2014
I would really consider how this new feature turns the game towards being more pay-to-win...

NoBot4You #10 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:16 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 26167 battles
  • 45
  • Member since:
    01-11-2013

*
POPULAR

Everything that you need to know about this new system!


Edited by NoBot4You, 26 October 2015 - 05:17 PM.


JohnTheNoob #11 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:16 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 16553 battles
  • 38
  • Member since:
    04-02-2013
if players already purchased emblems and inscriptions on tank, will they get compensated, to change it to bonus that is actually useful? or do you expect us to pay for it again?

Edited by JohnTheNoob, 26 October 2015 - 05:17 PM.


Mr_Deo #12 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:16 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39976 battles
  • 1,586
  • [ESAF] ESAF
  • Member since:
    01-30-2012

I must say from what I have seen it is crap...

Endless scrolling to find the one you want/need.

And users who have them now are going to be at a loss when the new ones come out (Unless that's the bonus they want)..

Why not just let the user select ANY bonus they want with something filled in that slot?... At least then we would still have "Customization"



Mr_Deo #13 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:18 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39976 battles
  • 1,586
  • [ESAF] ESAF
  • Member since:
    01-30-2012

View PostJohnTheNoob, on 26 October 2015 - 04:16 PM, said:

if players already purchased emblems and inscriptions on tank, will they get compensated, to change it to bonus that is actually useful? or do you expect us to pay for it again?

 

Pay Again - Guristas....

NoBot4You #14 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:18 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 26167 battles
  • 45
  • Member since:
    01-11-2013

View PostJohnTheNoob, on 26 October 2015 - 04:16 PM, said:

if players already purchased emblems and inscriptions on tank, will they get compensated, to change it to bonus that is actually useful? or do you expect us to pay for it again?

 

Nope doesnt look like it.

rustysprite #15 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:18 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 21768 battles
  • 2,397
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    03-18-2012

Sounds like its closer and closer to Pay to play to me...

 

 

Summing up the bonuses

There can be a maximum of two emblems and two inscriptions on a vehicle. Bonuses from different emblems and inscriptions will stack with each other in the event they give bonuses to the same crew members or the whole crew.

  • Identical bonuses from different inscriptions and emblems stack up
  • An emblem or an inscription that gives a bonus to a specific crew member will work for all crew members with the same role (two loaders in the E 100, for example).
  • If a specific crew member has multiple roles (for example, being a commander and a radio operator at the same time), bonuses are summed up with specific qualifications. For example, for applied inscriptions and emblems there is a bonus +3% to the major qualifications of a commander, +2% to major qualifications of all crew members and +3% to radio operator qualifications. All in all, a commander will get +5% to major qualifications.This number will be displayed on the major qualification level scale. In addition, that crew member's second role, which is Radio Operator, will also get a bonus of +5% to major qualification.


clocky #16 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:20 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19690 battles
  • 697
  • [ONB] ONB
  • Member since:
    10-29-2011

View PostSanyaJuutilainen, on 26 October 2015 - 07:12 PM, said:

Nevermind me, just waiting for the inevitable: "I have spent gold on making the tank nice, now I need to spend more gold on making it useful by few percent, sue WG," posts~

 

*noms on popcorn*

 

And you just had the proper post of a "community contributor" in World of Tanks.

 

Community

Contributor

 

Get it? :))



tapir #17 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:23 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 54355 battles
  • 263
  • Member since:
    07-25-2010


Friderik #18 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:24 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 25833 battles
  • 79
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    09-02-2011

If test servers are ment for TESTING stuff, then dear Wargaming, HEAR, what the players who tested it, say about your idea. We say it is rubbish and unfair and unbeliveably expensive, yet You are forcing us with those "improvements"...

I am disapointed and I am not the only one.



CoolDannyO #19 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:26 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 27846 battles
  • 39
  • Member since:
    02-08-2014
And the sad part is that this discussion is as useless. WG just doesn't care for what we (clients) have to say.

jagdcommander #20 Posted 26 October 2015 - 05:26 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39149 battles
  • 860
  • Member since:
    03-18-2011

Do you really need to make the game more complicated? It should be about gameplay, not deciding where best to spend money for something which in real life would make no difference whatsoever to a tank.

 

Camo is fine - I buy it for tanks where it is useful such as TDs, and camo is something which would clearly give a tank an advantage when hiding, but tying any performance factor to an emblem is ridiculous.

 

I actually support WG in nearly all specials and promotions because you need to make money, but emblems make no sense at all and clearly is going too far in making the game pay-to-win.

 

I tried AW and think WoT is much better, but things like this might make me go back to check a bit more frequently than I otherwise would.

 

 

You really need to do better and think up some reasonable way to make money if this is the best you can do.






2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users