Jump to content


Clan Wars: The Fourth Campaign Incoming


  • Please log in to reply
230 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 11 November 2015 - 03:05 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 24,443
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Times of turmoil are approaching on the Global Map - Get ready for the 4th Campaign: Black Gold!

Full news text

_DynamicGameplay_ #2 Posted 11 November 2015 - 03:11 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 42040 battles
  • 1,305
  • [FORTU] FORTU
  • Member since:
    08-02-2011
Nice, can't wait!! :)

lippel89 #3 Posted 11 November 2015 - 03:25 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 38551 battles
  • 2,691
  • [S4] S4
  • Member since:
    03-20-2013
will this campaign take place in 7vs7, 10vs10 and 15vs15 mode like on the current map?

Decept1on #4 Posted 11 November 2015 - 03:27 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12663 battles
  • 1,358
  • Member since:
    10-27-2010

View Postlippel89, on 11 November 2015 - 03:25 PM, said:

will this campaign take place in 7vs7, 10vs10 and 15vs15 mode like on the current map?

 

Stage 1 T6 7vs7.

Stage 2 T8 10vs10.

Stage 3 T10 15vs15.

 

There will be more details in regulations.



RaeudigerRonny #5 Posted 11 November 2015 - 03:29 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 26091 battles
  • 4,768
  • Member since:
    09-04-2013
Will the stages be 10 days and then 1 day break again?

mightyjosHi #6 Posted 11 November 2015 - 03:29 PM

    Brigadier

  • Clan Commander
  • 32801 battles
  • 4,124
  • [S4] S4
  • Member since:
    06-23-2013
Will Provinces be Landings all the Time and will it be restrcited to 2 Landings/Timezone/Day?

Dr_ownape #7 Posted 11 November 2015 - 03:30 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 40613 battles
  • 5,138
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

wow that came around quick.

 

please though not 10 days for each mode again. make it 8 days with 2 rest days

 

STOP GRINDING and buy back the T37 quick, think thats all i need for the whole event :great:


Edited by brownape, 11 November 2015 - 03:32 PM.


Decept1on #8 Posted 11 November 2015 - 03:32 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12663 battles
  • 1,358
  • Member since:
    10-27-2010

View PostDomstadtkerl, on 11 November 2015 - 03:29 PM, said:

Will the stages be 10 days and then 1 day break again?

 

8 / 10 / 8 with breaks between stages.

 

View PostmightyjosHi, on 11 November 2015 - 03:29 PM, said:

Will Provinces be Landings all the Time and will it be restrcited to 2 Landings/Timezone/Day?

 

No, and yes this a general rule at all times according to my posts during Operation Safari.

Wait for Rules and Regulations and Stage(s) announcement for more info.



Swoopie #9 Posted 11 November 2015 - 03:34 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 27994 battles
  • 2,526
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    01-15-2011

Well that T95E6 doesn't look too inviting if its soft stats haven't changed. Bad accuracy, bad gun control, bad mobility (560hp engine, with bad terrain resistance values) for a T10 med. That thing is miles behind other T10 meds, assuming they haven't done any major changes to soft stats. Well still, another one to add to the collection, and campaigns are usually fun.

 

Edit: But then again Obj907 was pretty much useless, and WG decided to buff it big time right before giving the rewards out so there's still hope.


Edited by Swoopie, 11 November 2015 - 03:43 PM.


Dr_ownape #10 Posted 11 November 2015 - 03:34 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 40613 battles
  • 5,138
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

View PostDecept1on, on 11 November 2015 - 02:32 PM, said:

 

8 / 10 / 8 with breaks between stages.

 

 

Wow you listened, that was quick :teethhappy:



Ulfhedinn_ #11 Posted 11 November 2015 - 03:46 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 48246 battles
  • 7,041
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013

11k reward tanks. So you've not increased the volume at all. Glad I quit CW's.

 

edit - re below, have a negrep, it wasn't whining it was lobbying for a more inclusive fairer deal. And I'm sorry I won't be giving you another opportunity to feel so smug, glad I at least gave you this chance to be snide.

 

edit again, 7 negreps, your in-crowd is strong.


Edited by Maxmk6, 11 November 2015 - 04:42 PM.


RaeudigerRonny #12 Posted 11 November 2015 - 03:47 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 26091 battles
  • 4,768
  • Member since:
    09-04-2013

View PostMaxmk6, on 11 November 2015 - 03:46 PM, said:

11k reward tanks. So you've not increased the volume at all. Glad I quit CW's.

 

Too bad :(

I really enjoyed your whining after last campaign "only for big clans". 



NakedPassenger #13 Posted 11 November 2015 - 04:18 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 32129 battles
  • 579
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-29-2013

View PostMaxmk6, on 11 November 2015 - 02:46 PM, said:

edit - re below, have a negrep, it wasn't whining it was lobbying for a more inclusive fairer deal. And I'm sorry I won't be giving you another opportunity to feel so smug, glad I at least gave you this chance to be snide.

 

The deal is fair. More than the IS-5 deal. And I can't see anyone complaining except for you. You didn't even react on reason on your thread.


Edited by NakedPassenger, 11 November 2015 - 04:23 PM.


Azusa_right_in_the_pusah #14 Posted 11 November 2015 - 04:21 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23616 battles
  • 771
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    02-08-2012
the only sad part for me is that these campaigns fall right in the middle of the exam period ... RIP end resluts

SanyaJuutilainen #15 Posted 11 November 2015 - 04:21 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20649 battles
  • 1,874
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011

View PostMaxmk6, on 11 November 2015 - 03:46 PM, said:

11k reward tanks. So you've not increased the volume at all. Glad I quit CW's.

Maybe because the EU server doesn't have more active people playing CWs. IIRC the campaigns have a given percentage of rewarded players, so if the number of the players doesn't change, hardly you can change the amount of reward tanks.

 

Be realistic here - if you gave out 50k tanks instead of 11k, all the past campaigns would be devalued and the fighting of everyone who had to reach the rank as well. And I say that as someone who tried every time and hasn't reached a reward tank yet. Maybe this time.



nebopd #16 Posted 11 November 2015 - 04:22 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 20393 battles
  • 88
  • Member since:
    05-23-2013

View PostDecept1on, on 11 November 2015 - 02:27 PM, said:

 

Stage 1 T6 7vs7.

Stage 2 T8 10vs10.

Stage 3 T10 15vs15.

 

There will be more details in regulations.

Sorry, but this is ridiculous. It should be 15 vs 15 in all stages, because we need 1 team and not 4 different in different stages of the campaign

Please keep the original format of the campaign.


Edited by nebopd, 11 November 2015 - 04:24 PM.


NakedPassenger #17 Posted 11 November 2015 - 04:24 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 32129 battles
  • 579
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-29-2013
T6 7v7 is kinda mean when you can only play 2 teams per timezone :/

Ulfhedinn_ #18 Posted 11 November 2015 - 04:35 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 48246 battles
  • 7,041
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013

View PostSanyaJuutilainen, on 11 November 2015 - 03:21 PM, said:

Maybe because the EU server doesn't have more active people playing CWs. IIRC the campaigns have a given percentage of rewarded players, so if the number of the players doesn't change, hardly you can change the amount of reward tanks.

 

Be realistic here - if you gave out 50k tanks instead of 11k, all the past campaigns would be devalued and the fighting of everyone who had to reach the rank as well. And I say that as someone who tried every time and hasn't reached a reward tank yet. Maybe this time.

 

Maybe EU doesn't have more people playing CW's because the vast majority of people don't stand any chance of getting anything from it and are just being used to create a stage for others, and cuz EU isn't a peasant society like Russia is, so going without while still putting up, all for the benefit of the ivory tower doesn't appeal. And I've never said anything about 50k tanks, 11k is blue territory, 15k would include a proportion of the greens, would mean there's more than just a tiny handful of tanks going to the usual suspects. But stating these things is a waste of time, it's only any good if WG listen & care but they clearly don't.

Edited by Maxmk6, 11 November 2015 - 04:38 PM.


binmaa10 #19 Posted 11 November 2015 - 04:39 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 29786 battles
  • 4,036
  • [HORAI] HORAI
  • Member since:
    07-19-2013

View PostMaxmk6, on 11 November 2015 - 04:35 PM, said:

 

Maybe EU doesn't have more people playing CW's because the vast majority of people don't stand any chance of getting anything from it and are just being used to create a stage for others, and cuz EU isn't a peasant society like Russia is, so doesn't appeal. And I've never said anything about 50k tanks, 11k is blue territory, 15k would include a proportion of the greens, would mean there's more than just a tiny handful of tanks going to the usual suspects. But stating these things is a waste of time, it's only any good if WG listen & care but they clearly don't.

 

I've seen more than enough yellow/green players driving around with VK7002, Object907 and T23E3. Dont forget the stats of a single player won't win you anything it is still a Clan campaign where you need teamplay to win a prize. Stats are not everything for a Clan event. 

Daijiro074 #20 Posted 11 November 2015 - 04:45 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 34951 battles
  • 130
  • Member since:
    10-29-2013

View PostDecept1on, on 11 November 2015 - 03:32 PM, said:

 

8 / 10 / 8 with breaks between stages.

 

 

No, and yes this a general rule at all times according to my posts during Operation Safari.

Wait for Rules and Regulations and Stage(s) announcement for more info.

It would be nice if battles were conducted a little earlier. It is to exhausting to sit in front of a PC after 22h






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users