Jump to content


Clan Wars: The Fourth Campaign Incoming


  • Please log in to reply
230 replies to this topic

Ulfhedinn_ #41 Posted 11 November 2015 - 08:05 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 48246 battles
  • 7,041
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013

View PostDaijiro074, on 11 November 2015 - 03:47 PM, said:

I have 1480wn8, and i was 144th in the last campaign, so don't talk rubbish

 

Are you seriously trying to say that reward tanks are as available to players in ordinary clans as they are to some others? I really don't care anyway, even if there were 100k reward tanks I wouldn't be interested in CW's with PM's undermining the rest of the game, I just made one short on topic comment about how the tank volume is identical to last time & too limited to make me care that I'm no longer involved.


Edited by Maxmk6, 11 November 2015 - 08:05 PM.


Azusa_right_in_the_pusah #42 Posted 11 November 2015 - 08:12 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 25099 battles
  • 768
  • [EFE-X] EFE-X
  • Member since:
    02-08-2012

View PostMaxmk6, on 11 November 2015 - 07:05 PM, said:

 

Are you seriously trying to say that reward tanks are as available to players in ordinary clans as they are to some others? I really don't care anyway, even if there were 100k reward tanks I wouldn't be interested in CW's with PM's undermining the rest of the game, I just made one short on topic comment about how the tank volume is identical to last time & too limited to make me care that I'm no longer involved.

 

if you aren't interested why care posting here?

edit: you make yourself look like a fool even more (if that's even possible over the internet)


Edited by Azusa_, 11 November 2015 - 08:12 PM.


Joggaman #43 Posted 11 November 2015 - 08:58 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 26436 battles
  • 7,290
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-23-2011


Ulfhedinn_ #44 Posted 11 November 2015 - 09:01 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 48246 battles
  • 7,041
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013
Azusa - Because it was on topic & relevant, it's another manifestation & reminder of, imo, how elitist and unrewarding / inequitable for most WOT's has become over the last year or so & with no sign that will ever get better. I don't see what's foolish about thinking that when it's been my real experience, and why as a paying customer (with last 10 months prem time down the drain due to PM's and still stuck with nearly a month of prem to go) I shouldn't say it.

Edited by Maxmk6, 11 November 2015 - 09:02 PM.


Rois #45 Posted 11 November 2015 - 10:21 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 53273 battles
  • 24
  • [FOCA] FOCA
  • Member since:
    04-28-2011

'' 22:37

  Înfrângere (  DEFEAT ! )
Lupta: Live Oaks
Vehicul: T110E5
Experienţă primită: 63
Credite primite: 6.403
Resurse industriale obţinute: 1 ''

   Server  2 ...

 

  What are the  chances  that ATLEAST 5  guys  from our team  to  have  ammo  rack  hit  IN ONE  GAME  ONLY ? I   had  it  twice  ...

 

    Few    days BEFORE  last  campaign       strange  things  happaned again  :  5  or  6     tracks     in several seconds from  4  +  squares  away  distance  .. in T6  Cromwel ... I  was the  one   '' lucky  '' ...

   Now should i  understand  that  some  clans  are     testing  some  '' features  ''   before  this  new  campaign ???

 

   P.S. Why  not  to be  ALLOWED   in this  new  campaign ONLY those  who  use    '' features  ''   ???  And  those  WITHOUT  '' features ''  to play  for  another  campaign  -  even  for   tier  1  tank !   

   ESL  WIRE ?  WHAT IS THE  PURPOSE  OF THAT ? There are  rewards  in gold  and  ESL WIRE  is  A  MUST !  And  in campaigns where are  T 10 tanks  !  REWARDS  IN     CAMPAIGNS  ARE WAY BETTER but there       you do  not   require  ELS  WIRE ???  WHY ????

 

 

   Should  i  understand   that  you  reward     guys / clans  who use  '' features  '' ???



DosMetros #46 Posted 11 November 2015 - 11:08 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 24080 battles
  • 221
  • Member since:
    12-01-2010

View PostRois, on 11 November 2015 - 09:21 PM, said:

'' 22:37

  Înfrângere (  DEFEAT ! )
Lupta: Live Oaks
Vehicul: T110E5
Experienţă primită: 63
Credite primite: 6.403
Resurse industriale obţinute: 1 ''

   Server  2 ...

 

  What are the  chances  that ATLEAST 5  guys  from our team  to  have  ammo  rack  hit  IN ONE  GAME  ONLY ? I   had  it  twice  ...

 

    Few    days BEFORE  last  campaign       strange  things  happaned again  :  5  or  6     tracks     in several seconds from  4  +  squares  away  distance  .. in T6  Cromwel ... I  was the  one   '' lucky  '' ...

   Now should i  understand  that  some  clans  are     testing  some  '' features  ''   before  this  new  campaign ???

 

   P.S. Why  not  to be  ALLOWED   in this  new  campaign ONLY those  who  use    '' features  ''   ???  And  those  WITHOUT  '' features ''  to play  for  another  campaign  -  even  for   tier  1  tank !   

   ESL  WIRE ?  WHAT IS THE  PURPOSE  OF THAT ? There are  rewards  in gold  and  ESL WIRE  is  A  MUST !  And  in campaigns where are  T 10 tanks  !  REWARDS  IN     CAMPAIGNS  ARE WAY BETTER but there       you do  not   require  ELS  WIRE ???  WHY ????

 

 

   Should  i  understand   that  you  reward     guys / clans  who use  '' features  '' ???

 

[edited]


Edited by Neilloss46, 21 November 2015 - 09:15 PM.
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content. Neilloss46


RaeudigerRonny #47 Posted 11 November 2015 - 11:12 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 28528 battles
  • 4,731
  • Member since:
    09-04-2013

View PostMaxmk6, on 11 November 2015 - 09:01 PM, said:

Azusa - Because it was on topic & relevant, it's another manifestation & reminder of, imo, how elitist and unrewarding / inequitable for most WOT's has become over the last year or so & with no sign that will ever get better. I don't see what's foolish about thinking that when it's been my real experience, and why as a paying customer (with last 10 months prem time down the drain due to PM's and still stuck with nearly a month of prem to go) I shouldn't say it.

 

Or maybe you just suck and dont deserve a reward tank? At some point you will realize its not a participation medal. And WG ijs really nice. They even give out participation medals. But the reward tanks will only be given out to the best 11.000 players.

knightM #48 Posted 12 November 2015 - 12:57 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 51126 battles
  • 1,670
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    02-20-2012

Well the rules have most likely been decided already, but there is one big concern that I have looking at the formats.

 

Most clans (surely top 30 clans in activity) will have about 40 people available on each day on average.

 

For tier 6 this is 5 or 6 teams

Tier 8 4 teams

tier 10 2 teams

 

So I hope the rules for each stage are adjusted taking this into account. 

- if the rules for tier 6 don't allow many fights at same time it will lead to bad atmosphere and some people might loose interest in the campaign

- if the rules allow many fights for tier 10 it will lead to similar complains we had during safari event with people getting burned out and activity having a big impact on the results


Edited by knightM, 12 November 2015 - 12:59 AM.


FooWayTheTacoMaster #49 Posted 12 November 2015 - 01:00 AM

    Captain

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 32851 battles
  • 2,423
  • Member since:
    02-16-2013
One small suggestion because something just got my attention: tier VI (8 days) - tier VIII (10 days) - tier X (8 days). I don't understand this logic (8-10-8 to simplify) at all. What about 6-10-10? 6-8-10? It actually makes more sense...

R1n0_1s_L3g3nd #50 Posted 12 November 2015 - 02:32 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 62629 battles
  • 212
  • Member since:
    04-17-2013

Sorry but 7vs 7 is NOT working for clans.maybe its ok for a small clan.but we have everyday something like 25-30 people outside campaigns.During campaign more than 40 every night.

15 vs 15 is all about it, and thats where our vote goes.So everyone can play.So simple, and as someone said before u dont have dissapointed clan members.

If it goes again 7vs7 in tier 6 it will be nothinelse than 7 light/meds yoloing each other. We need the full set up. Spot-Meds-Heavies-Support TD and SPG. There comes some kind of Strategy. And not only focus fire.

 


Edited by blsbill, 12 November 2015 - 02:33 AM.


Binomaja_ #51 Posted 12 November 2015 - 02:53 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 39286 battles
  • 445
  • [EX-4] EX-4
  • Member since:
    04-13-2012

7vs7 amd 10vs10 is just retarded crap for such a campaign....

and 8-10-8 Days.... adfak make at least 8-8-10 who cares about this lowtier stuff.... everyone is tired of that....



JetCannon3 #52 Posted 12 November 2015 - 04:02 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 24480 battles
  • 239
  • [READ] READ
  • Member since:
    10-05-2011

Fully agree with the comments above. 7vs7 and even 10vs10 is just crap. The less players you have on the field, the more impact RNG has (like one random ammo rack will change everything). If people want to play 7vs7 they can just do some team battles.

Having another American MT would surely be nice, but wasting my time with this CW 2.0 garbage...? Nope.



Iron_Snake #53 Posted 12 November 2015 - 04:24 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 42967 battles
  • 801
  • Member since:
    09-03-2011

View PostUnfa1rPlane, on 11 November 2015 - 04:58 PM, said:

T95E6 and old CW trio as rewards? To be honest I expected a new batch of reward tanks for this campaign (I always thought someone said that previous campaign was the last chance to get M60/Obj/VK). As I own Obj and VK the only choice for me would be M60 and T95. After I compared them I'm shocked. If WG don't buff the E6 fast only people that already have all 3 previous rewards will pick it. It's worse in almost every aspect from M60 - mobility (engine power, power/weight, even soft stats!), firepower (DPM, shell speed, accuracy, aiming time, gun handling), even view-range is worse by 10 meters, armor-wise both are similar (not much of it).

 

So, from those tanks, which one u suggest except T95E6? Thanks

HARK0NEN #54 Posted 12 November 2015 - 07:45 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36553 battles
  • 1,279
  • [BIA] BIA
  • Member since:
    07-20-2011
obj.907, there is no competition at all. vk is junk and m60 is good only in random battles...

kariverson #55 Posted 12 November 2015 - 07:48 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 43715 battles
  • 546
  • [BERIS] BERIS
  • Member since:
    10-10-2012
That was way too fast :(

Alkohool #56 Posted 12 November 2015 - 07:57 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34881 battles
  • 987
  • [BLOJ] BLOJ
  • Member since:
    08-23-2012

View PostIron_Snake, on 12 November 2015 - 03:24 AM, said:

 

So, from those tanks, which one u suggest except T95E6? Thanks

 

Personally I think Object 907 is the best of them now, M60 is basically a M48 Patton which is nor very popular and VK is something like an E100 with different armor layout and slightly worse gun. I would not suggest to pick E6 right now, because it's the worst of them by far.

Statpadderer #57 Posted 12 November 2015 - 08:25 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30464 battles
  • 427
  • [QSF] QSF
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

View PostIron_Snake, on 12 November 2015 - 03:24 AM, said:

 

So, from those tanks, which one u suggest except T95E6? Thanks

 

Whatever you do, don´t pick the M60 - Xensation still has some codes for these left over and is willing to part with them on a "first come , first serve" basis - pm him fast!

TheDrownedApe #58 Posted 12 November 2015 - 09:14 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 55102 battles
  • 6,942
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

View PostStatpadderer, on 12 November 2015 - 07:25 AM, said:

 

Whatever you do, don´t pick the M60 - Xensation still has some codes for these left over and is willing to part with them on a "first come , first serve" basis - pm him fast!

 

:teethhappy:

Finnyan #59 Posted 12 November 2015 - 09:15 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13844 battles
  • 1,354
  • Member since:
    10-27-2010

View PostAlteisen, on 11 November 2015 - 07:39 PM, said:

Top 50 clans, minimum of 5(first campaign was what, 20?) Battles per player, all other unrewarded tanks go to people without the tank as ranked via fame points?

 

Yes like Operation Safari.

 

View PostAzusa_, on 11 November 2015 - 07:48 PM, said:

So top 50 clans get the tank basically for free? like the T23E3 during safari thingy

 

Yep.

 

View PostRois, on 11 November 2015 - 10:21 PM, said:

'' 22:37

  Înfrângere (  DEFEAT ! )
Lupta: Live Oaks
Vehicul: T110E5
Experienţă primită: 63
Credite primite: 6.403
Resurse industriale obţinute: 1 ''

   Server  2 ...

 

  What are the  chances  that ATLEAST 5  guys  from our team  to  have  ammo  rack  hit  IN ONE  GAME  ONLY ? I   had  it  twice  ...

 

    Few    days BEFORE  last  campaign       strange  things  happaned again  :  5  or  6     tracks     in several seconds from  4  +  squares  away  distance  .. in T6  Cromwel ... I  was the  one   '' lucky  '' ...

   Now should i  understand  that  some  clans  are     testing  some  '' features  ''   before  this  new  campaign ???

 

   P.S. Why  not  to be  ALLOWED   in this  new  campaign ONLY those  who  use    '' features  ''   ???  And  those  WITHOUT  '' features ''  to play  for  another  campaign  -  even  for   tier  1  tank !   

   ESL  WIRE ?  WHAT IS THE  PURPOSE  OF THAT ? There are  rewards  in gold  and  ESL WIRE  is  A  MUST !  And  in campaigns where are  T 10 tanks  !  REWARDS  IN     CAMPAIGNS  ARE WAY BETTER but there       you do  not   require  ELS  WIRE ???  WHY ????

 

 

   Should  i  understand   that  you  reward     guys / clans  who use  '' features  '' ???

 

 

View Postfooway, on 12 November 2015 - 01:00 AM, said:

One small suggestion because something just got my attention: tier VI (8 days) - tier VIII (10 days) - tier X (8 days). I don't understand this logic (8-10-8 to simplify) at all. What about 6-10-10? 6-8-10? It actually makes more sense...

 

About your feedback guys:

  • Makes sense about days, I'll give the suggestion.
  • The fact that "7vs7 sucks" for you doesn't mean it's not good for clans with not that many active clan players, it still gives them a chance.

 

Now even if I defend the position of 7vs7 and 10vs10 doesn't mean I won't pass your feedback, because I will :)



BueloProductions #60 Posted 12 November 2015 - 09:41 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35027 battles
  • 631
  • [SERPE] SERPE
  • Member since:
    06-10-2012

View PostRois, on 11 November 2015 - 10:21 PM, said:

'' 22:37

  Înfrângere (  DEFEAT ! )
Lupta: Live Oaks
Vehicul: T110E5
Experienţă primită: 63
Credite primite: 6.403
Resurse industriale obţinute: 1 ''

   Server  2 ...

 

  What are the  chances  that ATLEAST 5  guys  from our team  to  have  ammo  rack  hit  IN ONE  GAME  ONLY ? I   had  it  twice  ...

 

    Few    days BEFORE  last  campaign       strange  things  happaned again  :  5  or  6     tracks     in several seconds from  4  +  squares  away  distance  .. in T6  Cromwel ... I  was the  one   '' lucky  '' ...

   Now should i  understand  that  some  clans  are     testing  some  '' features  ''   before  this  new  campaign ???

 

   P.S. Why  not  to be  ALLOWED   in this  new  campaign ONLY those  who  use    '' features  ''   ???  And  those  WITHOUT  '' features ''  to play  for  another  campaign  -  even  for   tier  1  tank !   

   ESL  WIRE ?  WHAT IS THE  PURPOSE  OF THAT ? There are  rewards  in gold  and  ESL WIRE  is  A  MUST !  And  in campaigns where are  T 10 tanks  !  REWARDS  IN     CAMPAIGNS  ARE WAY BETTER but there       you do  not   require  ELS  WIRE ???  WHY ????

 

 

   Should  i  understand   that  you  reward     guys / clans  who use  '' features  '' ???

Tried with google translator but it crashed, formatted the pc then caught fire ...

 

I suppose he's trying to say: since wg is giving out prizes why don't you use ESL WIRE, the anticheat awful software. So everyone will be forced to play vanilla.

 

Imho ESL WIRE is crap. Period.

It works bad, crashes, freezes and will add lots of frustration and curses to clan chat at the end of the games. True story.

 

Edit:

Forgot to ask.

Is it not possible to expand to 15vs15 in every stage?

 

 


Edited by BueloProductions, 12 November 2015 - 09:47 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users