Jump to content


Rampage: Personal Missions


  • Please log in to reply
72 replies to this topic

IAInon #21 Posted 13 November 2015 - 11:46 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 41243 battles
  • 86
  • Member since:
    07-02-2012
Forget T-22, there's rewards for stages. And that spells at least some really easy money, which can be made before the HOPEFULLY inevitable Christmas sales next month. Perfect timing.

jagdcommander #22 Posted 14 November 2015 - 01:19 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 40430 battles
  • 860
  • Member since:
    03-18-2011

View PostIAInon, on 13 November 2015 - 11:46 PM, said:

Forget T-22, there's rewards for stages. And that spells at least some really easy money, which can be made before the HOPEFULLY inevitable Christmas sales next month. Perfect timing.

 

 

Can something be "hopefully inevitable"? ;-)



IAInon #23 Posted 14 November 2015 - 02:05 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 41243 battles
  • 86
  • Member since:
    07-02-2012

View Postjagdcommander, on 14 November 2015 - 01:19 AM, said:

 

 

Can something be "hopefully inevitable"? ;-)

 

You wouldn't think so but then look at the shitty events leading up to the armistice day. For all it seemed, it was inevitable that they were saving all their power for something amazing to do on it. And then the reality happened. It was the last straw. All things which SHOULD be "inevitable" simply have to now be downgraded with the "hopefully".



Iron_Snake #24 Posted 14 November 2015 - 02:19 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 40074 battles
  • 798
  • [QSF] QSF
  • Member since:
    09-03-2011
My max was 12k and I practically owned the whole bunch of noobs but 15k...with experienced players...even bigger issue...

Captain_Strawberry #25 Posted 14 November 2015 - 02:27 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 18758 battles
  • 164
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011

Give me a button that skips all the crap I don't care about, gives me the crewmembers and I'll press it.



higurush #26 Posted 14 November 2015 - 03:13 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16816 battles
  • 128
  • Member since:
    01-08-2012

priorities...priorities.. KHM...
http://9gag.com/gag/aNKXPX3

 

btw ty for the easy credits.



clocky #27 Posted 14 November 2015 - 08:57 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19693 battles
  • 698
  • [ONB] ONB
  • Member since:
    10-29-2011

View PostHadurHun, on 13 November 2015 - 10:44 PM, said:

F#$% rampage, bring back national battles!
and do an in game bonus for platoons of same nation or even same vehicles!

 

Soviet developers don't like when their beloved T34 is getting raped by Tiger I

Cayman #28 Posted 14 November 2015 - 11:50 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 14261 battles
  • 103
  • [NOWAI] NOWAI
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011

Another useless mode and op tank as a reward to pomp up fake popularity and numbers. Instead of prioritizing the most important things such as new engine/physics, artillery rework and multi-core usage, matchmaking rework they made some useless stuff that will be forgotten like team battles/historical battles/campaign battles (or w/e is the name).

Oh and let's not forget, as a reward we will get ANOTHER BUT YET THE SAME russian op tank.


Edited by Cayman, 14 November 2015 - 11:53 AM.


jugilismaani #29 Posted 14 November 2015 - 12:07 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22409 battles
  • 1,126
  • [SPIKE] SPIKE
  • Member since:
    04-29-2014
Am I just blind and they are already in the game, if I am not when are they supposed to come? That announcement makes it sound like they are live already

EDIT: never mind I am blind "Important: Please be aware that all information about this feature provided in the article is subject to change and may be amended, supplemented, or even discarded completely upon the official release. "

Edited by jugilismaani, 14 November 2015 - 12:08 PM.


Tarantula_xD #30 Posted 14 November 2015 - 01:01 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 19323 battles
  • 1,060
  • [MSGA] MSGA
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011
I got that damage mission done on both karelia and mines, in leopard 1 and russian mediums

Ulfhedinn_ #31 Posted 14 November 2015 - 01:07 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 48246 battles
  • 7,041
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013

So female crew with Sisterhood of Steel as a free perk, again zero rated so they permanently train faster than ordinary crew, are staying as a reward for Personal Missions? You're going to continue wrecking the games crew economy & so wrecking any notion of the game having a level playing field. Just shove it WG.

 

edit - exactly what was the point of me buying 2 and a half years premium account, tons of premium tanks, playing over 31k games all as daily doubles, all to get best possible crew, for you to then effectively downgrade and devalue my crew & my investment in them by introducing superior permanently faster training crew that I don't have equal access to (cuz I'm not a tooner or camper or arty player and was never obliged to be before)? And what's the point of me having had premium account from Jan through to now (or going forward premium account again) which was purely to optimise crew training, when I don't have a fair share of these superior / optimum crews to train? I guess just so you could rip me off. WG you are just crooks, you've ruined this game with this PM superior reward crew sh*t, I couldn't respect or regard the Devs that did this or the Management that support it less, just contemptible.

Edited by Maxmk6, 14 November 2015 - 04:32 PM.


Mr_Pal #32 Posted 14 November 2015 - 01:32 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 4947 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    02-15-2015
is it only for tier 10?

radianter #33 Posted 14 November 2015 - 02:16 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 5628 battles
  • 309
  • Member since:
    05-10-2013

View PostMr_Pal, on 14 November 2015 - 01:32 PM, said:

is it only for tier 10?

 

You must select at least 1 tier 10, and the other two from 8 to 10.

Horatio__Caine #34 Posted 14 November 2015 - 02:24 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 27298 battles
  • 4,430
  • [SA-AS] SA-AS
  • Member since:
    05-11-2012
if you ignore 15th missions, all missions are ok but 15k dmg? :facepalm:

Eaglax #35 Posted 14 November 2015 - 03:50 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 19145 battles
  • 3,520
  • Member since:
    01-12-2012

And again stupid platoon requirements.....can you guys actually think 2 seconds before introducing new stuff????

the platoon requirements from the "old" missions get changed, because no one like them........and now you bring the back, seriously wtf do you expect to happen?



Speed_Of_Pain #36 Posted 14 November 2015 - 04:49 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6157 battles
  • 200
  • [READ] READ
  • Member since:
    03-04-2012

View PostPinkFloyd1965, on 13 November 2015 - 12:22 PM, said:

 

Con - Really good people will get it, and they are Op in most tanks, in this one will be just insane

 

Just like with Obj 260, PLENTY of greens and yellows will get it just because luck. They try to make missions hard and "skill dependent", but unless mission requires high avg damage for say 10-20 battles, it can be done even by bot if he's lucky enough. Funny that I mention that, because you can find stories of people completing HT, TD and MT missions for stug with bot from 1 to 15 (there are no bots in game though, it's just something WG haters made up) 

One battle is just pure luck. All personal missions suffer from that, not just T22.

 

1/10, but since I like that mode I'll still play it and give these missions a try at least for the silver you get from them.



Skarakien #37 Posted 14 November 2015 - 05:11 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 29554 battles
  • 16
  • [HUNKP] HUNKP
  • Member since:
    07-27-2011
Will this mean that we won't be able to do the "first wave" personal missions anymore?

pudelikael #38 Posted 14 November 2015 - 06:03 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20747 battles
  • 654
  • Member since:
    05-15-2015
[edited] news again

Edited by Neilloss46, 16 November 2015 - 07:56 PM.
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content. Neilloss46


FatigueGalaxy #39 Posted 14 November 2015 - 06:35 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 19521 battles
  • 2,140
  • [SPIKE] SPIKE
  • Member since:
    02-09-2011

View PostDocPurple, on 14 November 2015 - 03:50 PM, said:

And again stupid platoon requirements.....can you guys actually think 2 seconds before introducing new stuff????

the platoon requirements from the "old" missions get changed, because no one like them........and now you bring the back, seriously wtf do you expect to happen?

 

But one of these Rampage modes is platoons vs platoons IIRC so it's understandable that there are platoon missions. Just don't play it if you don't like it. It's like moaning about ranked team battle missions you can't do because you don't have a team or CW reward tanks you can't get because they require a clan... It's not a random battle where playing solo or in platoon is your own choice and preference. 1/3 of Rampage mode is reserved for platoons by default.

Alabamatick #40 Posted 14 November 2015 - 06:52 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 31849 battles
  • 3,115
  • Member since:
    04-11-2011

View PostKLguns, on 13 November 2015 - 06:37 PM, said:

NO THANKS, not worth the time.

 

Yeah, if i wanted to play a deathmatch mode, i'd come back and play randoms again :sceptic:, (or COD, as it's the same thing now)




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users