Jump to content


CW tank amount


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

Higero #1 Posted 27 November 2015 - 09:56 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23747 battles
  • 284
  • [-FU-] -FU-
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011
Well, actually we play a lot at tier six and i would like to see more tanks on the field. It would make game more nice, you could see where the tanks are going and you could plan game more efficient. i actually hate this new setup of tanks. 15 vs. 15 would be optimal (as it used to be), now you can take one flank and play it and thats it. If you fail it and other one caps, you fail and you can't do nothing. You see a lot of camping at the tier six and you'll have to play with it. K' we are semi clan, but would be happy, if we could see this.

Higero #2 Posted 27 November 2015 - 09:57 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23747 battles
  • 284
  • [-FU-] -FU-
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011
and let the neg reps fall on me :D

Flaficasti_Oblacic #3 Posted 27 November 2015 - 11:37 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14832 battles
  • 673
  • Member since:
    04-05-2013

T6 CW now is horrid just because there is too much RNG involved.

15:15 would be nice but, 15 OI's camping in base is just wrong and scary :teethhappy:



Trac_uses_hax #4 Posted 27 November 2015 - 11:38 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20513 battles
  • 1,562
  • Member since:
    10-30-2011
No man. I agree. I wanna play 15v15 on 6,8,10. Gives much more variety to the tactics and tank choices.  

Athanati_Este #5 Posted 28 November 2015 - 12:59 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 40404 battles
  • 717
  • [K4E] K4E
  • Member since:
    04-13-2012

7v7 is fine for some maps, for some its trash. Imagine Ensk or Widepark 15v15.

 

 



Swoopie #6 Posted 28 November 2015 - 04:05 AM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 28355 battles
  • 2,529
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    01-15-2011

View Postdarkomsq, on 28 November 2015 - 01:59 AM, said:

7v7 is fine for some maps, for some its trash. Imagine Ensk or Widepark 15v15.

 

 

 

Have fun breaking that Widepark 15 O-I camp :teethhappy:

 

But yeah, imo 15vs15>>>>>>>>>7vs7. 10vs10 is already borderline, they should've done it so that T6 is like 9vs9, T8 12vs12 and T10 15 vs15. Or just 15vs15 all the way for all tiers. With only 7 T6's, the games are way too often decided with RNG, as that single shot you bounced might be fatal. With larger amount of players, the effect of RNG on battle results is much smaller and also the tactics would be more diverse.


Edited by Swoopie, 28 November 2015 - 04:07 AM.


sartox1 #7 Posted 28 November 2015 - 11:03 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 35622 battles
  • 1,794
  • Member since:
    04-14-2012
IMO, we need 10vs10 games. 15vs15 is too much 

Athanati_Este #8 Posted 28 November 2015 - 02:55 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 40404 battles
  • 717
  • [K4E] K4E
  • Member since:
    04-13-2012

View Postsartox1, on 28 November 2015 - 10:03 AM, said:

IMO, we need 10vs10 games. 15vs15 is too much 

 

we'll have them in few days anyway hermano




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users