Jump to content


T-22sr Mission Rigging


  • Please log in to reply
1123 replies to this topic

king_of_tankers #1101 Posted 18 April 2016 - 01:04 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 12431 battles
  • 17
  • Member since:
    07-29-2013
I just try to finish my misions,  i finish 4 mision.... I play eu2 and all time only 22 players so i play whith them all time .....

b0d #1102 Posted 19 April 2016 - 01:41 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 20056 battles
  • 3,909
  • Member since:
    05-22-2015

View PostSiegemaster, on 21 December 2015 - 12:12 PM, said:

Hello, I am one of the players who got banned for the ''mission rigging''...I want to know, how is it possible that you banned over 100 people with no evidence at all? For example, I didn't get banned for rigging or anything similar at all, and now you're   just asuming  that I have done the missions by rigging them? I must say, without evidence you can't do that, There is not right of doing that, this isn't  the 16th century where you can just do what ever you want because you're the ''king''....I want you to show  clear evidence of the people who got banned, and with clear evidences I mean replays. 

 

You are "borrowing" the property of WG.  You have no rights other than those outlined in the service agreement, which you have agreed to.  Try taking them to court over it if you like and let us know how you get on.



mygary #1103 Posted 20 April 2016 - 06:42 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 43749 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    11-13-2011
wargaming gift ? give to all the t22 nex time do better. ciao

Bad_at_Breaking #1104 Posted 15 May 2016 - 03:15 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 49546 battles
  • 1
  • [_SHC_] _SHC_
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012
This doesn't mean you can take the chance for everyone else to earn the t22 away. Give the tank to everyone or take it away from everyone.  And who ever thumb sucked that 100 player ban figure is stupid. it would have been more than 100 players that cheated. This is a match making problem that can be fixed but you prefer to take it away and only let the frauds keep the tank. Typical WG move. I bet half the frauds are WG staff.  Now all you have to do to fix the fraud is fix your match making so that clans cant count in and if players are/were in the same clan they cant be on the same battle field. Problem solved no need to take it away.

Red_Ensign #1105 Posted 15 May 2016 - 04:36 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 400 battles
  • 71
  • Member since:
    05-27-2013

for those who don't know, on the NA servers the people caught rigging got to keep the tank and only got a few days' timeout, which is a complete joke.

 

you may not think WGEU handled this right, but they did a hell of a lot better than WGNA.  which is why I'm now here spending my money.


Edited by Red_Ensign, 15 May 2016 - 04:37 AM.


The_Trinityx90 #1106 Posted 15 May 2016 - 08:13 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 50 battles
  • 147
  • Member since:
    05-11-2016

View PostRed_Ensign, on 15 May 2016 - 04:36 AM, said:

for those who don't know, on the NA servers the people caught rigging got to keep the tank and only got a few days' timeout, which is a complete joke.

 

you may not think WGEU handled this right, but they did a hell of a lot better than WGNA.  which is why I'm now here spending my money.

 

And we europeans spend our money on your servers because of the ridiculously better offers and specials :teethhappy:

Llewelyn #1107 Posted 15 May 2016 - 09:10 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 11010 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

56 pages?  really?

 

One constant theme appears to be that WG is in some way not able to act in any way it sees fit, in respect of its game published on servers that it controls.  If you come and play in their yard you play by their rules, and they can change said rules whenever they want.  Don't like it?  vote with your feet, go play some other game...

 

it's a little like the way people (Amercians, mostly) scream about free speech when they get banned by mods for breaking chat rules.  Game chat and forums and such like are NOT public places, they are run by the company that owns them, which can make whatever rules it likes (subject to not actually breaking any laws) - certainly, they can make and enforce rules about who may say what. 



PaganWatcher #1108 Posted 16 May 2016 - 05:18 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16433 battles
  • 139
  • [-TTK-] -TTK-
  • Member since:
    12-29-2014
The other day playing Wot - random - noticed T 22 med.... man with 300 WN8 - really? he got it himself.... i must have screen shot somewhere

Jesterix_ #1109 Posted 16 May 2016 - 05:42 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12968 battles
  • 357
  • [CURS] CURS
  • Member since:
    10-22-2011

View PostPaganWatcher, on 16 May 2016 - 05:18 PM, said:

The other day playing Wot - random - noticed T 22 med.... man with 300 WN8 - really? he got it himself.... i must have screen shot somewhere

 

Betcha Don't ! 

PaganWatcher #1110 Posted 17 May 2016 - 11:47 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16433 battles
  • 139
  • [-TTK-] -TTK-
  • Member since:
    12-29-2014

View PostJesterix_, on 16 May 2016 - 05:42 PM, said:

 

Betcha Don't ! 

 

Want a bet on 1000 gold?

The_Trinityx90 #1111 Posted 17 May 2016 - 02:53 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 50 battles
  • 147
  • Member since:
    05-11-2016

View PostPaganWatcher, on 16 May 2016 - 05:18 PM, said:

The other day playing Wot - random - noticed T 22 med.... man with 300 WN8 - really? he got it himself.... i must have screen shot somewhere

 

Did you asked him for replays?

 

I bet 5k Gold on "replay function not active, don´t have that space on SSD"

 

Wargaming:

"Everything got proofed"



novacoocey #1112 Posted 29 May 2016 - 01:14 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15826 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    01-08-2013

If Got a Player wich defently rigged, his ingame name is

 

: Its_My_Fault



PaganWatcher #1113 Posted 02 June 2016 - 12:39 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16433 battles
  • 139
  • [-TTK-] -TTK-
  • Member since:
    12-29-2014

I would suggest WG put in Game client - every single time somebody accomplishes  any personal mission - the replay should be saved and auto sent down to cloud server for WG - that they could have a valid proof how it was done. 

and there will be no problems at all.



Ober__ #1114 Posted 02 June 2016 - 08:00 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 52449 battles
  • 746
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    09-01-2014
missions was gone almost week ago, but still trolling about nothing :)

PaganWatcher #1115 Posted 03 June 2016 - 12:16 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16433 battles
  • 139
  • [-TTK-] -TTK-
  • Member since:
    12-29-2014

View PostOberfuhr, on 02 June 2016 - 08:00 PM, said:

missions was gone almost week ago, but still trolling about nothing :)

 

not only about T 22 med... - what about Obj 260 mission rig???

Sijuks46 #1116 Posted 06 June 2016 - 06:46 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 35923 battles
  • 4
  • Member since:
    07-09-2013

View PostSiegemaster, on 21 December 2015 - 12:12 PM, said:

Hello, I am one of the players who got banned for the ''mission rigging''...I want to know, how is it possible that you banned over 100 people with no evidence at all? For example, I didn't get banned for rigging or anything similar at all, and now you're   just asuming  that I have done the missions by rigging them? I must say, without evidence you can't do that, There is not right of doing that, this isn't  the 16th century where you can just do what ever you want because you're the ''king''....I want you to show  clear evidence of the people who got banned, and with clear evidences I mean replays. 

 

I am also banned without proof behave like the Spanish Inquisition !!! do not have a brain, and immediately there is no logic !!!

Balego #1117 Posted 06 June 2016 - 08:18 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 8867 battles
  • 8
  • Member since:
    07-19-2013
Hi

Sijuks46 #1118 Posted 08 June 2016 - 10:24 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 35923 battles
  • 4
  • Member since:
    07-09-2013

View PostRolliger_Ruediger, on 21 December 2015 - 12:14 PM, said:

 

nah they didnt. know a guy who played 56 games in randoms with t-22 and not banned, but he rigged.

 

 

can I request t see the evidence?

 

 

i know 200-250 players they rigged tank and dont get ban!!!say they are behaving the same way every player!!!!funny



DurtiArry #1119 Posted 08 June 2016 - 10:38 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 57929 battles
  • 280
  • [ANG3L] ANG3L
  • Member since:
    11-27-2012

View PostSijuks46, on 08 June 2016 - 09:24 AM, said:

i know 200-250 players they rigged tank and dont get ban!!!say they are behaving the same way every player!!!!funny

 

Are you claiming you didn't rig matches to gain the T-22, and you are disputing the ban you currently have?

Otherwise what is the point of your post? To advise you 'know' up to 250 other people that have rigged matches?

 



mygary #1120 Posted 29 October 2016 - 12:56 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 43749 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    11-13-2011
tanks for banned me now bann all  same history ciao




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users