Jump to content


New Global Map idea - pls comment


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

roastedlemon #1 Posted 26 February 2016 - 10:02 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20057 battles
  • 675
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

So i am sure its a well known discussion about the tier system for the new map, currently it's tier 10, tier 8 and tier 6, with gold income balanced accordingly for the tier u play. But, here is my idea, why not make every stage tier 10, but keep it 7v7 for one stage, 10v10 for another stage, and the current 15v15 stage stays the same. The gold income wouldn't need to be changed and nor would the format, all that changes would be the tier system would all be tier 10.

 

Feedback would be appreciated. 

 

 

Regards,

RL



Griva #2 Posted 27 February 2016 - 08:20 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Commander
  • 32314 battles
  • 708
  • Member since:
    03-24-2011

Wargaming created this map (VI and VIII) for very weak clans and clans who like these tiers. This system give possibility of playing for weak clans, so WG will not change it... "Your idea is flawed" :D  (for wargaming)

For me is very fine - as long as we play at X tier - every idea is perfect :)

 

BTW Gold income must change. Its not balanced that 15 players team can earn the same amount of gold as 7 players team.



roastedlemon #3 Posted 27 February 2016 - 09:00 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20057 battles
  • 675
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

nice reference :D

 

But the gold income currently for tier 10 is much higher per province than it is for tier 6...



Griva #4 Posted 28 February 2016 - 12:37 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Commander
  • 32314 battles
  • 708
  • Member since:
    03-24-2011

Aww sorry i misunderstood you, i thought about only X tiers income, you mean whole map. Yes, if 6 tier is converted to 7v7 X tier battle, the same gold, its ok.

I think 15v15 is cooler, more tactic etc, but 7v7 at X tier is better than VI for me...

 

I still have another one idea about penalty system, but maybe next time :D

I will happy too if you add solution/comment of my problem in income rebalance topic, but this one isn't bad - anyway better that what is now...



roastedlemon #5 Posted 28 February 2016 - 01:59 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20057 battles
  • 675
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

Yes 15vs15 is better, but the tier 10 7v7 and 10v10 would still keep to WG's idea that smaller clans can compete whilst still pleasing the players that grind all the tier 10 tanks. This would benefit future campaigns if all regular CW was tier 10, because then you will get to play tier 8 and tier 6 cw only for a couple of weeks max, which is enough to not get tiring. Maybe they could even use the old tank company style tier points for regular CW or something? But the penalty system is wrong anyway imo and should not have been implemented in its current form (prevents delays for clans on map and makes clans scared of moving in case of not being able to field enough teams and then receive a penalty). 

 

RL

 

Edit: and about the gold income topic... i completely forgot about it :P will reply tomorrow when i have slept.


Edited by roastedlemon, 28 February 2016 - 02:00 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users