Jump to content


leKpz M41 90 GF - Camouflage rating

m41 90 GF camo rating camouflage

  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

Kloster #1 Posted 05 April 2016 - 01:42 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 20209 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    06-09-2011

Quick qustion about the leKpz M41 90 GF.

What is the camouflage rating on this tank?



Eila_Juutilainen #2 Posted 06 April 2016 - 08:26 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 21383 battles
  • 3,883
  • [102ND] 102ND
  • Member since:
    11-04-2012

View PostKloster, on 05 April 2016 - 01:42 PM, said:

Quick qustion about the leKpz M41 90 GF.

What is the camouflage rating on this tank?

 

Probably the same as standard M41 Walker Bulldog with camo paint (the WG skin counts as camo paint)

lafeel #3 Posted 06 April 2016 - 07:41 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 4964 battles
  • 1,505
  • [LAFIE] LAFIE
  • Member since:
    03-13-2011

View PostEila_Juutilainen, on 06 April 2016 - 07:26 AM, said:

 

Probably the same as standard M41 Walker Bulldog with camo paint (the WG skin counts as camo paint)

 

Which isn't all that great for a LT, it should be noted.



Eila_Juutilainen #4 Posted 07 April 2016 - 08:09 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 21383 battles
  • 3,883
  • [102ND] 102ND
  • Member since:
    11-04-2012

View Postlafeel, on 06 April 2016 - 07:41 PM, said:

 

Which isn't all that great for a LT, it should be noted.

 

It's pretty much one of the worst. Actually, without AFK Panther it should be tied for the worst with T71.

 

The camo rating of a M41 WB is just over 14% stationary/moving, BTW. Add a flat 3% for the camo paint, so 17% total should be it.


Edited by Eila_Juutilainen, 07 April 2016 - 08:10 AM.


Cobra6 #5 Posted 09 April 2016 - 08:25 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16505 battles
  • 17,033
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

View Postlafeel, on 06 April 2016 - 06:41 PM, said:

 

Which isn't all that great for a LT, it should be noted.

 

But still better than the T-54 Lwt. by miles it seems :D

 

Cobra 6



superfly2000 #6 Posted 09 April 2016 - 09:30 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 80025 battles
  • 1,617
  • [SFLY] SFLY
  • Member since:
    12-25-2011
Personally, while driving it I have discovered that it might be greatly worse then even the bulldog and the T49....why I am not sure....I am hoping that it is a bug that they need to iron out....

anonym_kUQyj0XwjEe2 #7 Posted 12 April 2016 - 07:44 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 144
  • Member since:
    03-29-2019
Have thought about buying this but can you change the camo. The prospect of driving around in a mobile sandwich board/billboard advertising WG/WOT is very uncool.

Eila_Juutilainen #8 Posted 13 April 2016 - 01:59 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 21383 battles
  • 3,883
  • [102ND] 102ND
  • Member since:
    11-04-2012

View PostBlG_J0E, on 12 April 2016 - 07:44 PM, said:

Have thought about buying this but can you change the camo. The prospect of driving around in a mobile sandwich board/billboard advertising WG/WOT is very uncool.

 

Camo cannot be changed, just like the AMX 13 57.

superfly2000 #9 Posted 13 April 2016 - 02:21 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 80025 battles
  • 1,617
  • [SFLY] SFLY
  • Member since:
    12-25-2011

This thread is about the camouflage RATING!

 

If you want to discuss the camouflage paint job then MAKE YOUR OWN THREAD!


Edited by superfly2000, 13 April 2016 - 02:21 PM.


SharpBlue #10 Posted 14 April 2016 - 12:37 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 60855 battles
  • 252
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    09-03-2011
I'd really like to know the actual cammo rating.  It "feels" really bad, just want to make sure it's not broken.

superfly2000 #11 Posted 14 April 2016 - 01:07 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 80025 battles
  • 1,617
  • [SFLY] SFLY
  • Member since:
    12-25-2011
Exactly....

brisha #12 Posted 18 April 2016 - 07:07 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17083 battles
  • 1,535
  • Member since:
    10-11-2012

View PostSharpBlue, on 14 April 2016 - 12:37 PM, said:

I'd really like to know the actual cammo rating.  It "feels" really bad, just want to make sure it's not broken.

 

It must be broken, so far no sixth sense or any skills (Sixth is 99% so one more battle), sitting in a bush well back and I get shot, happens all the time, it seems it gets spotted from the moon. I get spotted and clobbered in places that just shouldn't happen, I know I don't have any camo skill yet but it does seem way worse than most of my mediums.

 

I thought it was just me being unlucky but it seems I am not alone, and when you get hit by a T10 it's often a 1 shot, TD's and arty have embarrassingly got me a few times. I know I should keep on the move but I can honestly say that the places where I have been spotted has taken ne by surprise. The T54lt seems way better.



fancortez #13 Posted 18 April 2016 - 10:57 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 18016 battles
  • 8
  • Member since:
    02-12-2013
I'm very suspicious as well. I don't think the black camo is working properly.
I play the t71 a lot, which has the same camo-values listed.
Of course the Bulldog is taller, but still - I get spotted WAY earlier.

Thundyuk #14 Posted 22 April 2016 - 07:14 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14644 battles
  • 1,121
  • [1ETR] 1ETR
  • Member since:
    08-20-2011
Not worth it then?

evilsamar #15 Posted 25 April 2016 - 10:55 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 13703 battles
  • 121
  • [CRYA] CRYA
  • Member since:
    09-26-2012
I think it has the same camo rating  as an ELC...attached to a Maus on top of a Type 5...driving around in circles on the deck of a Montana-class battleship...camouflaged in a large camo net made of colorful, brightly flashing xmass lights...

Edited by evilsamar, 25 April 2016 - 10:57 PM.


Jinqx #16 Posted 26 April 2016 - 09:57 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 38076 battles
  • 821
  • Member since:
    09-07-2010
The gut feeling is that the camovalue is broken on this tonk, i get spotted constantly despite a 100% camo crew, yeah it has pretty bad camo stats on paper to but it feels like running around in a firetruck with all the bells and wissles goin...........

Jimbodiah #17 Posted 27 April 2016 - 01:26 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 11096 battles
  • 2,209
  • Member since:
    04-28-2015

View Postevilsamar, on 25 April 2016 - 10:55 PM, said:

I think it has the same camo rating  as an ELC...attached to a Maus on top of a Type 5...driving around in circles on the deck of a Montana-class battleship...camouflaged in a large camo net made of colorful, brightly flashing xmass lights...

 

So pretty much something like this:

 



SharpBlue #18 Posted 29 April 2016 - 03:53 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 60855 battles
  • 252
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    09-03-2011
On the 9.15 test server it's only slightly worse than the 13 90, so hopefully it's been fixed.

XPuntar #19 Posted 30 April 2016 - 10:10 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14510 battles
  • 1,959
  • Member since:
    08-19-2012

Nobody tried the camo on this tank via training room?

 

There is / was a thread somewhere about it when tank get spotted with zero and with full camo value on crew. It was tried with nearly all tanks If I am correct.



Manicgin #20 Posted 02 May 2016 - 08:22 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 21098 battles
  • 35
  • [FOOL] FOOL
  • Member since:
    01-04-2016

I feel I can hide a tiger 1 easier than this thing.

The paint job should not be matt black but Day-Glo pink to illustrate it's effectiveness.

 

 

Panzer mutz is much better in every department for spotting and it's a medium.







Also tagged with m41, 90, GF, camo, rating, camouflage

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users