Jump to content


leKpz M41 90 GF - Camouflage rating

m41 90 GF camo rating camouflage

  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

MauDaFaca #21 Posted 04 May 2016 - 11:14 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 28639 battles
  • 6
  • [POR-1] POR-1
  • Member since:
    08-08-2011

the camouflage values are all upside down for most od the tanks. I. E. BIG tanks having better camo ratings then smaller ones, or T29's disapearing in front of you without a single obstacle between the line of sight at less then 50 metres.

But relatively to this tank... I have the quickybaby mod and camo value is quote ?/?/? unquote. All other tanks have values (even 0/0/0), which leeds me to another question:

What is the rating of X % better over 0 or "?" ?

Because for me, 10 % better  then zero is zero; not to mention the value of "?".

Every new "premium" tank is becomming more like a scamm.



GrayDwarf #22 Posted 24 August 2016 - 07:53 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 30071 battles
  • 25
  • [12-R] 12-R
  • Member since:
    04-30-2015

View PostMauDaFaca, on 04 May 2016 - 11:14 PM, said:

What is the rating of X % better over 0 or "?" ?

Because for me, 10 % better  then zero is zero; not to mention the value of ?

The camo value negates part of the view range of a spotting tank. If you are sitting in a tank with 25% camo, a tank with 400 m view range will spot you at 300 m, I.e. your camo reduces his effective view range by 25%.



pudelikael #23 Posted 25 August 2016 - 04:06 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23610 battles
  • 738
  • Member since:
    05-15-2015
wasted money, super  SH IT tank

Meska01 #24 Posted 30 August 2016 - 10:35 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5103 battles
  • 1
  • [FEL] FEL
  • Member since:
    11-12-2015
one of TOP 3 prem tanks for me

Lomion_EU #25 Posted 30 August 2016 - 12:23 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38394 battles
  • 607
  • [CSW] CSW
  • Member since:
    08-30-2012

View Postevilsamar, on 25 April 2016 - 09:55 PM, said:

I think it has the same camo rating  as an ELC...attached to a Maus on top of a Type 5...driving around in circles on the deck of a Montana-class battleship...camouflaged in a large camo net made of colorful, brightly flashing xmass lights...

 

​You forgot the techno music blaring from huge speakers mounted on the roof



Gremlin182 #26 Posted 30 August 2016 - 01:04 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 54823 battles
  • 9,073
  • Member since:
    04-18-2012

I put it as a little worse than the M41 Walker Bulldog.

 

I have both these tanks but the crews have different skill levels so removed the crews.

Game reports the walker bulldogs concealment rating as 287 and if I add camo it says 347 .

The Premium M41-90 GF says 320

 


Edited by Gremlin182, 30 August 2016 - 01:05 PM.


pudelikael #27 Posted 31 August 2016 - 09:16 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23610 battles
  • 738
  • Member since:
    05-15-2015
trash tank, why i buy crapWG premium tanks, why????????

BKatt #28 Posted 01 October 2016 - 01:32 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 36789 battles
  • 590
  • Member since:
    04-28-2013
For a tier 8 scout, the camovalue is indeed REALLY bad. I do hope WG will buff it a tad.

Codis172 #29 Posted 28 October 2016 - 11:14 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 33813 battles
  • 399
  • Member since:
    11-10-2014
Buff the mm, make teams more equal. My team gets butchered most of the time, hence my WR in this thing is low. Doing what this tank needs to be doing but yeah, it doesn't influence end result. No excuse, it's truth.

DonZivconi #30 Posted 14 January 2018 - 07:18 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 38944 battles
  • 36
  • [ZADAR] ZADAR
  • Member since:
    05-12-2012
this is one of worst LT speaking of cammo 





Also tagged with m41, 90, GF, camo, rating, camouflage

2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users