Jump to content


Operation Typhoon rule 2.3.


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

FidelisRaven #1 Posted 18 April 2016 - 04:59 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 39563 battles
  • 560
  • [WHO] WHO
  • Member since:
    05-23-2012
2.3. Landing provinces will randomly migrate within the map after each Prime Time. If a clan already owns a province on the Global Map, they can land again.

Why did this change? In the first version of the rules, it said "
 Landing provinces will randomly migrate within the map after each Prime Time. If a clan already owns a province on the Global Map, they CANNOT land again."

Why does it matter? It matters because clans spam landings over and over again instead of fighting on the map, so your chances to meet top 10 clans  in the first round of most landing tournaments day after day rise dramatically. So yea, g-friggin-g. 

RaeudigerRonny #2 Posted 18 April 2016 - 05:20 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 26495 battles
  • 4,744
  • Member since:
    09-04-2013
Because WG learned nothing compared to the last 3 Events.

FidelisRaven #3 Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:13 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 39563 battles
  • 560
  • [WHO] WHO
  • Member since:
    05-23-2012
WG boys, anything you'd like to clarify perhaps?

AndyTankOne #4 Posted 21 April 2016 - 07:13 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 33100 battles
  • 11
  • Member since:
    09-21-2013

This really makes it difficult for the lesser clans to get onto the map, every landing I look at has at least one of the top 100 clans in the landing, all that's going to happen is that all the top clans will just keep spamming the landings stopping anybody else from getting on, all I can say is that it's set up for the top clans to make even more FAME points and GOLD and detriment any other clan trying to make a go of it. As always these Campaigns only favor the TOP, WG should at least take the rest of the players into consideration when screwing with the rules they make, I guess the TOP clans have more influence with WG and what they want they get.

 



Bronn1 #5 Posted 21 April 2016 - 10:46 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 54420 battles
  • 408
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    12-17-2011
And what form of competition would you propose that will make the top clans lose and the weak ones win?

AndyTankOne #6 Posted 21 April 2016 - 12:16 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 33100 battles
  • 11
  • Member since:
    09-21-2013
I have no problem with the TOP clans winning (that's why they are at the top because they are good and active), what I have is a problem with is the complete bias towards the TOP clans and making it all that more easier for them to accrue all the gold and fame points, if they are only allowed to hold land and attack from there they will still be able to dominate the map but it would give lesser clans a chance to get onto the map, maybe to be pushed off again by a top clan no problem, but in every instance you are always at a complete disadvantage as a smaller clan because if you try to get land the top clans are attacking the landings as well as their surrounding lands, if they were to concentrate on attacking other land owners form held positions (as the original rule was meant to encourage) the lesser clans might be in with a chance to get some rewards from landing and short term land holdings.

Raffy5 #7 Posted 21 April 2016 - 12:22 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26711 battles
  • 1,977
  • Member since:
    07-09-2012

What short land holding if in order to get the land you still need to win vs the big bad top clan that owns it?

 

Same crap every campaign, crying only big bad clans get rewards, when all previous campaigns showed that lesser skilled players from lesser skilled clans also got the rewards.



DosMetros #8 Posted 21 April 2016 - 09:13 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 24068 battles
  • 223
  • Member since:
    12-01-2010
[edited]

Edited by BigBadVuk, 12 May 2016 - 08:27 AM.
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content.


Fighto #9 Posted 21 April 2016 - 09:43 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35340 battles
  • 950
  • [TAC] TAC
  • Member since:
    02-09-2011

View PostDosMetros, on 21 April 2016 - 08:13 PM, said:

 

[edited]

 

Fame , warpacking, mission rigging cheats , do you honestly think anyone takes anything you say seriously? Youtube is full of your clan either cheating or acting like arseholes and your reply here says it all. Your attitude has all the hallmarks of  a sad pathetic small little man/child.

Edited by BigBadVuk, 12 May 2016 - 08:27 AM.


arturo112 #10 Posted 21 April 2016 - 09:54 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9034 battles
  • 578
  • Member since:
    06-02-2013

View PostFighto, on 21 April 2016 - 08:43 PM, said:

 

Fame , warpacking, mission rigging cheats , do you honestly think anyone takes anything you say seriously? Youtube is full of your clan either cheating or acting like arseholes and your reply here says it all. Your attitude has all the hallmarks of  a sad pathetic small little man/child.

 

Exactly, I can't wait for when they only allow certain mods to be used in the client. Then FAME will be exposed for the cheaters that we all know they are!

 

Spoiler

 



DosMetros #11 Posted 21 April 2016 - 10:15 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 24068 battles
  • 223
  • Member since:
    12-01-2010

View PostFighto, on 21 April 2016 - 08:43 PM, said:

 

Fame , warpacking, mission rigging cheats , do you honestly think anyone takes anything you say seriously? Youtube is full of your clan either cheating or acting like arseholes and your reply here says it all. Your attitude has all the hallmarks of  a sad pathetic small little man/child.

 

Glad to see I triggered you to share what you really think instead of beating around the bush :trollface:

roastedlemon #12 Posted 21 April 2016 - 10:47 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20057 battles
  • 675
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View PostFighto, on 21 April 2016 - 08:43 PM, said:

 

Fame , warpacking, mission rigging cheats , do you honestly think anyone takes anything you say seriously? Youtube is full of your clan either cheating or acting like arseholes and your reply here says it all. Your attitude has all the hallmarks of  a sad pathetic small little man/child.

 

I taste salt...

JohnnyMaverik #13 Posted 22 April 2016 - 12:52 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 16903 battles
  • 704
  • Member since:
    03-10-2013
We got land today and I'm pretty sure we're crap.

maroar #14 Posted 22 April 2016 - 08:05 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29713 battles
  • 2,470
  • [G__G] G__G
  • Member since:
    10-02-2012

View PostFighto, on 21 April 2016 - 09:43 PM, said:

 

Fame , warpacking, mission rigging cheats , do you honestly think anyone takes anything you say seriously? Youtube is full of your clan either cheating or acting like arseholes and your reply here says it all. Your attitude has all the hallmarks of  a sad pathetic small little man/child.

 

 

Wanna bet on those?



Fighto #15 Posted 22 April 2016 - 10:19 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35340 battles
  • 950
  • [TAC] TAC
  • Member since:
    02-09-2011

View Postmaroar, on 22 April 2016 - 07:05 AM, said:

 

 

Wanna bet on those?

 

Sure

 


Raffy5 #16 Posted 22 April 2016 - 10:22 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26711 battles
  • 1,977
  • Member since:
    07-09-2012

I bet that if WG implements that key thingy into accepted mods and bans all those that use the illegal mods, we will see much more tomatoes/lemons/oranges getting banned then we would see unicums.

 

But yeah, in za brain of za tomato: hax+prem ammo make you unicum.


Edited by pussinbootsraffy, 22 April 2016 - 10:23 AM.


Fighto #17 Posted 22 April 2016 - 10:25 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35340 battles
  • 950
  • [TAC] TAC
  • Member since:
    02-09-2011

View Postroastedlemon, on 21 April 2016 - 09:47 PM, said:

 

I taste salt...

 

It's called calling It as you see it, its also  based on experiences and interactions and all are negative. The funny thing is I never had unpleasant experiences like that with OMC. 

If calling people shitters plagues and tomatoes doesn't highlight the attitude problem then the community in this game is even more toxic than I thought 



roastedlemon #18 Posted 22 April 2016 - 10:35 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20057 battles
  • 675
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View PostFighto, on 22 April 2016 - 09:25 AM, said:

 

It's called calling It as you see it, its also  based on experiences and interactions and all are negative. The funny thing is I never had unpleasant experiences like that with OMC. 

If calling people shitters plagues and tomatoes doesn't highlight the attitude problem then the community in this game is even more toxic than I thought 

 

If you get better then you wont be called sh1t... simples.

Edited by roastedlemon, 22 April 2016 - 10:36 AM.


Fighto #19 Posted 22 April 2016 - 10:43 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35340 battles
  • 950
  • [TAC] TAC
  • Member since:
    02-09-2011

View Postroastedlemon, on 22 April 2016 - 09:35 AM, said:

 

If you get better then you wont be called sh1t... simples.

Cheers but I can more than hold my own. I play tanks that I enjoy playing, I don't pick a tank in the garage based on what fancy colours it gives me at the end of the game. This wn8 obsession is actually a sort of mental illness. 



maroar #20 Posted 22 April 2016 - 10:53 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29713 battles
  • 2,470
  • [G__G] G__G
  • Member since:
    10-02-2012

View PostFighto, on 22 April 2016 - 10:19 AM, said:

 


 

 

I see your reading skills fail you, as you did not see the bolded statements.

btw. Who says those people were not punished? By WG and the clan?


 

So where is your evidence for the warpack and cheats?






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users