Jump to content


Version 9.15: Supertest Sneak Peek


  • Please log in to reply
319 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 21 April 2016 - 04:45 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 24,443
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
There are some interesting changes planned for various vehicles with the upcoming update.

Full news text

Very_Toxic_Player #2 Posted 21 April 2016 - 04:55 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 5065 battles
  • 73
  • Member since:
    01-01-2016
so this grille 15 looks like a ue 57 

FrostyTheMerciless #3 Posted 21 April 2016 - 04:59 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 24241 battles
  • 114
  • Member since:
    02-15-2011
I think that nerf to T-22 medium is too big. I need just 1 more mission for this tank (29 missions without rigging, so don't say things like 'Report him, he is rigger' ). I know that the armor is OP, but still the nerf is too big

Edited by no_swear, 21 April 2016 - 05:39 PM.


Very_Toxic_Player #4 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:02 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 5065 battles
  • 73
  • Member since:
    01-01-2016
also why was the t-22 medium nerfed so much? hardly anybody has it whats the point of even changing it

Robotic_Knight #5 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:05 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 1597 battles
  • 10
  • [JFSRB] JFSRB
  • Member since:
    11-23-2013
O-I is nerfed? Hail god...

Aphraid #6 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:06 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32222 battles
  • 317
  • Member since:
    04-04-2013
So tell me WG how you figure the KJPs "buff" or "rebalance" came to be. The penetration is a huge improvement. Now if I could still hit anything with it. The extremely narrow gun traverse on the KJP forces you to turn the hull to lead any long range shot. So why did you feel it was a good idea to increase the already KV2 like dispersion even more? 2 sec to 1.8 aimtime won't negate the 20% increased dispersion. Especially when it already had a bad value? Do you even play the tanks before and after changes? Or just look at numbers?

Cobra6 #7 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:06 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16295 battles
  • 14,998
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

Good to see the Pz IV/V finally be made competitive and also a buff to the T95E6 which was well deserved.

 

Any news on buffs for the T7/T8 new CZ tanks which are sub-par at the moment?

 

Cobra 6



NotSoUnicum0507 #8 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:09 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 24391 battles
  • 599
  • Member since:
    04-19-2011
I welcome the pen buff to the Nippon Tiger, but the mobility will still be abysmal. I am angry about the Challenger tho, WG should have buffed it before I bought it XD It is the same as the T30. I sold it, it got improved :)

Ni7R0 #9 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:13 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11419 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    05-11-2012
R.I.P WT e100 :(

German_Dunc #10 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:18 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 35650 battles
  • 1,858
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

View PostAphraid, on 21 April 2016 - 05:06 PM, said:

So tell me WG how you figure the KJPs "buff" or "rebalance" came to be. The penetration is a huge improvement. Now if I could still hit anything with it. The extremely narrow gun traverse on the KJP forces you to turn the hull to lead any long range shot. So why did you feel it was a good idea to increase the already KV2 like dispersion even more? 2 sec to 1.8 aimtime won't negate the 20% increased dispersion. Especially when it already had a bad value? Do you even play the tanks before and after changes? Or just look at numbers?

 

 

This.

 


 

The problem with the KJpz isn't the penetration - it's the god awful gun handling, poor camo after firing, low DPM, and the fact it's over-tiered.


 

Buff pen, skew handling even more, keep KJpz as worst TD in game (never mind worst premium, worst Tier VIII, etc)


 



MR_FIAT #11 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:18 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18460 battles
  • 1,528
  • [_RBP_] _RBP_
  • Member since:
    05-16-2015

View PostNi7R0, on 21 April 2016 - 05:13 PM, said:

R.I.P WT e100 :(

 

GOOD, also the nerfs to the O-I exp. and O-I are glorious :B

eCapter #12 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:20 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22382 battles
  • 275
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

1. Replaced the Waffenträger auf E 100 with the Grille 15.  <3 byebye [edited]super WT

 

T1 Cunningham                this is the 3rd time i think

 

But why are T14 and Excelsior not buffed? They are allready considered so bad that WG removed them.....and hd for them would be nice too. And pls pls pls let the FV4202 drive 40 kmh.....and the dpm is also crap. Did you notice that that prem T7 FVxxxx has more dpm?


Edited by eCapter, 21 April 2016 - 05:22 PM.


klecara #13 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:20 PM

    Private

  • Beta Tester
  • 22719 battles
  • 5
  • [EPICS] EPICS
  • Member since:
    12-20-2010
Are you serious WG ?!?!?! WHY THE HELL DO YOU NERF T-54 light ?!?!?! It should be actually buffed af... his gun is terrible even when 1vs1 with a light tank (one of the worst guns on light tanks to be honest). Also his armor which you say can stop some penetrations is way worse than it sounds... everyone penetrate him like butter. Get you s**t together wargaming!!! I'm really pissed at the way you all work, you nerf tanks that should be buffed and buff or leave buffed tanks that should be nerfed so much! :X Really bad work wargaming, I am disappointed. (AT LEAST you nerf very few tanks that should be nerfed like O-I, O-I exp. and T-22...for now).

Monster95alpha19 #14 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:22 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 35389 battles
  • 4,000
  • [TKEA] TKEA
  • Member since:
    10-28-2011
finally, you had mercy for the T95E6..this tank really needs it

Cyoor #15 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:24 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32775 battles
  • 225
  • [SOLAR] SOLAR
  • Member since:
    04-26-2013

I am surprised that the IS-6 didn't get ground resistance buff, since it was so obvious that it is much slower in every way now since the new physics in 9.14.

Also the nerf to O-I might not be the right one tbh.. It was already a tank that was OP in tier 6 games and totally sucked in tier 8 games. Making it even slower to turn and shoot will not make much of a difference against tier 6 where it can stand and take a beating forever, but against tier 8 tanks, this will make it even more useless.
A better way to nerf it would have been to add a weakspot that would always be possible to shoot (even when facing it from the front) but needing some skill to do so, by making the cupola on the turret to be 100 or 120mm instead of 150mm as it is now.



ShadowStalker1991 #16 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:24 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 16732 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    07-19-2011
well japaneese heavies are going to be completly useless and way too slow now guess it was useful until the over-nerf that they are planning for them

Villan1 #17 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:26 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22756 battles
  • 549
  • [PZUNI] PZUNI
  • Member since:
    03-28-2012

Generally good, but I think the main problem with the O-I Exp. is the alpha and crazy pen. Simmilar with the O-I, it can still one-shot other T6 heavies(Churchill VII grind was hell because of that.....    ...thing), even if hitting them will be harder. And it remains a premium ammo only opponent. Maybe give it a weakspot somewhere? But I'll take anything that makes those monstrosities weaker

 

Overall looks good, GJ Wargaming

 

Ps.:

Thank you for removing the ****** Waffelcopter! 


Edited by Villan1, 21 April 2016 - 05:30 PM.


Aphraid #18 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:28 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32222 battles
  • 317
  • Member since:
    04-04-2013

View Postduncham1, on 21 April 2016 - 04:18 PM, said:

 

 

This.

 


 

The problem with the KJpz isn't the penetration - it's the god awful gun handling, poor camo after firing, low DPM, and the fact it's over-tiered.


 

Buff pen, skew handling even more, keep KJpz as worst TD in game (never mind worst premium, worst Tier VIII, etc)


 

 

Sure the penetration buff will help some since you dont have to have 100% precise hits to be able to pen tier 8 and below. But it doesnt have pref.mm so what about those t9 and 10s  :(

twodogsfighting #19 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:30 PM

    Private

  • Beta Tester
  • 29952 battles
  • 14
  • [666TH] 666TH
  • Member since:
    07-21-2010

Block Quote

 2. Added the support of scenarios when playing solo (14 bots + 1 players in one team against 15 bots).

 

I thought this was the case in most matches anyway.

_Pacfren #20 Posted 21 April 2016 - 05:34 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 47957 battles
  • 217
  • [LGACY] LGACY
  • Member since:
    11-07-2013

View Postklecara, on 21 April 2016 - 04:20 PM, said:

Are you serious WG ?!?!?! WHY THE HELL DO YOU NERF T-54 light ?!?!?! It should be actually buffed af... his gun is terrible even when 1vs1 with a light tank (one of the worst guns on light tanks to be honest). Also his armor which you say can stop some penetrations is way worse than it sounds... everyone penetrate him like butter. Get you s**t together wargaming!!! I'm really pissed at the way you all work, you nerf tanks that should be buffed and buff or leave buffed tanks that should be nerfed so much! :X Really bad work wargaming, I am disappointed. (AT LEAST you nerf very few tanks that should be nerfed like O-I, O-I exp. and T-22...for now).

 

+1




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users