Jump to content


Update 9.15 General Feedback

9.15

  • Please log in to reply
271 replies to this topic

Ph3lan #1 Posted 23 May 2016 - 06:59 PM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 16554 battles
  • 258
  • Member since:
    11-17-2010

Please leave any general feedback on update 9.15 in this thread.

 

If you have feedback to give regarding one of the following topics, please do it in the corresponding thread.

Physics Improvements

Sounds Improvements

Vehicle Characteristics Changes

Grille 15 - New German Tier X TD

Garage UI Improvements

Battle HUD Improvements

New HD Models

9.15 Update Bug Reports



the_bomber_invader #2 Posted 24 May 2016 - 04:46 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 8834 battles
  • 104
  • [_PZF_] _PZF_
  • Member since:
    02-21-2015
YES! Can't wait! Love your updates guys, keep the good work going. Can't wait for future update's! 9.15 HYPE!!

PathfinderII #3 Posted 24 May 2016 - 05:01 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 46536 battles
  • 38
  • [TFUK] TFUK
  • Member since:
    07-08-2012

Good update, but let me get this straight. You're telling me that a platoon of kv1 + Is3 is totally ok, and a platoon of IS3 and t-28 gets only 10 % penalty? Or, IS7 + kv85 would just have a penalty of 20%? The kv85 would earn more xp anyway in case he does something useful but high chance they just won't.

You didn't fix the fail platoon problem in my book. I can't care how much Xp they will get after that battle, just if they are useful for the team.

 

" vehicles of the same Tier make a platoon an effective tactical unit, which is not a burden on their team"

So you admit the ineffectiveness and burden of vehicles of even different tiers (2 tier difference), but still allow platoons of not having even remotely the same MM.


Edited by PathfinderII, 24 May 2016 - 05:10 PM.


Vedrano #4 Posted 24 May 2016 - 05:02 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 31870 battles
  • 250
  • Member since:
    08-21-2011

Finaly, Scorpion can be now played fair :) 

 

 



AlucardPina #5 Posted 24 May 2016 - 05:03 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 48374 battles
  • 55
  • Member since:
    05-27-2013

HI 

WG staff

Its in 9.15 that WG will ban modes,hacks,warpacks and Andy caps????

Even in stronghold and CW abuse use of hacks/warpacks/modes. 

We do not need handy caps to play WOT
We need a clean game to play whit good environment 

TKS and i hope on 9.15 you fix this problem, its not a a new one and not hard to fix
 

 

 

 



SlyMeerkat #6 Posted 24 May 2016 - 05:07 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 12104 battles
  • 746
  • [FILO] FILO
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013
Looking forward to the next patch, no more having to use XVM

leggasiini #7 Posted 24 May 2016 - 05:20 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 982 battles
  • 2,726
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012
type 5 buff :P 

Zeebad #8 Posted 24 May 2016 - 05:36 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23991 battles
  • 216
  • [WOPR] WOPR
  • Member since:
    12-29-2012
Regarding the rewards for platooning with same tier vehicles - The article reads as if it doesn't take into account light tank matchmaking. Is that correct? If so, it's a bit of a fail.

omegadavid #9 Posted 24 May 2016 - 05:41 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 32851 battles
  • 33
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011
the wg team should have rebalanced the cannon of the t26e4 because the penetration is HORRIBLE!!! the cannon is long so it should have higer penetration. please fix this problem 

fryboy1975 #10 Posted 24 May 2016 - 06:13 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 29145 battles
  • 144
  • Member since:
    02-09-2013
I thought the LWT was being nerfed??? Or have i missed that??

Cyoor #11 Posted 24 May 2016 - 06:19 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32774 battles
  • 225
  • [SOLAR] SOLAR
  • Member since:
    04-26-2013

So if a valentine II and a luchs play together, that will be "fine" even though the luchs got tier 7 as maximum battle tier and the valentine II got tier 4 as maximum battle tier.

At the same time if a tier 8 light tank party up with a tier 9 arty, they will not get any bonus even though the both got the same maximum battle tier.

This will add even more confusion than before and create MORE fail platoons probably...

I dont think that this should have been implemented at all like this.



guest273 #12 Posted 24 May 2016 - 06:31 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 34236 battles
  • 2,154
  • [EPOCH] EPOCH
  • Member since:
    05-31-2012
Returning the old developers to WG was a really good step FORWARD. Those guys wanted to make a game they would enjoy playing themselves, as well as others. Why did you fjucking kick them out of WG in the first place Victor? Why? Huh???

__Spectre #13 Posted 24 May 2016 - 06:31 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 31545 battles
  • 235
  • Member since:
    07-08-2011

View PostZeebad, on 24 May 2016 - 04:36 PM, said:

Regarding the rewards for platooning with same tier vehicles - The article reads as if it doesn't take into account light tank matchmaking. Is that correct? If so, it's a bit of a fail.

 

If it is based on tiers for scouts, it will mean that scouts can only get the bonus from platoons with other scouts on the same tier or non-scout tier 8s which is idiotic considering tier 8 scouts have the same battle tiers as tier 9 typically.. what a mess that will be. 2x Lowes and 1x 1390 in platoon lol. 



PanzerWiener #14 Posted 24 May 2016 - 06:37 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 44089 battles
  • 192
  • [L10NS] L10NS
  • Member since:
    01-27-2011
NEW bonus/pen system or "How to try and Jury rig the MM so it can deal with platoons" ie make them all the same tier. lol  pure genius.

ScoutingForGirls #15 Posted 24 May 2016 - 06:43 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 30563 battles
  • 48
  • [QSF-C] QSF-C
  • Member since:
    12-19-2012
GG WG - They don't even seem to understand their own matchmaking.  I guess if lights want to platoon they just platoon with same tier non-scouts and ... oh wait a minute - that's a fail platoon!  

Edited by ScoutingForGirls, 24 May 2016 - 06:43 PM.


Kazonac #16 Posted 24 May 2016 - 06:50 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 13771 battles
  • 17
  • Member since:
    11-17-2014
Awsome WG , great job, ty :)

Gremlin182 #17 Posted 24 May 2016 - 06:53 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38780 battles
  • 6,125
  • Member since:
    04-18-2012
Looking forward to it and to getting involved in the sandbox program if im lucky

Axe_Killer #18 Posted 24 May 2016 - 06:58 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 20803 battles
  • 156
  • Member since:
    09-10-2011

View Postomegadavid, on 24 May 2016 - 06:41 PM, said:

the wg team should have rebalanced the cannon of the t26e4 because the penetration is HORRIBLE!!! the cannon is long so it should have higer penetration. please fix this problem 

 

Yes, and after that give it normal mm....

Jegerkake #19 Posted 24 May 2016 - 06:59 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 17563 battles
  • 20
  • Member since:
    05-25-2011

Block Quote

  • Removal of the Rampage Game Mode

 

Does this mean one can't get a hold of the T-22 med anymore?



Axe_Killer #20 Posted 24 May 2016 - 07:19 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 20803 battles
  • 156
  • Member since:
    09-10-2011

View PostJegerkake, on 24 May 2016 - 07:59 PM, said:

 

Does this mean one can't get a hold of the T-22 med anymore?

 

Yes... And as far as i am concerned it wont be back anytime soon...





Also tagged with 9.15

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users