Jump to content


LTP powercreeped by t-127

ltp t-127

  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

kaneAAA #1 Posted 27 June 2016 - 10:55 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 41950 battles
  • 1,880
  • [SKRAP] SKRAP
  • Member since:
    11-18-2012
WG what have you done to poor LTP? T-127 is now just superior, and is similar special MM. Buff LTP to be competitive!!!! It's also Russian, and you wouldn't want Russia to look weak, so give it something decent. Not good.


ricoBenitez1 #2 Posted 27 June 2016 - 11:53 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 513 battles
  • 631
  • Member since:
    10-29-2013

View PostkaneAAA, on 27 June 2016 - 09:55 AM, said:

WG what have you done to poor LTP? T-127 is now just superior, and is similar special MM. Buff LTP to be competitive!!!! It's also Russian, and you wouldn't want Russia to look weak, so give it something decent. Not good.

 

Cant they just not nerf you ?

_underscored_ #3 Posted 27 June 2016 - 11:54 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 59624 battles
  • 393
  • Member since:
    04-19-2014
127 has always been superior.

250swb #4 Posted 27 June 2016 - 12:23 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 23230 battles
  • 5,568
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
Yes, the T-127 has always been OP, but not many people realise what it can do.

Baldrickk #5 Posted 27 June 2016 - 01:18 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 32140 battles
  • 16,185
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    03-03-2013
Isn't the LTP the newer tank?

BigFellas_Dad #6 Posted 27 June 2016 - 01:38 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 42185 battles
  • 1,610
  • Member since:
    06-19-2013
I think both tanks are rubbish

TheMarketGardener #7 Posted 27 June 2016 - 01:40 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 18844 battles
  • 2,962
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    01-22-2011
The T-127 has been in the game way longer than the LTP.

Hedgehog1963 #8 Posted 27 June 2016 - 01:41 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 53693 battles
  • 7,858
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011
Yep.  Can confirm T-127 has always been a better tank than the LTP.   Was by firm favourite at tier III until I got a BT-SV. 

_underscored_ #9 Posted 27 June 2016 - 02:27 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 59624 battles
  • 393
  • Member since:
    04-19-2014
The LTP is indisputably a good tank to learn the game though!

Balc0ra #10 Posted 27 June 2016 - 02:33 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 70945 battles
  • 19,592
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
One is a free gift tank, the other is a bought tank. I suspect that is why. The 10mm extra hull armor with that slope is the reason I use the T-127 over the LTP for crew training. Only used the LTP so far when there is a big crew bonus events.

Hedgehog1963 #11 Posted 27 June 2016 - 02:44 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 53693 battles
  • 7,858
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View PostBalc0ra, on 27 June 2016 - 01:33 PM, said:

One is a free gift tank, the other is a bought tank. I suspect that is why. The 10mm extra hull armor with that slope is the reason I use the T-127 over the LTP for crew training. Only used the LTP so far when there is a big crew bonus events.

 

Strange to relate the T-127 was the first free tank I ever received.  Running up to Xmas 2011 there was a promo  code with some web site; it may have been PC Gamer or something similar.  Anyway it was a great gift, it wasn't available in the premium shop for an age, and the crew went on to one of my higher tier LTs later.  Recently I've been leveling up my T54lwt crew and I have had a few games in it. I'd play it more if the map rotation at tier II wasn't dead.

 

I'm sure, someone may correct me, that for the first few years I had this...  it never met Tier IV as it does now.



mortalsatsuma #12 Posted 27 June 2016 - 02:47 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14597 battles
  • 1,751
  • Member since:
    06-13-2014

View Post_underscored_, on 27 June 2016 - 11:54 AM, said:

127 has always been superior.

 

This. 

Slyspy #13 Posted 27 June 2016 - 03:15 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 14627 battles
  • 17,329
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011
How can a new tank be powercrept by an older one?

Pandabird #14 Posted 27 June 2016 - 03:18 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 36512 battles
  • 4,592
  • [KOFF] KOFF
  • Member since:
    05-19-2013
Nice trollink kane xD



I still prefer the LTP. It feels more comfortable to drive and has super camo.
And that turnrate is just lol^^


T-127 armor feels like the powercreep victim tbh. It used to be pretty insane, now it's just meh

Fluffy_The_Destroyer #15 Posted 27 June 2016 - 03:21 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 53 battles
  • 4,402
  • Member since:
    12-07-2014
Wouldent say T-127 is even decent.. got penned by a BT-7 Arty frontally before!

Balc0ra #16 Posted 27 June 2016 - 03:29 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 70945 battles
  • 19,592
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostHedgehog1963, on 27 June 2016 - 02:44 PM, said:

 

Strange to relate the T-127 was the first free tank I ever received.  Running up to Xmas 2011 there was a promo  code with some web site; it may have been PC Gamer or something similar.  Anyway it was a great gift, it wasn't available in the premium shop for an age, and the crew went on to one of my higher tier LTs later.  Recently I've been leveling up my T54lwt crew and I have had a few games in it. I'd play it more if the map rotation at tier II wasn't dead.

 

I'm sure, someone may correct me, that for the first few years I had this...  it never met Tier IV as it does now.

 

It's a tier III so the map rotation is not bad there now that they have added more maps into it a few patches back. Tier 1 to 2 is still boring as they only did add one map "winter Himmelsdorf" that gets the count up to 3, so the tier 2 +0 MM gift tanks hardly get's used. Tho I use this and the M3 Light to train my scout crews now on the Russian branch. The T-127 was the first premium I bought along with the Pak 40 only a few days after I started, it saw tier IV matches even then.

krautjaeger #17 Posted 27 June 2016 - 03:48 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 13735 battles
  • 2,333
  • Member since:
    05-17-2014
These tanks would be wonderful for new people to learn tanks, if it wasn't for all the senior ones loading all premium ammo and seal clubbing them with it. I took a new recruit out a short while back, and we were totally pummelled by premium ammo from those that's been with the game for some time...

Digglyda #18 Posted 27 June 2016 - 04:16 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 49177 battles
  • 314
  • Member since:
    04-11-2013

Hang on, hang on, hang on.

 

When they gifted us all the LTP (when was that exactly ?) I immediately went and purchased the T-127 from the premium shop, because

 

...it was basically a better tank than the LTP. I'm not sure how the T-127 is guilty of any *powercreep*  when it's always been superior ?



Capus #19 Posted 27 June 2016 - 04:23 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38741 battles
  • 1,785
  • Member since:
    05-13-2012
21k games, whines about a t3 tank. Oh my, i feel so much sympathy ...

krautjaeger #20 Posted 27 June 2016 - 04:29 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 13735 battles
  • 2,333
  • Member since:
    05-17-2014

View PostCapus, on 27 June 2016 - 04:23 PM, said:

21k games, whines about a t3 tank. Oh my, i feel so much sympathy ...

 

Don't forget the padding-tanks ;)




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users