Jump to content


LTP powercreeped by t-127

ltp t-127

  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

_Dunc_ #21 Posted 27 June 2016 - 04:40 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38791 battles
  • 1,937
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011
Not so sure about the limited map rotation thing at the moment. In a fit of boredom the other day I played T-127 or LTP (I forgot which) and got Redshire tier IV game.

b0d #22 Posted 27 June 2016 - 05:13 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 23160 battles
  • 3,920
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    05-22-2015

Yeah the T-127 was better than the LTP, but then again is not the LTP faster?

Guys when you gonna realise speed is actually quite important!?



250swb #23 Posted 27 June 2016 - 05:54 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 23230 battles
  • 5,571
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015

View Postb0d, on 27 June 2016 - 05:13 PM, said:

Yeah the T-127 was better than the LTP, but then again is not the LTP faster?

Guys when you gonna realise speed is actually quite important!?

 

Yes but the T-127 isn't a scout so it doesn't need to go anywhere fast. It plays as a pocket sized medium, even so it can get to the key spots on maps like Ruinberg in plenty of time most of the time.

XRey360 #24 Posted 27 June 2016 - 06:03 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10194 battles
  • 1,977
  • Member since:
    01-31-2014

1) Balance 2.0 could be addressing those issues so no point in whining yet.

 

2) Why the hell making this thread now when both tanks are in game since years?



Capus #25 Posted 27 June 2016 - 08:37 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38741 battles
  • 1,785
  • Member since:
    05-13-2012

View PostXRey360, on 27 June 2016 - 05:03 PM, said:

 

 

2) Why the hell making this thread now when both tanks are in game since years?

I'm guessing someone got killed by a T-127 a few times in a row.

 

Also, there is little point in asking for any buffs to any tank atm, the 'rebalance' is happening, they aren't going to change much to any tank untill that hits the live srv. Then a few months later they'll do another rebalance to fix the mess they made with the first rebalance.


Edited by Capus, 27 June 2016 - 08:38 PM.


b0d #26 Posted 28 June 2016 - 12:11 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 23160 battles
  • 3,920
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    05-22-2015

View Post250swb, on 27 June 2016 - 04:54 PM, said:

 

Yes but the T-127 isn't a scout so it doesn't need to go anywhere fast. It plays as a pocket sized medium, even so it can get to the key spots on maps like Ruinberg in plenty of time most of the time.

 

I was saying to the OP that the reason he gets owned in his LTP by T-127 is because he is playing the t127's game of trading shots instead of using his head and increased speed to outsmart and out position his opponent.

Edited by b0d, 28 June 2016 - 12:12 PM.


lnfernaI #27 Posted 28 June 2016 - 12:16 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 32686 battles
  • 4,427
  • [ICYA] ICYA
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

The only tier 3 Premiums viable to play,are the GrossTraktor,FCM 36 PaK 40,and Pz.S35,and locust.

all other are more-or-less poopoo.



Dru_UK #28 Posted 28 June 2016 - 12:41 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6562 battles
  • 483
  • Member since:
    01-02-2013

View PostlnfernaI, on 28 June 2016 - 12:16 PM, said:

The only tier 3 Premiums viable to play,are the GrossTraktor,FCM 36 PaK 40,and Pz.S35,and locust.

all other are more-or-less poopoo.

 

 

totally disagree with you, I have both LTP and T127 and play them a lot.

The limited matches (seeing only T4 max) means that in general you are ok against most opponents, just hertzers and matildas you got to wathc out for, but matilda is easy to flank in LTP, bit harder in T127


 

Someone mentioned limited maps, when in T4 games these see quite a few other maps that are good, redshire, sandriver, el halluf, erlingberg and a few others I don't remember the names of.



lnfernaI #29 Posted 28 June 2016 - 05:12 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 32686 battles
  • 4,427
  • [ICYA] ICYA
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

View PostDru_UK, on 28 June 2016 - 02:41 PM, said:

 

 

totally disagree with you, I have both LTP and T127 and play them a lot.

The limited matches (seeing only T4 max) means that in general you are ok against most opponents, just hertzers and matildas you got to wathc out for, but matilda is easy to flank in LTP, bit harder in T127


 

Someone mentioned limited maps, when in T4 games these see quite a few other maps that are good, redshire, sandriver, el halluf, erlingberg and a few others I don't remember the names of.

They get pref MM because of the crappy stats they get as for the tank.

The MM in general is the same.



Poddertw #30 Posted 04 July 2016 - 12:17 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 28983 battles
  • 85
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012

well. LTP is average in every way. average gun, armor, speed, sight and bad radio.

 

I increased sight with optics, put on heavy spall liner for armor, increased radio with skill, increased camo with net and now i have a good tank with nice camping ability.

 

The thing is - i made out of an average tank a good tank and its fine for me. Had some games with 9 kills and over 1k dmg for example.



The_Mad_Tank #31 Posted 08 July 2016 - 01:36 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 764 battles
  • 154
  • [OCUK] OCUK
  • Member since:
    07-09-2015

Kane. It's not powercreeped when it has been in the game longer!!!

 

The LTP has always been an inferior tank, but then it was given away free (ignore the game codes that were available for the T-127 even longer ago).






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users