Jump to content


Birth of Titans - Discussion & Feedback


  • Please log in to reply
99 replies to this topic

MrConway #1 Posted 10 August 2016 - 02:37 PM

    Community Coordinator

  • WG Staff
  • 13046 battles
  • 862
  • [CIRC] CIRC
  • Member since:
    10-03-2013

Please let us know your feedback regarding the Birth of Titans campaign in this thread!

 

We want to know what you liked, what you disliked and what you think we could have done differently and/or better!



Endranii_PL #2 Posted 15 August 2016 - 07:19 PM

    Captain

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 23641 battles
  • 2,222
  • Member since:
    04-02-2011
There is a campaign? First time I hear 'bout it...

Keyhand #3 Posted 15 August 2016 - 07:28 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 59634 battles
  • 5,112
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    10-25-2011

It would be nice to get an official announcement about the campaign including the full set of rules (including the formulas for points given out and the system by which possible rewards are given out).

There was some sort of announcement by releasing a trailer but nothing in-depth that would satisfy my need for background information.

Here's the trailer - from the NA server - which is showing tier X tanks fighting, however I think this will be a tier 8 event, no?

 


Edited by Keyhand, 15 August 2016 - 07:32 PM.


TitusLartius #4 Posted 15 August 2016 - 11:40 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 43557 battles
  • 480
  • [GX] GX
  • Member since:
    05-09-2012

View PostMrConway, on 10 August 2016 - 02:37 PM, said:

Please let us know your feedback regarding the Birth of Titans campaign in this thread!

 

We want to know what you liked, what you disliked and what you think we could have done differently and/or better!

 

What is the point when you dont care about our opinion...??? For the previous campaign you ''listened" some crying guys who were spaming this forum, but who played less than 10 battles in that campaign. So what we had? The most boring, pointless campaign ever, which caused multiple players to quit playing this game weeks after it.

FooWayTheTacoMaster #5 Posted 16 August 2016 - 11:30 AM

    Captain

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 32734 battles
  • 2,425
  • [NOS] NOS
  • Member since:
    02-16-2013
Well, it would be nice to have the rules 1 week before it is starting so we can do proper feedback. Also, personally I think 2 weeks is way too long for a thing called "mini event". 7 - 10 days would be great.

HundeWurst #6 Posted 16 August 2016 - 01:29 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 67742 battles
  • 4,280
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

I would like to file an offcial complaint here:

 

But let me start with a question first: Why in gods name do we get another super bad reward tank? Please can anyone answer me that question? The Chieftain/T95 is so damn bad and this time we get an even worse tank. Do we really need that tank in our lifes?

 

How about you Wargaming replace that tank with the Rheinmetall Scorpion? Do we have a deal? Well I guess is should not complain about free stuff. But let me tell you!!! NOBODY WANTS YOUR SHITTY AND BAD PREMIUMS! YOU CAN KEEP THEM FOR YOURSELF!

Instead give me another good one or how about just the gold for that tank. It is not like it would cost more than 7500 gold anyway.

I am not even sure whether I want to play this campaign. But at least you brought back the license system. So if possible I will play my X games and never play that campaign again. Since I guess my KLENU is going for the first place again we, as FAME, might get some more Industrial Ressources!?!!??! YEAH WORTH IT OH BOY I AM HAPPY! Or is there at least a million gold waiting for the winner?

 

And WARGAMING!!!! PLEASE no 14 days! That is so damn stupid! Please! 7 days is more than enough for a tier 8 campaign! PLLLLEEEEEAAAAASSSSEEEEEEEEEE


Edited by WundeWurst, 16 August 2016 - 01:30 PM.


Otto_von_HEATmarck #7 Posted 16 August 2016 - 02:06 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 37849 battles
  • 4,498
  • Member since:
    09-19-2012

well the reward is not worth the effort, it does not even look sexy.

not-impressed.jpg?w=420

 

 



TitusLartius #8 Posted 16 August 2016 - 02:47 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 43557 battles
  • 480
  • [GX] GX
  • Member since:
    05-09-2012

View PostWundeWurst, on 16 August 2016 - 01:29 PM, said:

 Why in gods name do we get another super bad reward tank? Please can anyone answer me that question? The Chieftain/T95 is so damn bad and this time we get an even worse tank. Do we really need that tank in our lifes?

 

 

C'mon, its not that bad, its faster than Chieftain... :P

 

And yes 14 days are long enough for mini campaign, 7 to 10 days is ok. I dont like that only 1000 tanks is for licences, it would be nice if there were 3k, but what to do... Rules, well, 1 day before campaign is good for me, as long as they dont change it during campaign like last time...



FooWayTheTacoMaster #9 Posted 16 August 2016 - 06:27 PM

    Captain

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 32734 battles
  • 2,425
  • [NOS] NOS
  • Member since:
    02-16-2013
I mean in big campaigns the stage of tier 8 is never lasting 14 days and in every stage there are different rules but 14 days same rules same tier... pfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

Micro_Megas #10 Posted 17 August 2016 - 06:51 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 40534 battles
  • 735
  • [NERVA] NERVA
  • Member since:
    07-18-2012

T8 is sooo boring..

 

Pls no more than 1 week, 2 is way too longer for a so ridiculous price



maroar #11 Posted 18 August 2016 - 11:03 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29488 battles
  • 2,462
  • [G__G] G__G
  • Member since:
    10-02-2012

So what was so hard in making the IS-5, M41GF and patton KR the reward tanks? (Maybe even the skorpion G)

They are all nice tanks that can be used in skirmishes and so are usefull and fun to have.

I get why you wouldnt want to do it with the skorpion G, as you haven't made money of it yet.

But come on you can't give people decent tanks, in which they could actually have fun? I hope this time the campaign will actually be good than, as the previous campaign was utter **** and really not worth the reward.

 

KV-4 and T95 "thingies" are ******* useless pieces of ****.



maroar #12 Posted 18 August 2016 - 11:03 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29488 battles
  • 2,462
  • [G__G] G__G
  • Member since:
    10-02-2012
* doublepost, stronk forum

Edited by maroar, 18 August 2016 - 08:18 PM.


Dr_Zap #13 Posted 24 August 2016 - 09:46 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 56963 battles
  • 1,539
  • [HE-JA] HE-JA
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
Sell IS5 for credits, win new IS5. That way at least you make some credits during campaign.

TitusLartius #14 Posted 25 August 2016 - 09:11 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 43557 battles
  • 480
  • [GX] GX
  • Member since:
    05-09-2012

Here is feedback to you: 

 

You are nothing but  scammer crapcompany. You are wondering why you are losing so many players well let me tell you, its because of you and [edited]you hired there. I was complaining about those Urgent orders and prizes before, and some people were like aa you just dont have luck, its not fixed, so i just made spreadsheet and kept record. So few minutes ago i have just activated 100th UO since i am keeping this track, and guess what? FUCKIN 15K CREW XP AGAIN!!! So out of 100 missions 79 times it was or 15k xp or 15k crew xp. Basically we had more chances to win lottery...


Edited by TitusLartius_U4G, 25 August 2016 - 09:13 PM.


Micro_Megas #15 Posted 26 August 2016 - 03:11 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 40534 battles
  • 735
  • [NERVA] NERVA
  • Member since:
    07-18-2012

View PostPanzerZap, on 24 August 2016 - 09:46 PM, said:

Sell IS5 for credits, win new IS5. That way at least you make some credits during campaign.

 

Woaw

Jonathan_Strange #16 Posted 26 August 2016 - 03:20 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18481 battles
  • 366
  • Member since:
    09-15-2011

View PostPanzerZap, on 24 August 2016 - 08:46 PM, said:

Sell IS5 for credits, win new IS5. That way at least you make some credits during campaign.

 

Can I instead sell cheftainshit/95? :facepalm:

 

Another campaign without any rewards... Unless there will be like 1million+ gold for 1st place it will be massive waste of time...



chakmarin #17 Posted 29 August 2016 - 01:38 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28004 battles
  • 260
  • Member since:
    12-15-2012

View PostPanzerZap, on 24 August 2016 - 09:46 PM, said:

Sell IS5 for credits, win new IS5. That way at least you make some credits during campaign.

 

I think selling price is 1000 silver?

RaeudigerRonny #18 Posted 29 August 2016 - 08:50 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 26100 battles
  • 4,744
  • Member since:
    09-04-2013

Chieftain is 1000 Credits. IS-5 is 2,4 Mio Credits.

 



SenpaiErick #19 Posted 30 August 2016 - 03:18 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Commander
  • 45814 battles
  • 520
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    06-08-2011
WG, please consider offering better reward tanks. Below average tanks (like Chieftain T95, which is horrible to play in random) just make us sad. Obj 907 and IS-5 are good examples of how to get it right.

Maauru #20 Posted 30 August 2016 - 03:56 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18540 battles
  • 685
  • [C_V] C_V
  • Member since:
    03-29-2014

View Post_AtIas_, on 26 August 2016 - 03:20 PM, said:

 Unless there will be like 1million+ gold for 1st place it will be massive waste of time...

US:

http://worldoftanks....e=0&aof_size=25

 

RU:

http://worldoftanks....e=0&aof_size=25

 

It say 37k gold in US for 1st clan and 55k gold in RU (although RU have 1-2 more days I think).

EU should be somewhere in between.

 

Seem like way to little for 2 week campaign. Or I am looking into something wrong...






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users