Jump to content


Hybrid Wars Is Released – Machines Engage!


  • Please log in to reply
58 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 30 September 2016 - 10:50 AM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 26,393
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
After a few long months, a new WG Labs project has finally seen the light of day – find out more inside!

Full news text

AppleMars #2 Posted 30 September 2016 - 10:56 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 13226 battles
  • 144
  • [TAKE] TAKE
  • Member since:
    03-27-2014
If u are crazy to pay for it...

SlyMeerkat #3 Posted 30 September 2016 - 11:00 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 16616 battles
  • 2,243
  • [FILO] FILO
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013
Looks like a very interesting game and one to my liking but will wait a little longer as in no rush to get it.

Finer_Details #4 Posted 30 September 2016 - 11:07 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 34890 battles
  • 442
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    06-08-2011
Idiots whining about a game that's not going to effect Wot in any way in 3, 2, 1....

Max_Calibre #5 Posted 30 September 2016 - 11:07 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20637 battles
  • 942
  • [T-OG] T-OG
  • Member since:
    02-03-2014

How much money did 'Hybrid Wars' cost then WG

paid for with all the Gold & Premium Shop profits from the EU servers


Money that could and should be spent on World of Tanks R&D to improve this 'World top 10 game', and it is no question

money on New Maps?

money on better Server Map rotation like 15 different Maps a day, so never get bored?

money on New Match Making that is fair and works and removes the hated '4 minute turbo slaughter battles' hum?


Or is WOT performing exactly as intended and to perfection


Edited by Max_Calibre, 30 September 2016 - 11:08 AM.


WaffleTiger #6 Posted 30 September 2016 - 11:08 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Clan Commander
  • 40804 battles
  • 1,323
  • [5REST] 5REST
  • Member since:
    11-02-2011
<3

KLguns #7 Posted 30 September 2016 - 11:13 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 47631 battles
  • 2,012
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-07-2012

And WHAT has this to do with WOT, this is the WOT portal and WOT forums....try to focus!!

 


Edited by KLguns, 30 September 2016 - 11:16 AM.


Bludsuager #8 Posted 30 September 2016 - 11:16 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 11852 battles
  • 287
  • [-ITU-] -ITU-
  • Member since:
    09-07-2014
Wouldnt have the resources used to develop this game be better spent on your current game? There's a lot that could use more work in this game than a new game you know....

Bludsuager #9 Posted 30 September 2016 - 11:20 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 11852 battles
  • 287
  • [-ITU-] -ITU-
  • Member since:
    09-07-2014

View PostKnitople, on 30 September 2016 - 11:07 AM, said:

Idiots whining about a game that's not going to effect Wot in any way in 3, 2, 1....

 

Three things here...

1) Why make a new game when the current game has a lot that can be improved on.

2) Why advertise the game here? This has NOTHING to do with WoT and this is the WoT forum, might as well advertise other games if they gonna advertise this

3) As stated above that money could be used to fix so much in this game. Wargaming is afraid of "sink funds" yet for all they know the new game could go the way of World of Warplanes, a better use of money would be to advance the current established game rather than a new game.



StinkyStonky #10 Posted 30 September 2016 - 11:27 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 28792 battles
  • 2,191
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    11-02-2015

I presume this is the same forma as WOT just a different setting ?

 

Lots of vehicle choices, grind to upgrade your character, modules and vehicle level.  Premium vehicles and time available for cash ?

 

Does WOT Premium time work in this game as in does in WoWS ?

 

Looking at the prices this looks to have the same high prices as WOT.



Y_O_L_0 #11 Posted 30 September 2016 - 11:39 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19898 battles
  • 907
  • [FUSED] FUSED
  • Member since:
    12-27-2012

"It's time"

 

..fuuck yeah it's time, time to fix WoT!!



O_verdose #12 Posted 30 September 2016 - 11:41 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 40625 battles
  • 109
  • [RO-DM] RO-DM
  • Member since:
    09-24-2014

 

So on wot page we get ads for another probably piece of shyte game from WG....

 

WG managers: understand this - u will never have the same succes as u did with wot. Put all your resources into in and stop any other work on other shyte products.



Eat_My_Bullet #13 Posted 30 September 2016 - 11:43 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 65 battles
  • 549
  • Member since:
    02-18-2011

They should spend this money for better EU servers and in development. Sry but u had how many games?  And they did not have such success then WoT, which is ur main $$ bringer

 

In WoT u should bring more effort, so that people won't start to leave after the real competition game will arive. Till now u had luck that no real real competitions game was not released.

 

I like WoT, is No.1 online game for me, but ur playing to much with fire lately.


Edited by Eat_My_Bullet, 30 September 2016 - 11:45 AM.


Y_O_L_0 #14 Posted 30 September 2016 - 11:47 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19898 battles
  • 907
  • [FUSED] FUSED
  • Member since:
    12-27-2012

View PostEat_My_Bullet, on 30 September 2016 - 10:43 AM, said:

 people won't start to leave after the real competition game will arive. 

 

That big "competition game" doesn't necessarily have to be Arm*ored War*fare or other tank games, I quit WoT for now and I am playing Grim Dawn, which is not a tank game, it's an RPG.



sir_alex_ice #15 Posted 30 September 2016 - 11:49 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 36610 battles
  • 453
  • Member since:
    05-16-2014
How exactly did it hit the shelves when there are no physical copies for it?

jagdcommander #16 Posted 30 September 2016 - 11:53 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 40126 battles
  • 860
  • Member since:
    03-18-2011

 

Not really interested in this new game, but in response to many comments here, maybe people should ask VW why they didn't just keep improving the Beetle rather than introduce different cars (the answer isn't difficult!).

 

Of course they are going to advertise it here because they have a marketing list of people who may or may not be interested. I had a look, it didn't appeal to me, I will continue to play WoT cos I like it.

 

With IT projects, throwing more money and resources at problems is rarely the way to fix issues. The experts in each area need time to resolve problems which are usually far more complicated than any outsider imagines.

 

Am I the only player who actually thinks WoT is an excellent, enjoyable game with an upcoming release addressing several important issues?


Edited by jagdcommander, 30 September 2016 - 11:54 AM.


Tall_Toot #17 Posted 30 September 2016 - 11:57 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 24692 battles
  • 730
  • [HO_PO] HO_PO
  • Member since:
    07-03-2011

So a game full of imaginary vehicles with gravity defying physics, equipped with weaponary that would make them tip over if fired, and 100 tonne monsters drive over terrain where they would sink without trace in reality?

 

No thanks, already got one.



_Sig_ #18 Posted 30 September 2016 - 12:03 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21294 battles
  • 705
  • Member since:
    03-08-2012
I have this crazy idea for Wargaming- maybe focus your resources on improving the one game that actually is earning money for the company? WOWP - flop, WOWS - meh, MoO - I just don't care (30€, really?), and now this childish game... The only thing that I recognize about this game is the title, because it reminds me the term of "hybrid warfare", which is really unfortunate. Hey, we are a Belorussian company seen as a Russian by Westerners. Let's name our new game with the term that is assosciated by many in the Eastern Europe with Russia and the Ukrainian involvement. What can go wrong here?

_Sig_ #19 Posted 30 September 2016 - 12:05 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21294 battles
  • 705
  • Member since:
    03-08-2012

View PostKnitople, on 30 September 2016 - 11:07 AM, said:

Idiots whining about a game that's not going to effect Wot in any way in 3, 2, 1....

 

Pulling away resources form improving WoT surely will not affect WoT in any way. Surely. I wouldn't mind if the concept would provide  a better ROI than WoT, but from what I've seen the game is "meh" at best. WOT is Wargaming  milk cow, not all the other more or less failed side projects...

Eaglax #20 Posted 30 September 2016 - 12:10 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18992 battles
  • 3,485
  • Member since:
    01-12-2012

View PostBludsuager, on 30 September 2016 - 11:20 AM, said:

 

Three things here...

1) Why make a new game when the current game has a lot that can be improved on.

2) Why advertise the game here? This has NOTHING to do with WoT and this is the WoT forum, might as well advertise other games if they gonna advertise this

3) As stated above that money could be used to fix so much in this game. Wargaming is afraid of "sink funds" yet for all they know the new game could go the way of World of Warplanes, a better use of money would be to advance the current established game rather than a new game.

Reasons for:

1) :coin:

2) :coin:

3) more :coin:

 

why "fix" something people spend loads of money on anyways, when you can get more money developing a small game, that you can advertise basically for free on existing platforms with many (most likely interested) people using them.

ofc I as an WOT player would like to see more improvements to the game, but WG is a company after all, and they earn way more money than they could invest properly in WOT..


Edited by Eaglax, 30 September 2016 - 12:18 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users