Jump to content


Premium Shop: 59-Patton


  • Please log in to reply
76 replies to this topic

Bennyboymothman #21 Posted 14 October 2016 - 11:54 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20459 battles
  • 963
  • [PXR] PXR
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011
It's pretty ok actually since the Buff on the penetration values it makes it far more competitive alongside the mod1 and it can bounce a few shells too.

b0d #22 Posted 14 October 2016 - 12:13 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 22036 battles
  • 3,918
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    05-22-2015

pitter patter i can hear the rain falling and chat about it all day but i wont repair my leaky roof.

 

Oh yeah I am so interested in that tank.  Sorry for sarcasm.

 

 

I would like to apologise if any readers found this post or any post toxic and that if you did find it toxic that you will not in anyway self-harm yourself either physically or psychologically as a result of reading this post.



Gremlin182 #23 Posted 14 October 2016 - 12:29 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 54081 battles
  • 8,882
  • Member since:
    04-18-2012

I think the original reason I turned this tank down wasnt actually the huge cupola weak spot it was the gun depression.

At first -9 gun depression seemed excellent, though its true that having part of your tank announce you are coming over a hill well before you have a chance to aim and fire. was a consideration.

 

When I found that -9 was only to the sides and it was -7 to the front I rather lost interest. -9 or even 10 would have made this a rather decent tank.

 

Im beginning to lose patience with the way the stats of tanks are given its way overdue that such stats should be made much more useful either.

 

eg 100 mm frontal armour is only true if the majority is 100 if there is a very obvious weak spot thats easy to hit then that is the true frontal armour value.

In a similar manner stating a tanks speed as a theoretical maximum under perfect conditions is being false.

 

Can we have a bit of clarity in future



THICC_RAT #24 Posted 14 October 2016 - 01:35 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 25256 battles
  • 161
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-09-2012

I actually like this tank a lot 

And turned out i have amazing stats with this thing 

 

But from what i understand, i'm good with tank at are bad, But average with tanks that people enjoy a lot 

I don't get it plz send help



ciprian_dc #25 Posted 14 October 2016 - 01:46 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 40828 battles
  • 11
  • Member since:
    12-04-2011

View PostmArtinko5MB, on 14 October 2016 - 08:44 AM, said:

 

he says that since it's got a huge buff so don't make any conspiracy about it :) it's ridiculous  

 

ofc is just a coincidence.

 

https://www.youtube....h?v=tkjas9BmFIA

 

after 2 days: http://worldoftanks....k-se-mutz-2016/



ybsone #26 Posted 14 October 2016 - 02:34 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 22179 battles
  • 96
  • Member since:
    06-07-2012
I like this tank, but preffer Patton KR, gun handling is very good, turret armour is very good, except for the weakspot, so You should move about to avoid hits. Mobility is good. Rest of the armour is weak.

SlyMeerkat #27 Posted 14 October 2016 - 03:30 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 17752 battles
  • 2,758
  • [FILO] FILO
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013
I shall get this tank at some point but not this time round

_HakunaMatata_ #28 Posted 14 October 2016 - 04:07 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 65153 battles
  • 262
  • Member since:
    08-23-2011

No WG, you will not get my money for Premium tanks in tier 8 that go in tier 10. If people see the value of a premium tank then they would not pay for a tier 8 tank that goes in tier 10 and then becomes meat for tier 10.

 

 

Let those tanks have matches only with tier 9 and I will buy it. Pffff, I have British FV that goes in tier 10. I can't play it at all due to tier 10 matches.


 

My advice to all players is NOT to pay for tanks that go in tier 10.



Tony_EU #29 Posted 14 October 2016 - 04:11 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 51 battles
  • 2,519
  • [RASHA] RASHA
  • Member since:
    04-27-2016
Would love this tank but can't really justify the purchase right now.

lafeel #30 Posted 14 October 2016 - 04:15 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 4964 battles
  • 1,505
  • [LAFIE] LAFIE
  • Member since:
    03-13-2011
QB is not the only person who's looked past the looks and found a excellent tank in this one.

Sir_Ballistic #31 Posted 14 October 2016 - 05:02 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28936 battles
  • 288
  • Member since:
    05-25-2012
I wouldn't even want to drive this Tank if it was given to me free, that cupola is just a redicilous weakspot, as it completely will make the rest of the Tanks rather good armour quite worhtless, you could just as well have made the intire Tank with just 80mm armour. everybody will shoot at the cupola, then it wont matter if the Tank had 1000mm on front sides and back of the hull and turret. as long as the cupola is just 80mm and tall as a skyscraper. WG what are you thinking? people are not stupid, this Tank  is just worthless, do not buy.

Edited by Cozy66, 14 October 2016 - 05:10 PM.


ybsone #32 Posted 14 October 2016 - 06:18 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 22179 battles
  • 96
  • Member since:
    06-07-2012

What? You CAN'T survive tier X match in this tank? and be on top by exp and frags?

http://www.bozhdynsk.../shot_045-2.jpg

http://wotreplays.com/site/2930592



lafeel #33 Posted 14 October 2016 - 06:19 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 4964 battles
  • 1,505
  • [LAFIE] LAFIE
  • Member since:
    03-13-2011

View Postybsone, on 14 October 2016 - 05:18 PM, said:

What? You CAN'T survive tier X match in this tank? and be on top by exp and frags?

http://www.bozhdynsk.../shot_045-2.jpg

http://wotreplays.com/site/2930592

 

Nice rebuttal there. Here have a like  as well :D

ToodlePips #34 Posted 14 October 2016 - 07:04 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 62045 battles
  • 641
  • Member since:
    07-11-2012

View Postybsone, on 14 October 2016 - 05:18 PM, said:

What? You CAN'T survive tier X match in this tank? and be on top by exp and frags?

http://www.bozhdynsk.../shot_045-2.jpg

http://wotreplays.com/site/2930592

 

Would be nice if you had added the credit results as well. I would not be surprised if you had used a number of premium shells in that match, so the question is how much credits you really made in that match. My guess is that the tank won't make much credits in high tier matches, which sort of defeats the purpose.

 

Having said that, I am still tempted to buy it since I have heard some people say it is actually quite fun to play, which is what a game is about at the end of the day. Hm.



lafeel #35 Posted 14 October 2016 - 07:09 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 4964 battles
  • 1,505
  • [LAFIE] LAFIE
  • Member since:
    03-13-2011

View PostToodleWrath, on 14 October 2016 - 06:04 PM, said:

 

Would be nice if you had added the credit results as well. I would not be surprised if you had used a number of premium shells in that match, so the question is how much credits you really made in that match. My guess is that the tank won't make much credits in high tier matches, which sort of defeats the purpose.

 

Having said that, I am still tempted to buy it since I have heard some people say it is actually quite fun to play, which is what a game is about at the end of the day. Hm.

 

Auto-resupply ammunition -21,490

 

Would have found your answer in the replay link if you had bothered to click on that before making that post :P

 

 

EDIT: Frack it, decided to quickly calculate it myself, and it comes out as 18 ap shells, and 4 heat (premium) shells. There's your answer.

 


Edited by lafeel, 14 October 2016 - 07:23 PM.


Alsahli #36 Posted 14 October 2016 - 07:13 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 25634 battles
  • 35
  • Member since:
    01-28-2011
SU-76I or MTLS-1G14 .. please? (Something new atleast)

DMX50_ #37 Posted 14 October 2016 - 07:34 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21451 battles
  • 433
  • [G-ON] G-ON
  • Member since:
    01-30-2011

View Postlafeel, on 14 October 2016 - 07:09 PM, said:

 

Auto-resupply ammunition -21,490

 

Would have found your answer in the replay link if you had bothered to click on that before making that post :P

 

 

EDIT: Frack it, decided to quickly calculate it myself, and it comes out as 18 ap shells, and 4 heat (premium) shells. There's your answer.

 

 

the point people are trying to make is that you spent round 30 euro for the privilege of losing 21k credits a game.

you could just taken any normal t8 medium and saved 30 euro. probably be in plus with silver too



lafeel #38 Posted 14 October 2016 - 07:37 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 4964 battles
  • 1,505
  • [LAFIE] LAFIE
  • Member since:
    03-13-2011

View Postmiljac, on 14 October 2016 - 06:34 PM, said:

 

the point people are trying to make is that you spent round 30 euro for the privilege of losing 21k credits a game.

you could just taken any normal t8 medium and saved 30 euro. probably be in plus with silver too

 

He made nearly 60k without premium. Your point?

 

Just quoted the ammo cost, not the total credit outcome for the game.

 

AS a side note, that's over 59k in PROFIT after ammo, repairs, and consumables.


Edited by lafeel, 14 October 2016 - 07:38 PM.


zakktell #39 Posted 15 October 2016 - 07:20 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28459 battles
  • 319
  • Member since:
    07-24-2011

Well haters gonna hate no matter what you tell or show them that this tank is good.

I have this tank and i have a shitty WR in it and haven't played it a lot but I realy like this tank it is still fun to play in a losing match.

About the cupola...You have an excellent viewrange(400meters) so if you shoot from afar they won't be able to see your cupola.I bounce quite a lot of shells with this tank because 8 from 10 shots are not aimed for my weakspot because if you play it well and move your tank around it is quite hard to hit and people usually miss it a lot.

Also the gun is realy good.Nice RoF nice aim time and it is realy accurate and it has a good pen so you don't realy need that much gold ammo.I haven't used one since i got this tank because it it has a good gun and you can aim for weakspots so you don't need to fire gold.Also it has heat for gold and i hate heat ammo it bounces a lot more tham apcr or ap.ű

 

Edit: I have worse stats in my type 59 which is considered an absolute OP tank that doesn't see tier 10.


Edited by zakktell_a_fereghajtany, 15 October 2016 - 07:22 AM.


Sushil #40 Posted 15 October 2016 - 08:12 AM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 37255 battles
  • 287
  • Member since:
    09-16-2010

The youtube reviews on 59 Patton seems favourable. But I haven't seen a single 59 Patton in the game from yesterday.. It seems the community has a different view from the youtubers / streamers.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users