Jump to content


Which 5th campaign tank?


  • Please log in to reply
90 replies to this topic

Poll: Which tenk (292 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

which tenk if you owned none

  1. 121B - stats TBC (76 votes [26.03%])

    Percentage of vote: 26.03%

  2. Obj 907 (109 votes [37.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 37.33%

  3. T95E6 (15 votes [5.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.14%

  4. Vk 72.01 (32 votes [10.96%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.96%

  5. M60 (60 votes [20.55%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.55%

Vote Hide poll

Dr_ownape #1 Posted 27 October 2016 - 12:42 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 41875 battles
  • 5,386
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

So I might actively try for this campaign and im interested to know which tank seems best.

 

121B - new, shiny, seems better than the standard 121 from the initial stats I have seen

907 - popular at first but rarely see them in randoms now. Is that due to their ability or just players that earnt it not playing nowadays?

VK 72 - potentially getting a buff - does this make it worthy of consideration?

M60 - tumour

T95E6 - know little about it


 

I did, briefly, search for this topic elsewhere and consider posting it to MrC's post but felt it wasn't really feedback.


 


 



alienslive #2 Posted 27 October 2016 - 12:56 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 85019 battles
  • 1,801
  • Member since:
    09-20-2013
907: 1 reason why it is not popular: there was no correction in last wn8 values. It means you need to do much more damage for same wn8 as in obj.140.
T95E6:  has a paper tumor and a gun like the E5.

Edited by alienslive, 27 October 2016 - 12:56 PM.


RaeudigerRonny #3 Posted 27 October 2016 - 01:09 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 26100 battles
  • 4,744
  • Member since:
    09-04-2013

Wouldnt say you dont see the 907s not that often anymore. In T10 SH you see tons of them due to better crew training, same goes for T10 CW, where its the first replacement of Obj 140. That said, its the only one that actually sees CW-Use. The other tanks are simply too bad to be played in teamplay-modes.

 

M60 still earns the coolness-prize for being the "original" CW-reward-tank. Also it looks kinda cool, in my opinion.

 

Vk72 is the only heavy out of them, which also makes it kind of unique between them.

 

T95E6 and 121B are just plain worse than their regular counterparts, in my opinion. And their counterparts arent "good" in the first place.



Keyhand #4 Posted 27 October 2016 - 01:19 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 59607 battles
  • 5,110
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    10-25-2011
Since WG does not give me a choice as to which tank to pick I have to go with 121B :)

Anzezaf #5 Posted 27 October 2016 - 01:42 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20905 battles
  • 1,280
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011
Voted VK7201 for the lulz, it's the worst choice of them all.

Endranii_PL #6 Posted 27 October 2016 - 01:53 PM

    Captain

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 23641 battles
  • 2,222
  • Member since:
    04-02-2011

Nope vk is not even close to the failure which t95e6 is... after all at least with VK you have kinda nice boomstick doing 750dmg.

Personally unless the stats of 121 are "somewhat" good I'm gonna get that effin M60 which is haunting me from the time of first campaign :angry:



Y_O_L_0 #7 Posted 27 October 2016 - 07:55 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19186 battles
  • 906
  • [LGEND] LGEND
  • Member since:
    12-27-2012
How's the Super Pershing?

I am only asking cause I am thinking of getting either the M60 or 121b, but I need to train a crew for the M60. So before I make up my mind, I would like to have a crew trained up for when I decide to get the M60.

Endranii_PL #8 Posted 27 October 2016 - 09:55 PM

    Captain

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 23641 battles
  • 2,222
  • Member since:
    04-02-2011

Not bad for randoms, but on SH it's pure "kanker" slower than t32 and less armored.

If you want to train crew for just this one tank then get the t6 Jumbo and spam t6 SH earning easy creditas and grinding crew.



ooostindrew #9 Posted 27 October 2016 - 09:56 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 41867 battles
  • 375
  • [MEME] MEME
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011
If you don't have a 907 pick that, if you do, pick whatever, the rest are all mediocre at best


Exozen #10 Posted 28 October 2016 - 04:21 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31008 battles
  • 1,068
  • Member since:
    08-16-2011

121B - Has terrible DPM and bad depression just like its brother in-game. 121 we already have is better.

907 - Only competetive tank on ths list , but its a russian medium so crapboring..

VK 72 - Is a funk tank but that 18 sec reload is just asking WG wtf where you guys thinking ?

M60 - more or less same as the M48 with less DPM ( Since HD buff of M48 ). Still sees no competetive play since slow as f***

T95E6 - As a close friend of mine would have said. Worst tier 10 i've ever played. He is ftr 3000Wn8+.

Y_O_L_0 #11 Posted 28 October 2016 - 05:59 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19186 battles
  • 906
  • [LGEND] LGEND
  • Member since:
    12-27-2012

The 121b has -5 degrees of gun depression as far as I know, but I remember seeing the gun bloom values being horrible, something like 0,20+. I wouldn't care about the dpm if it would have 0,10 gun bloom, T-62A / M48 Patton level of gun bloom would be lovely.

If I have to play a medium tank with bad gun hadling then I would rather play a 440 alpha one that occasionally rolls for 500 damage.

Also, why can't WG just implement the Type 69, the 121 was already made up (even if it existed, there are no blueprints, no drawing, no photos), and now WG upgraded their fantasy, how did they even come up with HD graphics for a never seen tank?
 

Edit: checked Tanks.gg, the 121b has 0,14 / 0,14 / 012 gun bloom, which is the same as the 121, not bad I guess. The T-62A and M48 Patton (best gun bloom at tier 10) has 0,10 / 0,10 / 0,8, so the 121b has 40% worse gun bloom then these tanks (please correct me if I am wrong with the percentage). The M60 has 0,10 / 0,10 / 0,10. Though I think the stats for the 121b are outdated on tanks.gg as it shows the 121b has 50 km/h speed (52 km/h on WoT eu offiacial site) and 0,33 accuracy (0,32 on WoT eu official site).


Edited by Y_O_L_0, 28 October 2016 - 08:43 PM.


pallie_the_artillerist #12 Posted 29 October 2016 - 09:55 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17396 battles
  • 1,171
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    01-12-2013
if they don't buff the 121b I'll get the 907, if they do buff they 121b i'll get that

Anzezaf #13 Posted 29 October 2016 - 10:49 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20905 battles
  • 1,280
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011
TBFH, the M60 is in a dire need of buffing. M48 literally went from zero to hero with the buff, and M60 just remained forgotten.

Y_O_L_0 #14 Posted 29 October 2016 - 11:50 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19186 battles
  • 906
  • [LGEND] LGEND
  • Member since:
    12-27-2012

View PostAnzezaf, on 29 October 2016 - 09:49 AM, said:

TBFH, the M60 is in a dire need of buffing. M48 literally went from zero to hero with the buff, and M60 just remained forgotten.

 

How's the M60?

Anzezaf #15 Posted 29 October 2016 - 10:29 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20905 battles
  • 1,280
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011
I'm generous if I say it's mediocre at everything. Pretty much everything except viewrange and gun depression is bad or meh

Y_O_L_0 #16 Posted 30 October 2016 - 10:23 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19186 battles
  • 906
  • [LGEND] LGEND
  • Member since:
    12-27-2012

View PostAnzezaf, on 29 October 2016 - 09:29 PM, said:

I'm generous if I say it's mediocre at everything. Pretty much everything except viewrange and gun depression is bad or meh

 

But... but.... but it has 0,10 gun bloom and 1,8 seconds aim time, a.k.a. super good (best) gun handling. And it has better mobility then the M48, which is also good. Armor? Who needs armor on a tier 10 medium? Hmm, though it has less dpm then the M48, is that it?

Keyhand #17 Posted 30 October 2016 - 10:40 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 59607 battles
  • 5,110
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    10-25-2011
Idk i like my M60, ofc Buffs are always appreciated but i think its more competitive than 30B for example.

Y_O_L_0 #18 Posted 30 October 2016 - 11:46 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19186 battles
  • 906
  • [LGEND] LGEND
  • Member since:
    12-27-2012

View PostKeyhand, on 30 October 2016 - 09:40 AM, said:

i like my M60

 

I remember seeing you do 10k damage on Prohorovka with the M60.



Anzezaf #19 Posted 30 October 2016 - 11:55 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20905 battles
  • 1,280
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011

View PostY_O_L_0, on 30 October 2016 - 10:23 AM, said:

 

But... but.... but it has 0,10 gun bloom and 1,8 seconds aim time, a.k.a. super good (best) gun handling. And it has better mobility then the M48, which is also good. Armor? Who needs armor on a tier 10 medium? Hmm, though it has less dpm then the M48, is that it?

 

M48 has way better gun handling, that thing is almost fully aimed even on fullspeed. Better mobility? I didn't know, looks to me its the same crap.

Keyhand #20 Posted 31 October 2016 - 12:38 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 59607 battles
  • 5,110
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    10-25-2011

View PostY_O_L_0, on 30 October 2016 - 11:46 AM, said:

 

I remember seeing you do 10k damage on Prohorovka with the M60.

 

Full Swagmode - most dmg ever done since they started counting the highest scores on my account is on M60 :)

 

I remember a 12k- round with 704 but that was before highest dmg was recorded.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users