Jump to content


Clan Wars: Fifth Campaign - Rules and Regulations


  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

Th3Grimmi #21 Posted 02 November 2016 - 07:18 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 41931 battles
  • 310
  • Member since:
    02-05-2012

View Posteldrak, on 02 November 2016 - 03:27 PM, said:

How do we get clan Famepoints?

 

By playing clanwar battles during the campaign, fullfilling clan missions during the campaign etc.

Hooshee #22 Posted 02 November 2016 - 07:25 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 35518 battles
  • 402
  • [VAD-V] VAD-V
  • Member since:
    11-22-2012

View PostMaauru, on 02 November 2016 - 12:09 AM, said:

 

No.

Only battle with province owner give x5.

 

But that's another row in the regulations. Why then? I mean in the regulations there are three types:

 

A landing tournament 1
 A battle for a province 5
 A battle for a province with its owner 5

 

So what's the difference between second and third row then?

 


Edited by Hooshee, 02 November 2016 - 07:27 PM.


Y_O_L_0 #23 Posted 02 November 2016 - 09:36 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20963 battles
  • 908
  • [R3BEL] R3BEL
  • Member since:
    12-27-2012

View PostHooshee, on 02 November 2016 - 06:25 PM, said:

 

 

So what's the difference between second and third row then?

 

 

The "A battle for a province" is a battle for a province that has no owner yet, unoccupied land.

The "A battle for a province with its owner" is a battle for a province that is being occupied by a clan, and you are fighting that clan to take the land from them.

 

Either that or the "A battle for a province" is when you are the owner and you have to defend, which makes sense, last campaign when you won the landing (you beat all the other clans) and got to the province where you had to fight the owner, your clan and the owner got 5x the fame points. As far as I remember there were 20x provinces as well, though these ones were occupied by the top clans.



bearcats #24 Posted 03 November 2016 - 11:11 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 29955 battles
  • 344
  • Member since:
    01-17-2012
How many provinces will there be at every stage?

Th13teen_ #25 Posted 09 November 2016 - 11:37 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 32329 battles
  • 13
  • [RINSE] RINSE
  • Member since:
    04-03-2011

As per the very first question asked.... How long is the campaign and also do we have the stage 2 & stage 3 dates yet?

 

Sage 1 - 15th ~ 23rd November

Stage 2 - ?? ~ ??

Stage 3 - ?? ~ ??

 

Would be useful to know what commitment is required of players and for how long. I know it sucks but real life gets in the way sometime!

 

Many thanks.



bearcats #26 Posted 10 November 2016 - 01:22 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 29955 battles
  • 344
  • Member since:
    01-17-2012
Probably they are not announcing it, cuz TX stage is gonna get a x5 event-Multiplier across all battles, rendering all previous stages insignificant.

falconswingclaw #27 Posted 15 November 2016 - 02:52 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 649 battles
  • 42
  • Member since:
    09-09-2016
does somebody know if the camouflage reward is given only via rank or with license as well?

Amerikansky #28 Posted 15 November 2016 - 04:57 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 48627 battles
  • 91
  • [FUSED] FUSED
  • Member since:
    12-26-2011

View PostY_O_L_0, on 01 November 2016 - 04:43 PM, said:

 

I'm guessing the rules were translated from Russian (incompetent translator/s), and whey they wanted to say is that the Obj 907 will receive the "rusty" camo (I don't know what's it called, but you know what I mean, you can't apply camo on it, cause it has that rusty look), the insignia of the Soviet empire (or whatever they were... or are) and the "111" inscription.

 

The last campaign I got the IS-5, but it didn't come with the "rusty" camo, "Soviet" insignia and "111" inscription, like the IS-5's that were given out the very first time, so I can apply camo to my IS-5.

 

I hope it makes sense what I said. Though I don't know what exclusive camo/emblem/inscription does the VK, M60 and T95E6 have.

 

http://ritastatusreport.blogspot.com/2015/11/clan-war-reward-tanks-m60-t95e6-object.html

TankZ3 #29 Posted 17 November 2016 - 03:08 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 44023 battles
  • 705
  • [BIA-] BIA-
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012

I have a question, how is a safe position for the tank for individual players? 7000, 7500, 8000, 8500 ?

 

edit: how many Clan licenses will not be used

 

indnividual players 6000 + not use clan license 1500? = 7500 safe maybe 8000?


Edited by TankZ3, 18 November 2016 - 02:48 PM.


bearcats #30 Posted 17 November 2016 - 06:59 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 29955 battles
  • 344
  • Member since:
    01-17-2012

View PostTankZ3, on 17 November 2016 - 03:08 PM, said:

I have a question, how is a safe position for the tank for individual players? 7000, 7500, 8000, 8500 ?

 

​6000 and above is safe. Below 6000 you are dependent on how the Top50 Clans play out. Now one can tell you exactly how the campaign will finish, but you can check sites advertised here in the forum as well, that will do guesses on how Wildcards will be given to players below place 6000, that are not in Top50 Clans.

8126Jakobsson #31 Posted 17 November 2016 - 09:45 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 74639 battles
  • 4,255
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostTankZ3, on 17 November 2016 - 03:08 PM, said:

I have a question, how is a safe position for the tank for individual players? 7000, 7500, 8000, 8500 ?

 

You're looking good so far 

 

http://wotevent.guil....com/clans/BIA/



razarach_ #32 Posted 18 November 2016 - 12:07 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 46012 battles
  • 54
  • Member since:
    05-26-2013

View PostMaauru, on 02 November 2016 - 12:09 AM, said:

 

No.

Only battle with province owner give x5.

 

thats not true.. if clan A attacks clan B and clan C also attacks B then fight between A and C is also x5... we lost vs B so i got 350 and 50...:)Just hppened to us today.... Good luck...

tdradrian #33 Posted 12 December 2016 - 09:55 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 65884 battles
  • 35
  • [-WBZ-] -WBZ-
  • Member since:
    12-09-2012

I have 2 questions: If a player from top 50 clans sell his place for 80 or 100 euros ( how it is done now) is he going to receive another tank due to personal fame points (top 11k)earned while being in that clan?

If so isn' t it against general rules to sell and make a profit on your product? This mean that he will receive 2 prices is it fare? I understand to give 5 k tanks to top 50 but why alow them to get 8k like it is now?



UnfaireSpielweise #34 Posted 12 December 2016 - 10:06 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 335 battles
  • 3,332
  • Member since:
    12-07-2016

View Posttdradrian, on 12 December 2016 - 09:55 PM, said:

I have 2 questions: If a player from top 50 clans sell his place for 80 or 100 euros ( how it is done now) is he going to receive another tank due to personal fame points (top 11k)earned while being in that clan?

If so isn' t it against general rules to sell and make a profit on your product? This mean that he will receive 2 prices is it fare? I understand to give 5 k tanks to top 50 but why alow them to get 8k like it is now?

 

1. yes if a player leaves a clan and is in top 11k with his points he will get a tank

2. yes if a clan invites someone else for this spot this guy will receive the tank if the clan is in top50 and the guy has at least 15 games played in this clan.

 

and i dont think it is against the rules. because leaving and inviting people to clans is not a crime lol.

and the people who pay moneyz for this..they hopefully are not so stupid to give anybody a chance for proof.


Edited by UnfaireSpielweise, 12 December 2016 - 10:07 PM.


tdradrian #35 Posted 12 December 2016 - 10:22 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 65884 battles
  • 35
  • [-WBZ-] -WBZ-
  • Member since:
    12-09-2012

UnfaireSpielweise, is not against ther rules to leave or enter a clan  but is against general rules to sell WG products without a licence, as for the proof how come clans from top 50 suddenly has players

with 4/5 days in clan and 4k personal rating?


Edited by tdradrian, 12 December 2016 - 10:23 PM.


UnfaireSpielweise #36 Posted 13 December 2016 - 11:03 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 335 battles
  • 3,332
  • Member since:
    12-07-2016
Edited By Moderator

Edited by LordAxalon, 15 December 2016 - 01:14 PM.
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content.


Ober__ #37 Posted 13 December 2016 - 11:28 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 56755 battles
  • 810
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    09-01-2014
Why only in EU server WG banning clans for selling places in clan for CW reward tank? For example we have in EU clan G100 several poor players accepted in past days in clan and I' 100proc sure after Campaign they will leave the clan. 

Ober__ #38 Posted 13 December 2016 - 11:30 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 56755 battles
  • 810
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    09-01-2014
Next clans WHYOU, also several poor players accepted few days ago. Or polaks are untouchables?

UnfaireSpielweise #39 Posted 13 December 2016 - 11:45 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 335 battles
  • 3,332
  • Member since:
    12-07-2016

View PostOberfuhr, on 13 December 2016 - 11:28 AM, said:

Why only in EU server WG banning clans for selling places in clan for CW reward tank? For example we have in EU clan G100 several poor players accepted in past days in clan and I' 100proc sure after Campaign they will leave the clan. 

 

View PostOberfuhr, on 13 December 2016 - 11:30 AM, said:

Next clans WHYOU, also several poor players accepted few days ago. Or polaks are untouchables?

 

Please quote me the part in the rules where it says it is not allowed to invite people to your can within campaign?

 

If you have a proof that there is a payment involved please show it and send it to Wargaming. They will sanctionate it.

But let me guess, you have no proof, it is just the "fact that you know it"?



Cobra6 #40 Posted 13 December 2016 - 11:45 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16467 battles
  • 16,824
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

Yeah that is quite lame to be honest but most of those are probably secondary accounts of people already in the clan I would imagine.

 

*BUT* I think that practice should be combated by WG because now people who generally put a lot of effort into this campaign but just didn't make the initial cut are going to miss out on tanks to people who to all intents and purposes don't deserve them.

 

Cobra 6






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users