Jump to content


WG Support: "SafeShot is illegal"


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

Homer_J #41 Posted 21 November 2016 - 06:39 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 24070 battles
  • 21,521
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostPvt_Duffer, on 21 November 2016 - 05:22 PM, said:

 

Do you mean renderable (as in actually visible)? render range and draw distance are sort of the same thing.

 

I took it to mean the biggest circle on the minimap.



perjantaina #42 Posted 21 November 2016 - 07:43 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 8927 battles
  • 76
  • Member since:
    08-28-2013

most likely have something similiar to minimap tankview coming into the vanilla - atleast variant of it.

only makes sense that way


Edited by perjantaina, 21 November 2016 - 07:45 PM.


XOR42 #43 Posted 22 November 2016 - 02:19 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10081 battles
  • 208
  • [-AWF-] -AWF-
  • Member since:
    04-18-2015

Well,

 

The ASIA guys say safeshot is legal officially. 

 

What is also puzzling me id that they ok'd the night mode and headlight mods as well (that I was not even aware of)

 

o7 commanders.



Aslain #44 Posted 22 November 2016 - 03:20 PM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 14599 battles
  • 9,711
  • [FEAR] FEAR
  • Member since:
    07-20-2010

View PostXOR42, on 22 November 2016 - 02:19 PM, said:

Well,

 

The ASIA guys say safeshot is legal officially. 

 

What is also puzzling me id that they ok'd the night mode and headlight mods as well (that I was not even aware of)

 

o7 commanders.

 

it was already confirmed in previous page... http://forum.worldof...7#entry13403197



janmb #45 Posted 22 November 2016 - 06:58 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 19414 battles
  • 1,582
  • [RDDT] RDDT
  • Member since:
    08-08-2014

View PostHomer_J, on 21 November 2016 - 04:36 PM, said:

 

Another decision which has me baffled. :(

 

I will for once agree. The difference is that I am very happily surprised by this though, while I suspect you are disappointed.

There are a lot of calls on various mods' legality that has me surprised, in both directions.

Carantanien #46 Posted 23 November 2016 - 10:06 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 16595 battles
  • 1,434
  • Member since:
    01-06-2011

View PostGepard_PH, on 21 November 2016 - 09:44 AM, said:

Hello everyone,

at the moment SafeShot does not provide any functionality that would be considered not allowed by the Fair Play Policy.

 

IMO users with safeshot have uber advantage over non-users in getting a very very valuable  badge "Battle Buddy" 

 



Quaksen #47 Posted 23 November 2016 - 03:09 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 23521 battles
  • 1,128
  • [2PDD] 2PDD
  • Member since:
    03-29-2013

View PostCarantanien, on 23 November 2016 - 10:06 AM, said:

IMO users with safeshot have uber advantage over non-users in getting a very very valuable  badge "Battle Buddy" 

Yes, very valuable... especially since it's so damn hard to get. Even a little paint scrub on a teammate, and it's ruined... takes so little to ruin it :P :trollface:



Carantanien #48 Posted 12 January 2017 - 11:12 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 16595 battles
  • 1,434
  • Member since:
    01-06-2011

Sorry for bumping this old tread:

 

First page (post #1):  Safeshot is illegal (customer support)

Second page (post #26): Safeshot is legal (WG employee)

 

Legal or not?

 



Kaeptn #49 Posted 12 January 2017 - 11:54 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 39389 battles
  • 1,437
  • Member since:
    01-08-2011
think of it as schroedingers mod.

CmdRatScabies #50 Posted 12 January 2017 - 12:33 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21708 battles
  • 1,143
  • Member since:
    10-12-2015

View PostCarantanien, on 12 January 2017 - 11:12 AM, said:

Sorry for bumping this old tread:

 

First page (post #1):  Safeshot is illegal (customer support)

Second page (post #26): Safeshot is legal (WG employee)

 

Legal or not?

 

 

How many tens of thousands of players would have been banned in the last wave if it was illegal?

LR130 #51 Posted 12 January 2017 - 12:40 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 10012 battles
  • 73
  • [F4RT5] F4RT5
  • Member since:
    10-12-2015

View PostCarantanien, on 12 January 2017 - 11:12 AM, said:

Sorry for bumping this old tread:

 

First page (post #1):  Safeshot is illegal (customer support)

Second page (post #26): Safeshot is legal (WG employee)

 

Legal or not?

 

 

WTF? how hard can it be for Wg to take a stand???? Clear this crapup now!!!!!!

HolgerDK #52 Posted 12 January 2017 - 01:49 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 22144 battles
  • 199
  • Member since:
    01-04-2011

View PostLR130, on 12 January 2017 - 12:40 PM, said:

 

WTF? how hard can it be for Wg to take a stand???? Clear this crapup now!!!!!!

 

Taking a stand doesnt make them any money, so they are indifferent.

plkJaqenHghar #53 Posted 12 January 2017 - 01:51 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28967 battles
  • 780
  • [POK] POK
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012
Learn to read at least last 5-6 posts in a thread to get the "idea"... It was confirmed by WG Staff that SafeShot is a legal mod. WG Staff answers are always more credible then WG Support. SafeShot was even added on a list of "allowed/legal" mods.
 

View PostLR130, on 12 January 2017 - 11:40 AM, said:

 

 

Why bother getting facts, let's just shout randomly and hope for the changes (that already happened...) :-)


Edited by plkJaqenHghar, 12 January 2017 - 01:52 PM.


Quaksen #54 Posted 12 January 2017 - 03:22 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 23521 battles
  • 1,128
  • [2PDD] 2PDD
  • Member since:
    03-29-2013

View PostplkJaqenHghar, on 12 January 2017 - 01:51 PM, said:

Why bother getting facts, let's just shout randomly and hope for the changes (that already happened...) :-)

But it's more fun to just shout randomly without checking any facts first :izmena:

 

Fact is: Safeshot is declared LEGAL. Trust FPP/actual WG Staff over some random customer support guy.


Edited by Quaksen, 12 January 2017 - 03:22 PM.


m1x_angelico #55 Posted 13 January 2017 - 06:02 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16004 battles
  • 292
  • [-VETO] -VETO
  • Member since:
    01-04-2015

View PostKaeptn, on 12 January 2017 - 11:54 AM, said:

think of it as schroedingers mod.

 

And here we go into quantum physics... :teethhappy:

 

Actually some of the players think the rules are quite clear. Still, I am suspecting them to be trolls in disguise.


Edited by m1x_angelico, 13 January 2017 - 06:02 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users