Jump to content


wg - fair play policy?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
5 replies to this topic

Mystery___X #1 Posted 30 November 2016 - 03:18 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 41809 battles
  • 156
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

Dear wargaming EU,

you announced "fair play policy" some weeks ago meaning how you start to "fight" against mods which you finally admit can be considered as cheating.

after some weeks a few days ago you announced proudly how you have banned almost 3000 players getting caught of using these mods.

then the community busted a player by their own who have very good position in campaign player hall of fame also hes clan is doing very good in campaign, that to be said he was not banned by your awesome cheat detection system.

now that the community goes against that clan, you decide to take a side and do everything you can to defend this clan by deleting topics ,editing posts, banning users. as you are so much against those mods dont you think a public humiliation (at least in forums) would be good way to show to those who uses those mods and for those who thinks of using those mods what can happen when you get caught, maybe they will think twice before using those?

 

what is happening is following:

players bring evidence of someone who admitted to use those mods you so much "fight" against, you decided to delete all this, so you take side of a cheater. ironic isnt it?

or you perhaps just try to delete all evidence about the fact your "anticheat" system is so bad that you didnt even catch this cheater? dont worry wg, we the users are very used to the fact you fail most of the times, so we dont judge you more than we already do.

but ignoring completely the community when they bring facts on table makes you just biased. is the turkish community perhaps one of your best customers?

anyway, the way you act now dear WG EU , u just made yourself even bigger fool (if thats even possible) than you already is and shows the true face of your attitude towards the "fair play policy".

basicly it was just a PR trick and your detection system is a failure. gg.



Mystery___X #2 Posted 30 November 2016 - 03:19 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 41809 battles
  • 156
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011
and thanks for those "educational" warning points. i didnt learn.

woolfie #3 Posted 30 November 2016 - 03:23 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 45737 battles
  • 331
  • Member since:
    02-06-2011
Did you really expect 50k bans all in the first wave, right before wallet warrior holiday period?

Edited by woolfie, 30 November 2016 - 03:23 PM.


King_Of_The_T67 #4 Posted 30 November 2016 - 03:27 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 71 battles
  • 43
  • Member since:
    09-24-2015

View Postwoolfie, on 30 November 2016 - 03:23 PM, said:

Did you really expect 50k bans all in the first wave, right before wallet warrior holiday period?

 

No but we kinda expected to ban those that run the most vile and scummiest mods aka ZOOM OUT AND HD GRAPHICS.

Edited by King_Of_The_T67, 30 November 2016 - 03:29 PM.


pallie_the_artillerist #5 Posted 30 November 2016 - 03:55 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17396 battles
  • 1,171
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    01-12-2013
discussing moderating policy is a breach of forum terms of use agreement if I remember correctly

Raffy5 #6 Posted 30 November 2016 - 04:10 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26711 battles
  • 1,977
  • Member since:
    07-09-2012

Don't worry, they will be banned SOON.

But it is WG's SOON™






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users