Jump to content


Update 9.17 General Feedback

9.17

  • Please log in to reply
244 replies to this topic

MrConway #1 Posted 12 December 2016 - 08:06 PM

    Community Coordinator

  • WG Staff
  • 12711 battles
  • 565
  • [CIRC] CIRC
  • Member since:
    10-03-2013

Please leave any general feedback you have about the update here.

 

Should your feedback be in connection with one of the following topics, please leave the feedback in the linked thread instead.

 



robeli #2 Posted 13 December 2016 - 05:46 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 15861 battles
  • 93
  • Member since:
    05-12-2011
Wooooooo!!! Been Waiting for this for 5 years :)

Vossil #3 Posted 13 December 2016 - 05:48 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 14356 battles
  • 62
  • Member since:
    03-21-2013
Finally...next time, please do not tease us so far in advance. :P

Edited by Vossil, 13 December 2016 - 05:48 PM.


airbornefilip #4 Posted 13 December 2016 - 05:48 PM

    Official Kamikaze

  • Beta Tester
  • 24264 battles
  • 239
  • [YATTA] YATTA
  • Member since:
    12-27-2010
Any way I can download patch before 08:00?

bgjudge #5 Posted 13 December 2016 - 05:53 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 25467 battles
  • 121
  • Member since:
    02-11-2012

Dear Wargaming...

You need to add the REAL INFORMATION and FULL INFORMATION for every tank change!

For example- Lowe armor is not 130!!!!! It is 120!!! So please chage the info 9.17 vs 9.16. Lowe armor change is from 120  to 150...

Check all the info before posting! And add some more information- TURRET ARMOR IMPROVED ? ? ?HOW ? ? Cause from 110 to 200 it is NOT improve....It is massive BUFF!

Thanks for bad info anyway.

 


Edited by bgjudge, 13 December 2016 - 05:56 PM.


Dadiles #6 Posted 13 December 2016 - 05:54 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 26855 battles
  • 25
  • Member since:
    10-26-2013

Updates are and should be based on the community's feedback. I saw so many people wanting old maps to come back...What will do you about this, Wargaming?


 

P.S. thank God this swedish tonks aren't OP anymore - more free damage :)

 

 

 

 

 

 



fighting_falcon93 #7 Posted 13 December 2016 - 05:56 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 24309 battles
  • 1,534
  • [STAPA] STAPA
  • Member since:
    02-05-2013
WG can you please give the 103B back its 0.15 accuracy and 6.4 seconds reload? :unsure: :( 

Edited by fighting_falcon93, 13 December 2016 - 06:23 PM.


koditzadispater #8 Posted 13 December 2016 - 05:56 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28758 battles
  • 316
  • [XIIIG] XIIIG
  • Member since:
    06-26-2014

A lot of the changes look good, and this is... the 3rd consecutive good update.

As one that has Lowe, WZ111, T34, SP all this looks very good.

 

Only thing still being unhappy about is that old maps don't come back.

Pretty please?



koditzadispater #9 Posted 13 December 2016 - 06:09 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28758 battles
  • 316
  • [XIIIG] XIIIG
  • Member since:
    06-26-2014

View Postbgjudge, on 13 December 2016 - 06:53 PM, said:

Dear Wargaming...

You need to add the REAL INFORMATION and FULL INFORMATION for every tank change!

For example- Lowe armor is not 130!!!!! It is 120!!! So please chage the info 9.17 vs 9.16. Lowe armor change is from 120  to 150...

Check all the info before posting! And add some more information- TURRET ARMOR IMPROVED ? ? ?HOW ? ? Cause from 110 to 200 it is NOT improve....It is massive BUFF!

Thanks for bad info anyway.

 

it's an announcement that patch will come tomorrow

yes, it might be ambiguous on some points, it might have some errors... but how about "THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO, SO JUST WAIT TILL TOMORROW?"

btw, caps means yelling in Internet language. do you like my reply? no? well, i did not like yours either...



Hentai__Senpai #10 Posted 13 December 2016 - 06:11 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 12922 battles
  • 6
  • [T-V-L] T-V-L
  • Member since:
    11-22-2012

The TDs are utter garbage, and i don't see any reason for playing them.

All the feedback given about the TDs has been washed aside, it seems that WG listens to crying babies that don't want their Grille 15 falling in second place.

 

The Medium-Heavy line was nerfed to oblivion, the Leo  lost its niche and the Emil 1 and 2 are a joke.

 

Nerf those hard and buff the french top tier heavies, because it didn't suffice with nerfing the Swedes.

We got to buff the french auto loaders because balance.

 

It took WG a whole year to release a new tech tree and it's utter garbage, i didn't remember the Skodas being nerfed like this.

 

GG WG! you literally managed to kill the entire tree in less that a month.

 

No that they care, they are milking people with the Black sales and the Advent calendar.

 

/end of rant



grievous12 #11 Posted 13 December 2016 - 06:11 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 48304 battles
  • 39
  • Member since:
    12-30-2011
why you dont remove pilsen? bad map imho.boring for sure.

SlyMeerkat #12 Posted 13 December 2016 - 06:18 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 10905 battles
  • 538
  • [FILO] FILO
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013
Nice stuff, looking forward to it :)

Jolac #13 Posted 13 December 2016 - 06:21 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19517 battles
  • 449
  • [OPAKI] OPAKI
  • Member since:
    07-18-2012

....that SuperPershing PEN BUFF is a nice present....

now it will be the be(a)st premium!



domnulrazvan #14 Posted 13 December 2016 - 06:22 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 16317 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    03-20-2015

View Postgrievous12, on 13 December 2016 - 06:11 PM, said:

why you dont remove pilsen? bad map imho.boring for sure.

Wtf.. it s awesome . Top 3 for sure. 



_HakunaMatata_ #15 Posted 13 December 2016 - 06:31 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 52254 battles
  • 158
  • Member since:
    08-23-2011

WG, why do you remove the chat from enemy team but you allow the XVM to exist? Why should enemy not see my chat but they can see my stats and hit me because of them?

 

 

[Edited] Remove the freaking XVM and let all players be the same. Why should I be targeted because of STATS?

 

In every patch I ask you to remove this XVM and you never do it.


Edited by FireflyDivision, 14 December 2016 - 03:33 PM.
This post has been edited by a member of the moderation team, due to inappropriate content. An official notification has also been sent. -FireflyDivision


Salezinho #16 Posted 13 December 2016 - 06:34 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 18299 battles
  • 84
  • [D_B_C] D_B_C
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View Post_HakunaMatata_, on 13 December 2016 - 06:31 PM, said:

WG, why do you remove the chat from enemy team but you allow the XVM to exist? Why should enemy not see my chat but they can see my stats and hit me because of them?

 

 

[Edited] Remove the freaking XVM and let all players be the same. Why should I be targeted because of STATS?

 

In every patch I ask you to remove this XVM and you never do it.

 

Zero battles. But you didn't forget to cry a river here...

Gremlin182 #17 Posted 13 December 2016 - 06:34 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 36872 battles
  • 5,702
  • Member since:
    04-18-2012

Sounds great to me esp winning some more female crew,

I guess I now need to make a final decision on the Swedish premium tank as it said it was only for sale until 9.17 arrived.

 

 



leggasiini #18 Posted 13 December 2016 - 06:40 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 37176 battles
  • 2,170
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

View Postfighting_falcon93, on 13 December 2016 - 06:56 PM, said:

WG can you please give the 103B back its 0.15 accuracy and 6.4 seconds reload? :unsure: :( 

 

The accuracy is still more than fine imo, so is reload (it can be dropped down to 5,6 seconds as opposed to 5,3 of first iteration; not THAT massive difference). It switches to travel mode much faster and 10 instead of 5 top speed on Siege mode is super useful because you can now stay in siege mode when cresting and peeking hills.

 

The overmatch changes hurts it, however. Though, its not THAT bad, because UFP is still autobounce against most guns in the game. 



_HakunaMatata_ #19 Posted 13 December 2016 - 06:46 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 52254 battles
  • 158
  • Member since:
    08-23-2011

View PostSalezinho, on 13 December 2016 - 05:34 PM, said:

 

Zero battles. But you didn't forget to cry a river here...

 

I have over 50k battles and I have been with WOT since 2011. Use your brain please.

storm4710 #20 Posted 13 December 2016 - 06:48 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 16174 battles
  • 560
  • [SAVVY] SAVVY
  • Member since:
    12-21-2012

View Postsmokerandpoker, on 13 December 2016 - 06:11 PM, said:

The TDs are utter garbage, and i don't see any reason for playing them.

All the feedback given about the TDs has been washed aside, it seems that WG listens to crying babies that don't want their Grille 15 falling in second place.

 

The Medium-Heavy line was nerfed to oblivion, the Leo  lost its niche and the Emil 1 and 2 are a joke.

 

Nerf those hard and buff the french top tier heavies, because it didn't suffice with nerfing the Swedes.

We got to buff the french auto loaders because balance.

 

It took WG a whole year to release a new tech tree and it's utter garbage, i didn't remember the Skodas being nerfed like this.

 

GG WG! you literally managed to kill the entire tree in less that a month.

 

No that they care, they are milking people with the Black sales and the Advent calendar.

 

/end of rant

yeah you are totally right m8

the udes 03 is really hit hard too

View Postleggasiini, on 13 December 2016 - 06:40 PM, said:

 

The accuracy is still more than fine imo, so is reload (it can be dropped down to 5,6 seconds as opposed to 5,3 of first iteration; not THAT massive difference). It switches to travel mode much faster and 10 instead of 5 top speed on Siege mode is super useful because you can now stay in siege mode when cresting and peeking hills.

 

The overmatch changes hurts it, however. Though, its not THAT bad, because UFP is still autobounce against most guns in the game. 

the overmatch changes hurt more than alot think, 
103B it hurts a little
103-0 it hurts a bit more
udes 03 it hurts alot anything bigger than 60mm overmatches it







Also tagged with 9.17

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users