Jump to content


Fifth Clan Wars Campaign – Final Results


  • Please log in to reply
78 replies to this topic

alienslive #61 Posted 16 December 2016 - 11:05 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 107963 battles
  • 1,833
  • [GX] GX
  • Member since:
    09-20-2013

View PostUnfaireSpielweise, on 16 December 2016 - 09:30 AM, said:

I saw a video on youtube where a guy from a top10 clan used destruction mods.

I can not post the video because namecalling is not allowed.

 

But I was wondering if this will be sanctionated?

 

Sure they do. kappa.

Don't live in a dream.


Edited by alienslive, 16 December 2016 - 11:20 AM.


Fat_Ba5tard #62 Posted 16 December 2016 - 11:08 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 29783 battles
  • 189
  • [REBLS] REBLS
  • Member since:
    06-01-2013

View PostM4dc4tpt, on 16 December 2016 - 10:39 AM, said:

Is there any problem with the medals from this campaign??

 

Some players haven´t received it yet

 

I got my medals. It was the happiest moment of my life. 

tdradrian #63 Posted 16 December 2016 - 11:31 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 67267 battles
  • 37
  • Member since:
    12-09-2012

View PostFjeIIreven, on 15 December 2016 - 06:51 PM, said:

 

No, you had to be in top 6000 to get a tank from personal fame points. Tanks not claimed by the top 50 clans will be distributed to players below the 6000th position, but the last position to get a tank this way should be around the 8400th position.

 

wrong,you supposed,to be in the first 11k because players in first 50 clans they are top 11k ,the problem are those players that sold their place in the clan and then took the tank becouse of the FP rankings.this is why you have 2676 players that took 2 tanks each 1 by selling their place and second by fame points,and this is the big problem of this rules ,50 clans(5k players) took 7676 tanks and the rest of 80k fools fought for 3 k tanks this is WG ideea of Fair play

Edited by tdradrian, 16 December 2016 - 11:31 AM.


Raffy5 #64 Posted 16 December 2016 - 11:35 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26711 battles
  • 1,977
  • Member since:
    07-09-2012

View Posttdradrian, on 16 December 2016 - 12:31 PM, said:

 

wrong,you supposed,to be in the first 11k because players in first 50 clans they are top 11k ,the problem are those players that sold their place in the clan and then took the tank becouse of the FP rankings.this is why you have 2676 players that took 2 tanks each 1 by selling their place and second by fame points,and this is the big problem of this rules ,50 clans(5k players) took 7676 tanks and the rest of 80k fools fought for 3 k tanks this is WG ideea of Fair play

 

So you found out what WG has been smoking and tried it as well?

Tell us what is it????



Trevez_TTV #65 Posted 16 December 2016 - 12:02 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 4290 battles
  • 17
  • [WHO] WHO
  • Member since:
    05-11-2016

Do you ever notice no matter how much truth there is in a comment , there are always people who will attack it. What went on in this campaign is a disgrace and I for one will never partake again. 

My alt finished in the top 11k, we merged 3 clans together so 6 and 8 were a struggle but we had a 58% win rate at tier 10. But for 3 players to finish in the top 11k  and find out that someone as low as 80,000 position got a tank leaves a very very bitter taste with over 95 players.

 

Congrats to everyone that got the tank by actually partaking in the campaign and congrats to fame.

 

Personally I have spent over 3k on wargaming products over 5 years but from now I'll be reconsidering my future spending habits.



3W1_ #66 Posted 16 December 2016 - 12:07 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32711 battles
  • 1,373
  • [72861] 72861
  • Member since:
    09-23-2012

View PostPlatinum_Tanker, on 16 December 2016 - 11:02 AM, said:

Do you ever notice no matter how much truth there is in a comment , there are always people who will attack it. What went on in this campaign is a disgrace and I for one will never partake again. 

My alt finished in the top 11k, we merged 3 clans together so 6 and 8 were a struggle but we had a 58% win rate at tier 10. But for 3 players to finish in the top 11k  and find out that someone as low as 80,000 position got a tank leaves a very very bitter taste with over 95 players.

 

Congrats to everyone that got the tank by actually partaking in the campaign and congrats to fame.

 

Personally I have spent over 3k on wargaming products over 5 years but from now I'll be reconsidering my future spending habits.

 

u want to tell me only cause u spent 3k whatever, i guess u mean euro and a lot of time u should be rewarded

Alexlockerr #67 Posted 16 December 2016 - 12:22 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16907 battles
  • 178
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    09-30-2014

View PostCranky100, on 15 December 2016 - 06:41 PM, said:

Just WOOOOOOOOW WG, well done u are a f..... heroes...  You give a tank to player who played around 15 battles he could played it in 2 days, but players who played 200+ battles and played every day u give almost nothing. Well played WG. this is last time we played your stupid and unfair campaign.
THX FOR NOTHING

   

 

it's about winning ,not participating . you should have bern focusing in winning more than participating (and losing) in all the battles possible 

God0fwar300 #68 Posted 16 December 2016 - 01:13 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23208 battles
  • 908
  • [-TEK-] -TEK-
  • Member since:
    12-27-2012

I am so angry!

OMG I AM SO ENGRRY !!!!!

 

I opened an orange with my fingers and the juice sprinkled all over my shirt.



Trevez_TTV #69 Posted 16 December 2016 - 01:18 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 4290 battles
  • 17
  • [WHO] WHO
  • Member since:
    05-11-2016

View Post3W1T4NK_PL, on 16 December 2016 - 12:07 PM, said:

 

u want to tell me only cause u spent 3k whatever, i guess u mean euro and a lot of time u should be rewarded

 

No I don't expect to be rewarded for spending money but I also don't expect to be shafted. Can you please tell me what is wrong with rewarding that top 11k players with tanks, are the so called high stat players that afraid they will be found wanting?

juippi71 #70 Posted 16 December 2016 - 01:40 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 43383 battles
  • 1
  • [LENO] LENO
  • Member since:
    04-29-2013
Did banned players get tanks?

tdradrian #71 Posted 16 December 2016 - 02:25 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 67267 battles
  • 37
  • Member since:
    12-09-2012

First I want to apologize to players from photos have nothing with them and like them there are 2767 player so .. lets explain :

To have minimum requirements for a clan licences you need minimum 15 battles ,this mean 2 days 8 battles per day(8 , 8:15 ,9, 9:15 10, 10:15 11,11:15 all PM) even less if we consider that between them you have time for second tour on a landing.

So a player from big clan after he made sure he is going to qualify for the tank by Fame points sell his place in the clan and then rejoin after campaign simple as that.

in the picture there are 3 example of that. Once again is not their fault, like them there are 2676 players ,dear WG if you speak about fair play lets make it fair,because if you don t change your rules we let them 50 clan play your campaign ,why loose credits,time,nerves,when  you don t care about this practices under your nose

tdradrianPIC1.pngPIC2.jpgPIC3.jpg

 



3W1_ #72 Posted 16 December 2016 - 02:48 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32711 battles
  • 1,373
  • [72861] 72861
  • Member since:
    09-23-2012
and how can u proof that someone sells his place? i mean are u paranoid or what

UnfaireSpielweise #73 Posted 16 December 2016 - 04:11 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 335 battles
  • 3,332
  • Member since:
    12-07-2016

View PostUnfaireSpielweise, on 16 December 2016 - 10:30 AM, said:

I saw a video on youtube where a guy from a top10 clan used destruction mods.

I can not post the video because namecalling is not allowed.

 

But I was wondering if this will be sanctionated?

 

Hello Wargaming Team, please respond to my question.

tdradrian #74 Posted 16 December 2016 - 05:16 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 67267 battles
  • 37
  • Member since:
    12-09-2012

View Postjuippi71, on 16 December 2016 - 01:40 PM, said:

Did banned players get tanks?

 

off course they did

pmakins #75 Posted 16 December 2016 - 07:38 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 51291 battles
  • 503
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    10-17-2010

View PostUnfaireSpielweise, on 16 December 2016 - 04:11 PM, said:

 

Hello Wargaming Team, please respond to my question.

 

WG hasnt answered any question on the forums regarding CW matter in some time now, dont even try :)
But we deserve it, people here are just plain lazy and WG is using it against us :)


Remember IS5 campaign? When 320 players got screwed up because WG had bad translators? Well everyone cried and whined for 3 weeks and after the dust has settled, everyone just continued playing :)
There will never be any changes on the EU server as long as we do something serious that will actually hurt WG in general ;)

 



HundeWurst #76 Posted 16 December 2016 - 08:34 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 76008 battles
  • 4,633
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

Well that was a bit stupid rage. Whatever. As per usual Wargaming delivers some cooked up leaderboards which have nothing to do with reality.

But by now we should all be used to that. RASHA RASHA ways are also strong here in the EU when we are talking about Wargaming :P .

 

 

E1: I can understand the frustration about the ticket system and the personal famepoint system. I completly agree that this system can be easily abused by anyone. Might that be for money or for favors of any other kind. Wargaming needs to adress that. In reality there are no 6000 tanks for personal fampoint players.

Now I dont know how you came up with the 8000 and 3000 numbers and I dont quit think that this problems is so severe but it is a problem non the less. Still it is once more up to Wargaming to adress that.

 

 


Edited by WundeWurst, 16 December 2016 - 08:55 PM.


UnfaireSpielweise #77 Posted 16 December 2016 - 11:12 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 335 battles
  • 3,332
  • Member since:
    12-07-2016

View Postpmakins, on 16 December 2016 - 07:38 PM, said:

 

WG hasnt answered any question on the forums regarding CW matter in some time now, dont even try :)
But we deserve it, people here are just plain lazy and WG is using it against us :)


Remember IS5 campaign? When 320 players got screwed up because WG had bad translators? Well everyone cried and whined for 3 weeks and after the dust has settled, everyone just continued playing :)
There will never be any changes on the EU server as long as we do something serious that will actually hurt WG in general ;)

 

 

I will keep this topic up untill there will be a response or this topic will be up until 2023 i dont care ;-)

FreemanNSM #78 Posted 16 December 2016 - 11:47 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 58292 battles
  • 286
  • Member since:
    12-15-2012

View PostPlatinum_Tanker, on 16 December 2016 - 12:18 PM, said:

 

No I don't expect to be rewarded for spending money but I also don't expect to be shafted. Can you please tell me what is wrong with rewarding that top 11k players with tanks, are the so called high stat players that afraid they will be found wanting?

 

Okay,so what is your suggestion? Everyone get the tank? :D Wtf is wrong with you guys? But seriously ,do you have any brain cells? So what you are suggesting is WG should do is put campaign like this,dont win ,dont finish tasks,just keep playing and get the tank ? :facepalm:

tdradrian #79 Posted 17 December 2016 - 03:13 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 67267 battles
  • 37
  • Member since:
    12-09-2012

View PostRaffy5, on 16 December 2016 - 11:35 AM, said:

 

So you found out what WG has been smoking and tried it as well?

Tell us what is it????

 

Honestly I see no suspicious movements in your clan Raffy, but this doesn't mean it doesn t exist,you can check or see a post down further how players left the clan up to 5 days before the and of campaign ,only to comeback after. so trust me i didn t smoke I am just stating the facts .

Edited by tdradrian, 17 December 2016 - 03:14 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users