Jump to content


Fair Play Policy: The Battle Continues


  • Please log in to reply
572 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:08 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 21,912
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011

*
POPULAR

We continue to clamp down on cheaters with further action for players using prohibited mods.

Full news text

repineheart #2 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:15 PM

    Private

  • Beta Tester
  • 23902 battles
  • 31
  • [H0PE] H0PE
  • Member since:
    01-16-2011
What about the battle statistics improvements gained from use of unfair mods and tools? Can they retain the same?

R3dBaron #3 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:15 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8899 battles
  • 288
  • [ENEMY] ENEMY
  • Member since:
    04-22-2011

Thank you for the update.

 

But from my observation, there are still a lot of people using the autoaim hack and snap-shooting every available module/crew member in my tanks from 300+ metres.

 

Please keep your good work and, if possible, increase your efforts.

 

Best regards.


Edited by R3dBaron, 05 January 2017 - 03:15 PM.


Spek_en_Bonen #4 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:17 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 29353 battles
  • 6,431
  • Member since:
    07-27-2010

Gud.

181 permbans. I like it.



R3dBaron #5 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:19 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8899 battles
  • 288
  • [ENEMY] ENEMY
  • Member since:
    04-22-2011

View Postrepineheart, on 05 January 2017 - 02:15 PM, said:

What about the battle statistics improvements gained from use of unfair mods and tools? Can they retain the same?

 

Actually, you are right.

 

An offender, even if not permanently banned, should have his personal rating reduced to zero at the date of the temporary ban and work from there after being unbanned (all the other stats are important to assess if he is a bot or if he is using hacks).



nightmare_sd #6 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:21 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 33996 battles
  • 4
  • [_VUK_] _VUK_
  • Member since:
    02-01-2012

Good job guys! :)

Some good news in this year :)

 

Regards



fighting_falcon93 #7 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:26 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 25892 battles
  • 2,589
  • Member since:
    02-05-2013

Good job WG, +1 :great:

 

And LOL to the 181 idiots that was too retarded to take the hint the first time :D 



_Crusad3r_ #8 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:31 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 24978 battles
  • 1,260
  • [CRY-X] CRY-X
  • Member since:
    11-22-2012
I would probably speak for quite a large number of us in showing us names - for all we know these accounts are inactive and have been for some time or are bot accounts. I can understand why not but you would probably earn alot more trust from the community if you showed us names :)

_flyingdutchmen #9 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:33 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 25244 battles
  • 420
  • [CRY2] CRY2
  • Member since:
    04-05-2013

View PostR3dBaron, on 05 January 2017 - 04:19 PM, said:

 

Actually, you are right.

 

An offender, even if not permanently banned, should have his personal rating reduced to zero at the date of the temporary ban and work from there after being unbanned (all the other stats are important to assess if he is a bot or if he is using hacks).

 

Thats like a free reroll?! Not really a punichment is it? 

RonUOver #10 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:33 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 34532 battles
  • 1
  • [MUTED] MUTED
  • Member since:
    02-22-2013
Good job guys! I suppose it also has a great preventive effect when a player from your clan is banned. How about a counter on the login screen telling how many banned so far/this week...?

lceangel #11 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:36 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 24290 battles
  • 41
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostCommunity, on 05 January 2017 - 02:08 PM, said:

We continue to clamp down on cheaters with further action for players using prohibited mods.
<a href="http://worldoftanks.eu/en/news/pc-browser/46/fairplay_continue/">Full news text</a>

 

only 181 pe

rm bann ? ill be happy when you`ll announce 1181. that will be  1 % from  the total players using cheats .do the math to see  how many proc means 181?    



hedi2222 #12 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:37 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 23019 battles
  • 7,247
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    08-12-2013
you sure you didn't fck it up like you did with the TT event ?

2Spooky #13 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:38 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 22797 battles
  • 47
  • Member since:
    06-07-2013
why is there still not a list of those who got banned for cheating?

Eaglax #14 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:41 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 17439 battles
  • 2,813
  • Member since:
    01-12-2012

would be interesting which mods where used most often.

destruction mod? aimbots? tundra? or just afk-bots?


Edited by Eaglax, 05 January 2017 - 03:43 PM.


touch_of_death #15 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:44 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Commander
  • 56065 battles
  • 814
  • [-B1C-] -B1C-
  • Member since:
    06-18-2012

I don't know why you don't just make your servers have the ability to not allow players using mods to join, say like this, eu1 has mods usage and eu2 no mods can log on simple to me?

 

speaking for myself I would live on eu2


 


Edited by touch_of_death, 05 January 2017 - 03:46 PM.


_flyingdutchmen #16 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:45 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 25244 battles
  • 420
  • [CRY2] CRY2
  • Member since:
    04-05-2013

I like what you’re Doing WG. So Big :great: up for you. But just to play The Devil's Advocate. In the EU it’s not allowed to monitor a computer from a costumer. Something with Privacy and stuff like that. If WG is doing that. Like look in your resmod folder to see what mods you are using, there pretty much breaking every privacy law in the EU.

 

In Russia it is allowed, But not in the EU. So how does WG do it? 



2Spooky #17 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:46 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 22797 battles
  • 47
  • Member since:
    06-07-2013

View PostEaglax, on 05 January 2017 - 11:41 PM, said:

would be interesting which mods where used most often.

destruction mod? aimbots? tundra? or just afk-bots?

 

my guess would be aimbot since its the mod thats mostly complained about in randoms.

_flyingdutchmen #18 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:46 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 25244 battles
  • 420
  • [CRY2] CRY2
  • Member since:
    04-05-2013

View Post2Spooky, on 05 January 2017 - 04:38 PM, said:

why is there still not a list of those who got banned for cheating?

 

Naming and Shaming is forbidden in the EU. A criminal has privasy to. 

Steeltank141 #19 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:49 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 15630 battles
  • 244
  • [4STAR] 4STAR
  • Member since:
    01-26-2015
A penalty for 5300 accounts and some permabans. Great stuff! +1 

Algonquin_Dave #20 Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:51 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 24376 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    11-10-2014

View PostCommunity, on 05 January 2017 - 03:08 PM, said:

We continue to clamp down on cheaters with further action for players using prohibited mods.
<a href="http://worldoftanks.eu/en/news/pc-browser/46/fairplay_continue/">Full news text</a>

 

WoT

You probably are facing an endless task, but those of us who 'play fair' very much appreciate your efforts. Please continue to ban those offenders. And thanks for trying to keep this on-line experience an 'even playing field'.

Happy New Year.

Algonquin_Dave






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users