Jump to content


Bring the old maps back petition

Old maps Province Port Hidden Village Make WoT great Again Komarin Pearl River Dragon Ridge South Coast Severogorsk

  • Please log in to reply
35 replies to this topic

Poll: Bring back old maps! (156 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

I want old maps back.

  1. I agree. (147 votes [93.63%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 93.63%

  2. I disagree (10 votes [6.37%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 6.37%

WG should rework existing maps

  1. I agree. (116 votes [74.36%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 74.36%

  2. I disagree. (40 votes [25.64%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 25.64%

I want more city maps.

  1. I agree. (33 votes [21.15%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 21.15%

  2. I disagree (123 votes [78.85%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 78.85%

I want more open maps.

  1. I agree. (134 votes [85.90%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 85.90%

  2. I disagree (22 votes [14.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 14.10%

Vote Hide poll

_EKS_FlArE_ #21 Posted 03 June 2017 - 04:39 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 19979 battles
  • 1
  • [PS-AG] PS-AG
  • Member since:
    06-24-2012

I don't quite like the current maps because it's always the same crap( 3 [edited]corridors on city maps or campinowka ).

 

I have played WoT since 2012 and those maps where I had so many different outcomes were removed.

 

Yeah they weren't mirrored or how WG calls it "balanced" and had a lot of areas where crap's on fire but there were also alot more opportunities and tactics to win this. It was way more fun in my opinion.

 

B r i n g  t h e  o l d  m a p s  b a c k  W G  PLEASE



Lerxst2012 #22 Posted 03 July 2017 - 08:59 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 57396 battles
  • 131
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

after 5 years WOT has become a little tedious.  Nothing to do with all of the exciting tanks we have to choose from (ok a bit of sarcasm in there) as there is plenty of variety.

 

However what we don't have is a wide selection of maps.  How many of you play say 20 battles and you see 6 maps within that selection.

 

Wouldn't it actually be fun if you never saw the same map twice in those 20 battles.  Might have to think it bit hey?  Might even think blimey where do I go on this map again?

 

That would certainly make it interesting rather than seeing MINES or HIMMELSDORF multiple times.  Oh let me think HILL anybody?

 

If WG resurrected some old maps it would make it more interesting and keep some of us loyal players/customers happy.

 

Bet you though we get another five premium tier 8 tanks before we see another map introduced?  Cant think why they would do that can you :):)


Edited by Lerxst2012, 03 July 2017 - 09:05 PM.


Dr_Blade #23 Posted 02 September 2017 - 09:52 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 25835 battles
  • 104
  • [-AWF-] -AWF-
  • Member since:
    11-21-2014

Can't see why the old "unbalanced" maps couldn't be brought back to low tiers.

 

It's now mines, mines, mines, mines, mines, mines.

And are the games balanced? Not at all, match is decided by which side gets more veteran sealclubbers in their M2 lights.

 

Put the horribly unbalanced maps on Tier 1-3 games and the somewhat unbalanced ones to 4-6. 

The remaining "perfectly balanced" maps should go to tier 8 and above for the purest competitive multiplayer experience,

and by all means tweak them on every patch to reach even further levels of stunning brilliance.



Version43 #24 Posted 02 September 2017 - 10:05 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 6123 battles
  • 147
  • [SOS_] SOS_
  • Member since:
    12-07-2013
Dear WG you can remove Paris because i already learned to love Pilsen. TIA. :sceptic:

j3fr0 #25 Posted 08 September 2017 - 10:34 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16285 battles
  • 125
  • [WAAT] WAAT
  • Member since:
    05-31-2015
Do any WG staff pay attention to the forums? I get the feelin they don't care about us lol...

HrX89 #26 Posted 15 September 2017 - 01:25 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 30202 battles
  • 64
  • [VFORV] VFORV
  • Member since:
    09-29-2012

View Postj3fr0, on 08 September 2017 - 10:34 AM, said:

Do any WG staff pay attention to the forums? I get the feelin they don't care about us lol...

 

They do, thats's why we got new maps that are not urban! All hail Paris/Pilsen/Ruinberg in fire/winter Himmelsdorf.  :sceptic:

larsi64 #27 Posted 29 September 2017 - 09:30 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 27713 battles
  • 20
  • [RASC] RASC
  • Member since:
    12-24-2013

View Postkaspervdh, on 03 March 2017 - 08:55 PM, said:

Why don't they just include an option that allows you to disable specific maps? Just like you can do with battle types.

 

Just my idea..... why not make it up to the user which maps they want to play, and sure WG could  get stats out of that and then maybe have a clue what maps people really like to play.....

Brodie_ #28 Posted 30 September 2017 - 12:31 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 71267 battles
  • 239
  • Member since:
    10-21-2013

I do not really care that much that these old maps were unbalanced.

 

If that is a problem for competetive team play, then do not allow them on Skirmish, Campaign & the Global map!

 

But please let us have them all back for Random battles!

 

It add's so much more variety to the game!

 

I do not care if I spawn upon the uncompetetive side of these maps.

 

It just makes it more of a challenge!

 

Cheers


Edited by Brodie_, 30 September 2017 - 12:32 PM.


BillCarson1997 #29 Posted 30 September 2017 - 01:31 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5269 battles
  • 41
  • Member since:
    11-26-2015
Just add some artillery-safe zones for open maps. 

FireflyDivision #30 Posted 30 September 2017 - 01:48 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 23237 battles
  • 3,540
  • [REKRZ] REKRZ
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011
I would love to see South Coast, Perl River and Hidden Village back. 

Capt_B_Willard #31 Posted 16 October 2017 - 10:35 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 52177 battles
  • 141
  • Member since:
    09-13-2011
Does WG even care about what we, players, think ?

HrX89 #32 Posted 17 October 2017 - 06:15 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 30202 battles
  • 64
  • [VFORV] VFORV
  • Member since:
    09-29-2012

View PostCapt_B_Willard, on 16 October 2017 - 10:35 AM, said:

Does WG even care about what we, players, think ?

 

They do. As long as they can get money outta you :)

Capt_B_Willard #33 Posted 18 October 2017 - 10:50 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 52177 battles
  • 141
  • Member since:
    09-13-2011
OK here is the deal......why don't they sell a DLC with optional maps !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HrX89 #34 Posted 19 October 2017 - 09:41 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 30202 battles
  • 64
  • [VFORV] VFORV
  • Member since:
    09-29-2012

View PostCapt_B_Willard, on 18 October 2017 - 10:50 AM, said:

OK here is the deal......why don't they sell a DLC with optional maps !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Not everyone would buy it, and there would be no enough players for that.

Anyways, WG is trying hard to scare the people off. So far, doing good.
I hope Minecraft gets Golden Joystick. :)

XikoFtW #35 Posted 23 October 2017 - 10:16 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 24103 battles
  • 16
  • [ESPOR] ESPOR
  • Member since:
    04-29-2012

Wow, I had been wondering what happened to a few of my favorites that I hadn't seen in a while.... they've been removed?!?!?!  That seems completely illogical.  Variety is the spice of life!  It even seems weird that the developers would put so much time into creating these, and then their work was ultimately been for nothing.

 

If this all stemmed from a few disgruntled players voting away some maps they didn't like, how about an alternative is there be an option in settings to not play on x maps.... where x is a number small enough to block some they really don't want to play on, but not something too high that it massively affects win rates because a player sucks at the maps they are trying to block out.  Maybe 3?  List all maps, and include a checkbox next to them.  Check up to 3, hit ok, never get it in a random battle etc again.  I think something to keep in mind is when someone dislikes something, they like to complain about it, whereas when someone likes something, they don't feel the same need to make their voice heard.  I'm sure there are more players who like all maps than who dislike them.

 

Oh man, I just researched this, and it seems 9 maps have been removed!  This just seems crazy to me.  Some seem to have been removed because one team had an advantage.  That's probably true for every single map to some degree, but what side you're on is random.  Most battles involved overcoming some disadvantage!

 

These have all been removed:

  • Pearl River
  • Komarin
  • Port
  • Province
  • Northwest
  • Hidden Village
  • Dragon Ridge
  • South Coast
  • Severogorsk

 

PLEASE WG,LISTEN TO YOUR PLAYERS AND BRING OLD MAPS BACK. CANT BE THAT HARD !!!! (can it?)


Edited by XikoFtW, 23 October 2017 - 10:20 AM.


XikoFtW #36 Posted 29 October 2017 - 10:18 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 24103 battles
  • 16
  • [ESPOR] ESPOR
  • Member since:
    04-29-2012
Well, it seems that at last WG is looking into this. Not the map I would like to see first brought back (basically its a low tier map), but this is by no means I positive sign from WG. Hope Province will be the first of of those 9 listed above. Fingers crossed. 
 

"" Players have been asking Wargaming to return some removed maps. Currently Wargaming is focusing on HD maps, but that doesn’t mean some time to start working on older maps. Province seems to be the first map Wargaming has decided to start reworking, and possibly, return it to the game. There are currently two versions in Supertest, while they are similar in the central area, there are several differences that map each map an unique experience.""


Edited by XikoFtW, 30 October 2017 - 12:35 PM.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users