Jump to content


t1105


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

domins80 #1 Posted 24 February 2017 - 05:47 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 47615 battles
  • 8
  • [SCAPE] SCAPE
  • Member since:
    05-05-2013

WG should be proud of their fresh released update for e5 - after several games, they totally ****** another tank. Ammo rack can be damaged from left or right side, even from rear through the engine as it happend in last game. Commanders cupola can be penetrated extremly easy, even by t8 meds and even e25 TD :D:D from 300m. In last several games, all meds penetrated cupola and kill commander several times from more than 300m. 

So another not tested update at all. Noobs complained, that they can't hit e5 to weak spots, instead of learn where those weak spots are. So WG made weak spots even more weak. Congrats. 

The same as they made Grille as med tank and after 2 updates later, they "corrected" it, beacuse players use it as med tank :D:D. OFC, when Grille was faster then tX meds. What they expected? So now, they made it slower, bad gun handling etc. Another not tested and no brain update tank.

keep going on WG :)



Hyina #2 Posted 24 February 2017 - 08:20 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 54099 battles
  • 190
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013
You must be high.

markthekiller #3 Posted 25 February 2017 - 04:17 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 17331 battles
  • 124
  • [EMOJI] EMOJI
  • Member since:
    07-12-2011
E5 needed a nerf indeed, but not the cupola which had a (small) 220mm area (easy to hit in close combat). The LFP should be nerfed to something like 200mm effective everywhere. 

Eokokok #4 Posted 26 February 2017 - 12:56 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 18697 battles
  • 6,162
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012
Cupola can be penned with tanks using 200 pen APCR, while it has 240 effective armour, yeah... Cry more, a new river is needed.

Razzupaltuff #5 Posted 07 March 2017 - 03:01 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 43306 battles
  • 463
  • [-IFZ-] -IFZ-
  • Member since:
    08-22-2010
The E5 was balanced before. Its great frontal armor was offset by very poor side armor. The cupola nerf was uncalled for. Every tier 8 can easily pen it now. Its greatest strength has been taken from it, with nothing to compensate. It already has very bad alpha for a tier X heavy. Sheesh. Sometimes WG makes me feel like they have nothing left to do, so they start to tinker with things that are working perfectly well just to do something.

Edited by VanHunten, 07 March 2017 - 03:01 PM.


Eokokok #6 Posted 13 March 2017 - 10:12 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 18697 battles
  • 6,162
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012

Again, how can tier 8 with 210-225 pen easily pen 240 turret? How are you playing this tank if you fail against tier 8 enemies? The lowest turret gets is 235-ish, which is roughly 35% pen rate for tier 8 tanks, if they hit, since the are 245 and 330 strips right on both sides...

 

Armour is not this tank biggest strenght, the gun is, aiming fast, great soft stats, DPM, accuracy, everything. With decent mobilty. Please, stop whinning about cupola already. The hull nerf is more noticable and noone cries about it, seriously, what is wrong with people playing E5.



Asghaad #7 Posted 13 March 2017 - 10:31 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 14109 battles
  • 3,103
  • [PPDCZ] PPDCZ
  • Member since:
    01-23-2013

View PostEokokok, on 13 March 2017 - 10:12 AM, said:

Again, how can tier 8 with 210-225 pen easily pen 240 turret? How are you playing this tank if you fail against tier 8 enemies? The lowest turret gets is 235-ish, which is roughly 35% pen rate for tier 8 tanks, if they hit, since the are 245 and 330 strips right on both sides...

 

Armour is not this tank biggest strenght, the gun is, aiming fast, great soft stats, DPM, accuracy, everything. With decent mobilty. Please, stop whinning about cupola already. The hull nerf is more noticable and noone cries about it, seriously, what is wrong with people playing E5.

 

that cupola is 220-230mm effective from the front (right side from the point of view of the shooter)

turn it only few degrees and that armor panel drops below 200

 

and T8 with pen of 225 can roll up to 281.25 but you know that ...

 

needles to say i sold E5 after being snapshotted to the cupola by the patriot 5 times in a row  - the T10 heavy that has armor comparable to medium but has nowhere near the medium gun (yes its great for Heavy but mediocre to bad for a T10 medium) and sub par mobility (again good for a heavy, crap for medium.

 

just see for yourself : http://tanks.gg/comp...21~centurion-ax



Eokokok #8 Posted 13 March 2017 - 11:02 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 18697 battles
  • 6,162
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012

It is not 220 unless enemy is way above you, lowest it gets is think stripe of 235, with 245-330 on both sides. You getting penned is either possitioning error, gold spam or probably both.

 



Asghaad #9 Posted 13 March 2017 - 01:14 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 14109 battles
  • 3,103
  • [PPDCZ] PPDCZ
  • Member since:
    01-23-2013

View PostEokokok, on 13 March 2017 - 11:02 AM, said:

It is not 220 unless enemy is way above you, lowest it gets is think stripe of 235, with 245-330 on both sides. You getting penned is either possitioning error, gold spam or probably both.

 

 

or engaging more than one target which you do most of the time ...

 

the point is T8s can go through that cupola easily, for T9 and T10s its auto pen zone ... making any armor on 110E5 meaningless when weakspot you cant hide is triple the size of normal cupola... and of course the lower glacis nerf means that anyone with RoF for permatrack can take E5 out while simultaneously wrecking its ammorack ...

 

it was butchered to the point where its pointless to take it into battle again - it cant tank anything anymore so its pointless to take it as heavy, its gun isnt good enough to replace medium either and 113 is MUCH better heavium than E5 ...

 

so it goes the way of Fochs - from SLIGHTLY overpowered to absolutely useless ...



Eokokok #10 Posted 13 March 2017 - 01:20 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 18697 battles
  • 6,162
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012
It is still better armour on the turret then it was pre HD buff, when it still was one of better tier X tanks. It want from tank for every moron to use to what it was before - high skill cap great HT for people using brain. And its gun is good enough. The fact that 113 is still overbuffed is no excuse to leave other OP tanks as they were.

Asghaad #11 Posted 13 March 2017 - 02:39 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 14109 battles
  • 3,103
  • [PPDCZ] PPDCZ
  • Member since:
    01-23-2013

View PostEokokok, on 13 March 2017 - 01:20 PM, said:

It is still better armour on the turret then it was pre HD buff, when it still was one of better tier X tanks. It want from tank for every moron to use to what it was before - high skill cap great HT for people using brain. And its gun is good enough. The fact that 113 is still overbuffed is no excuse to leave other OP tanks as they were.

 

then it should have received the gun nerf and/or lower glacis nerf, not make its sprocket an auto win for the enemy and its cupola the humongous weakspot it is

 

as i sayd if you want to play tank with good gun, mobility and passable armor, you play mediums, not heavy.

 

ill rather play the IS-4 that can at least angle its armor and protect its turret weakspot  (and considering the rumors that the ST-I turret swap is in the works ... )

 

 

and 113 overbuffed ? what are you smoking here ... it seems in your opinion the only acceptable heavy is when its as slow as E-100 it would seem ...



Eokokok #12 Posted 13 March 2017 - 02:55 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 18697 battles
  • 6,162
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012

113 is currently the most OP, hardest carry vehicle at tier X, whether you accept facts is not really my concern.

 

E5 should not engage many enemies, it was overbuffed to a point where it could, but that is just promoting terrible plays and making tank perform more tasks that it should - it is not a breakthrough vehicle. You don't have to play yours, seems like you are a flavor-of-the-month kind of player. I suggest you buy yourself 113, Maus or Kravgngngnnwngn, they are more up you alley of playing only overbuffed OP vehicles.

 

And the part about IS-4, one of the if not the single worst tier X HTs made me chuckle... Makes the whole comment really relevant.



Asghaad #13 Posted 14 March 2017 - 05:12 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 14109 battles
  • 3,103
  • [PPDCZ] PPDCZ
  • Member since:
    01-23-2013

View PostEokokok, on 13 March 2017 - 02:55 PM, said:

113 is currently the most OP, hardest carry vehicle at tier X, whether you accept facts is not really my concern.

 

E5 should not engage many enemies, it was overbuffed to a point where it could, but that is just promoting terrible plays and making tank perform more tasks that it should - it is not a breakthrough vehicle. You don't have to play yours, seems like you are a flavor-of-the-month kind of player. I suggest you buy yourself 113, Maus or Kravgngngnnwngn, they are more up you alley of playing only overbuffed OP vehicles.

 

And the part about IS-4, one of the if not the single worst tier X HTs made me chuckle... Makes the whole comment really relevant.

 

1. since when are tanks with lower glacis made of wet rice paper and two nice turret cupola weakspots overpowered ... the only advantage 113 has over T10 medium is the upper glacis armor in everything else its inferior ...

 

2. yeah im so flavour of the month that i bought one of the oldest T10 heavies in the game to replace now useless T110E5 ...

 

3. not in my hands it isnt xD IS-4 requires a heavy tank driver which clearly you are not. nothing wrong with that except the fact you crap all over heavy tanks when you dont drive them much and obviously expect them to be just XP piniatas for your TDs and mediums ...



tumppi776 #14 Posted 14 March 2017 - 06:01 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 46570 battles
  • 2,444
  • [T-BAD] T-BAD
  • Member since:
    01-27-2014

Weak tank confirmed:

 

http://wotreplays.co...umppi776-t110e5



Horatio__Caine #15 Posted 24 April 2017 - 03:26 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 27399 battles
  • 4,505
  • [SA-AS] SA-AS
  • Member since:
    05-11-2012

View Posttumppi776, on 14 March 2017 - 07:01 PM, said:

Weak tank confirmed:

 

http://wotreplays.co...umppi776-t110e5

 

everyday some people manage to make such results with weak tanks. 

 

T110E5 is completely garabage. No reason to play with it instead of op maus and type5



Eokokok #16 Posted 25 April 2017 - 02:07 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 18697 battles
  • 6,162
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012
Maus is better, but Type? Seriously, there is little good about it.

dacoshild #17 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:17 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10503 battles
  • 26
  • Member since:
    12-26-2013
Just play Super Conqueror instead.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users