Hello , Firstly I am not saying it dose not take a certain skill set to play the game or that there are not better players .

Ok Win Rate Statistics ,

If any player is getting 54% upwards and we know they are , that there is something going on at wargaming.net

Because the probability of randomness will always bring the win rate down to the area of 50% no mater how skilful the player is or if they platoon all the time . You cant have randomness and consistently its Impossible , what you can have is consistently random .You get the idea .

Example

58% win rate after say 10000 battles . No way , because of randomness will always bring the win rate down to the area of 50% every other 100 battles no mater how skilful the player is even if they are platoon all the time .You get the idea .

So lets look at clan Recruitment for a Top clan .

60+% average Win Ratio

Wait for it, No Way , its Impossible .

So this would put forward the consideration that Top clans have no idea of basic mathematics .

The Way It Is

So what happening , well it would suggest using the above example 10000 battles some players are getting harder battles or softer battles than others .

So now throw in other player performance statistics WN8 ect ,

No way .

Because their numbers are derived from the same 10000 battles . Harder battles , lower dmg and lower player performance , softer battles higher dmg and higher player performance. You get the idea .

The proof I hear you say well the proof is the numbers ,You cant have randomness and consistently its Impossible , what you can have is consistently random . You get the idea .

To Put It Another Way

Its like Wargaming.net pissing in my pocket then telling me its raining and shooting themselves in the foot simultaneously .

In my opinion , it is that win rate statistics are a software difficulty setting at wargaming.net and no amount of skill or platoon will change your winrate statistics .